Skip to content

Correct parameter name and configuration for Radius server for VPNGat…#1484

Merged
veronicagg merged 1 commit intoAzure:currentfrom
ritwikbasu:current
Jul 28, 2017
Merged

Correct parameter name and configuration for Radius server for VPNGat…#1484
veronicagg merged 1 commit intoAzure:currentfrom
ritwikbasu:current

Conversation

@ritwikbasu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ritwikbasu ritwikbasu commented Jul 28, 2017

…eways

Correct parameter name and configuration for Radius server for
VPNGateways

This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

…eways

Correct parameter name and configuration for Radius server for
VPNGateways
@azuresdkciprbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi There,

I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result:

File: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 151 Error(s): 84
After the PR: Warning(s): 151 Error(s): 84

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues

Send feedback and make AutoRest Linter Azure Bot smarter day by day!

Thanks for your co-operation.

@veronicagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ritwikbasu is this a bug fix? or is the service changing? Looks like the properties are moved to another model and renamed, so it's a breaking change.
@ravbhatnagar please take a look.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@veronicagg veronicagg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change is small, but it's a breaking change so posted some questions.

@veronicagg veronicagg added potential-sdk-breaking-change WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jul 28, 2017
@ritwikbasu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This is a bug fix - the person who wrote the initial changes was unaware of the mapping conventions between rest-api and NRP contract names and used the incorrect parameter names and the incorrect structure.

Also, this feature is currently under development and has not been exposed to customers yet. This issue was caught in our powershell testing for this same feature and hence the bugfix.

@veronicagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ritwikbasu thanks for clarifying, also based on our offline conversation the service is deployed, behind a feature flag.

@veronicagg veronicagg merged commit fec2a8d into Azure:current Jul 28, 2017
@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No modification for AutorestCI/azure-sdk-for-node

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

potential-sdk-breaking-change WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants