[Hub Generated] Publish private branch 'validate'#24608
[Hub Generated] Publish private branch 'validate'#24608
Conversation
|
The PR is created based on the updates in the private branch. The updates in the PR has already been reviewed and approved with this PR Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/12081 |
|
Hi, @RBANSALMS Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
MISSING_README |
Can not find readme.md in the folder. If no readme.md file, it will block SDK generation. folder: resource-manager/Microsoft.SCOM/preview/2022-09-13-preview |
️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️❌~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.
️❌SwaggerAPIView: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
Failed to generate swagger APIView. The readme file format is invalid and the tag is not defined. Use the provided readme template for guidance readme template. For more details, please check the detail log. |
"How to fix":"Check the readme file and make sure the readme file format is valid and the tag is defined. Use the provided readme template" |
️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️❌ModelValidation: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] |
"role":"Model Validation", "url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/f59f1d42f2f59b1917a5cb06b64b95d8a694be48/specification/scom/resource-manager/Microsoft.SCOM/preview/2022-09-13-preview/scom.json" |
️❌SemanticValidation: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
INTERNAL_ERROR |
Unexpected internal error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/scom/resource-manager/Microsoft.SCOM/preview/2022-09-13-preview/examples/Operations_List.json' Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/scom/resource-manager/Microsoft.SCOM/preview/2022-09-13-preview/examples/Operations_List.json' JsonUrl: Microsoft.SCOM/preview/2022-09-13-preview/scom.json |
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for CadlValidation.
️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
️❌PR Summary: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
RestBuild error |
"logUrl":"https://apidrop.visualstudio.com/Content%20CI/_build/results?buildId=370288&view=logs&j=fd490c07-0b22-5182-fac9-6d67fe1e939b", "detail":"Run.ps1 failed with exit code 1 " |
️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Breaking Changes Tracking
|
Swagger pipeline started successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment. |
|
Issue for management client library name : |
|
Hi @RBANSALMS! Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI issues, if present, in following order:
If you need further help, please reach out on the Teams channel aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel. |
|
Hi @RBANSALMS This PR was flagged for introducing a new RP namespace that is not being onboarded with RPaaS. Merging this PR to the main branch will be blocked as RPaaS is required for new RPs. To resolve this and allow the PR to be merged into the main branch, please use RPaaS to onboard the new RP. |
|
Hi, @RBANSALMS, our workflow has detected that there is no management SDK ever released for your RP, to further process SDK onboard for your RP, you should have the SDK client library name of your RP reviewed and approved. Impact: SDK release owner will take the approved management client library name to release SDK. No client library name approval will leads to SDK release delayed. |
New rp namsespaces must be onboarded with rpaas. Can you please fix this ? |
|
Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer. |
|
Regarding your comment regarding "New rp namsespaces must be onboarded with rpaas", we are already onbroaded to RPaas. I have other concerns wrt to this PR: 1. I had opened this PR via Openapihib by providing the latest PR for our RP from the Private repo. But it seems that this PR does not include all the files from the private repo, it does include only one file "specification/scom/resource-manager/Microsoft.SCOM/preview/2022-09-13-preview/scom.json", but all other files from the private repo are not included in this PR. Ideally all the files from the private repo should be part of this PR to be merged into the public repo, right?
Please feel free to redirect. |
|
@raosuhas , please help me in getting unblocked. |
|
Opened manually generated PR. #24803 Closing this PR. |

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request
Purpose of this PR
What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!
Due diligence checklist
To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:
ARM resource provider contract and
REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
I understand this is required before I can request review from an ARM API Review board.
ARM API changes review
ARMReviewlabel.ARMReviewlabel, if appropriate.If this happens, proceed according to guidance given in GitHub comments also added by the automation.
Breaking change review
If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy,
follow the process outlined in the High-level Breaking Change Process doc.
Getting help
and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.