-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
More External Auth validation, tests and some fixes #2426
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| ), | ||
| expectedCSExternalAuth: getBaseCSExternalAuthBuilder().Clients( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JameelB These expectedCSExternalAuth represent what we will send to CS
mbarnes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good for the most part. In the RP-to-CS conversion, I suggest we skip setting builder fields to empty strings.
|
a part from the changes above LGTM |
This field is required and therefore will always have a value.
Replaces UsernameClaimPrefixPolicyTypeUnset. This will be the default value.
2050353 to
c69f83f
Compare
c96336c to
d91082a
Compare
|
@mbarnes and @SudoBrendan or @bennerv can this be merged now or is there additional work needed? |
This PR replaces: #2245