Generate storage admin spec for 2019-08-08

[wenjlu-lgy]

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

• I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
• Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
• The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

• Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
• adding/removing APIs.
• adding/removing properties.
• adding/removing API-version.
• adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

• If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
  Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

[openapi-sdkautomation]

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from be27ac2, Iteration 12)

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request.

[AutorestCI]

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-python

[azuresdkci]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[AutorestCI]

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

[wenjlu-lgy]

@bganapa @deathly809 @martabarillas Could you help to review the spec for new azure stack srp?

[Juliehzl]

@wenjlu-lgy When you resolve all the change request, you can request @ryansbenson review again. When ARM sign off, I will review swagger spec for you. Another thing to note is you need to resolve conflicts and make CI check passed.

[wenjlu-lgy]

@ryansbenson I've resolved all the comments, could you help to review it again?

[deathly809]

Looks good to me.

[Juliehzl]

@wenjlu-lgy Also please have a look at CI check errors.

[wenjlu-lgy]

@Juliehzl CI check errors are fixed.

[yungezz]

Hi @Juliehzl what's status of this PR? is it ok to merge? if yes, could you pls merge it?

[Juliehzl]

Waiting for ARM signed off.

Hi @Juliehzl what's status of this PR? is it ok to merge? if yes, could you pls merge it?

[wenjlu-lgy]

@ryansbenson Could you help to take a look?

[KrisBash]

ARM comments appear to be resolved

[wenjlu-lgy]

@Juliehzl ARM team has already signed off. Could you help to review it?

[Juliehzl]

@Juliehzl ARM team has already signed off. Could you help to review it?

@wenjlu-lgy Definitely. Meanwhile can you try to make CI pass?

[wenjlu-lgy]

@Juliehzl ARM team has already signed off. Could you help to review it?

@wenjlu-lgy Definitely. Meanwhile can you try to make CI pass?

@Juliehzl Done.

[Juliehzl]

@wenjlu-lgy Your swagger specification looks good in general. But out of curiosity, what is the difference between Storage and Storage.Admin Service Provider?

[wenjlu-lgy]

@wenjlu-lgy Your swagger specification looks good in general. But out of curiosity, what is the difference between Storage and Storage.Admin Service Provider?

Storage.Admin is for admin scenario and Storage is for tenant scenario. There are some operations which can only be done by administrator only (like list storage accounts from all tenants).

[wenjlu-lgy]

@wenjlu-lgy Your swagger specification looks good in general. But out of curiosity, what is the difference between Storage and Storage.Admin Service Provider?

Storage.Admin is for admin scenario and Storage is for tenant scenario. There are some operations which can only be done by administrator only (like list storage accounts from all tenants).

@Juliehzl Any other concern about the pr?

[Juliehzl]

@wenjlu-lgy Thanks for your explanation. Approved.