-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
Migrate devcenter to TypeSpec #36201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Next Steps to MergeNext steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
|
|
PR validation pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment. |
API Change CheckAPIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews
|
...ion/devcenter/resource-manager/Microsoft.DevCenter/preview/2025-07-01-preview/devcenter.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Besides the |
snehanagendra
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
DevCenter TypeSpec conversion --------- Co-authored-by: Pan Shao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: mcgallan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: tadelesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yuchao Yan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Arber Hila <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: xiaofeicao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Arber Hila <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: mcgallan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Mike Harder <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jiao Di (MSFT) <[email protected]>
This PR migrates your latest version (identified by the tag in your readme.md) of swagger to TypeSpec. We already tried our best to make sure the TypeSpec represents same as previous swagger. Since we lack the business knowledge, please validate this PR again to make sure it's functional equivalent as before. The local validation step is at Getting started | TypeSpec Azure
Besides, TypeSpec encourages to follow ARM guidelines. Therefore, some representations in your previous swagger will be fixed to follow these guidelines. When you see differences in your local validation, please keep this note in mind. Here is the list you need to pay attention:
Please reach out to TypeSpec Discussions Channel if there is any help needed.