feat: IPA documentation by Rumata888 · Pull Request #4924 · AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

Rumata888 · 2024-03-04T17:03:47Z

The main goal of this PR is to add documentation to the IPA that can be viewed in doxygen. However, it also coincides with a slight refactor of the class:

Using a mutex for multithreading instead of a vector of values
Fixing the ipa benchmark

It also updates the doxygen file and adds a command "build_docs" to cmake for convenience

AztecBot · 2024-03-05T21:49:09Z

Benchmark results

Metrics with a significant change:

note_history_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms (10): 4,079 (+77%)
note_history_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms (5): 265 (+343%)

Detailed results

All benchmarks are run on txs on the Benchmarking contract on the repository. Each tx consists of a batch call to create_note and increment_balance, which guarantees that each tx has a private call, a nested private call, a public call, and a nested public call, as well as an emitted private note, an unencrypted log, and public storage read and write.

This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here.

Values are compared against data from master at commit f74e6a1f and shown if the difference exceeds 1%.

L2 block published to L1

Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.

Metric	8 txs	32 txs	64 txs
l1_rollup_calldata_size_in_bytes	5,700	18,884	36,452
l1_rollup_calldata_gas	66,036	239,036	469,028
l1_rollup_execution_gas	193,984	500,342	908,286
l2_block_processing_time_in_ms	1,183	4,469 (+1%)	8,734 (-1%)
note_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms	203 (+2%)	537	976 (-1%)
note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms	9.00 (+12%)	62.3 (+9%)	112 (-9%)
l2_block_building_time_in_ms	16,627 (+3%)	63,729 (-1%)	127,309
l2_block_rollup_simulation_time_in_ms	12,625 (+3%)	48,584	96,938 (-1%)
l2_block_public_tx_process_time_in_ms	3,973 (+4%)	15,075 (-4%)	30,246

L2 chain processing

Each column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 16 txs.

Metric	5 blocks	10 blocks
node_history_sync_time_in_ms	14,335 (+4%)	28,717 (+9%)
note_history_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms	1,219 (+1%)	⚠️ 4,079 (+77%)
note_history_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms	⚠️ 265 (+343%)	145 (+42%)
node_database_size_in_bytes	18,767,952	35,545,168
pxe_database_size_in_bytes	29,923	59,478

Circuits stats

Stats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every circuit run across all benchmarks.

Circuit	circuit_simulation_time_in_ms	circuit_input_size_in_bytes	circuit_output_size_in_bytes
private-kernel-init	265 (+8%)	44,736	28,001
private-kernel-ordering	205 (+9%)	52,625	14,627
base-rollup	1,438 (+13%)	177,932	933
root-rollup	70.9 (+3%)	4,192	825
private-kernel-inner	340 (+9%)	73,715	28,001
public-kernel-app-logic	203 (+6%)	32,254	25,379
merge-rollup	5.80 (+4%)	2,712	933

Tree insertion stats

The duration to insert a fixed batch of leaves into each tree type.

Metric	1 leaves	2 leaves	8 leaves	16 leaves	32 leaves	64 leaves	128 leaves	512 leaves	1024 leaves	2048 leaves	4096 leaves
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_ms	10.4 (+8%)	10.9 (+7%)	12.4 (-11%)	16.7 (+6%)	22.4 (+2%)	35.0 (-1%)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_count	16.9	17.5	23.0	31.6	47.0	79.0	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_ms	0.603 (+8%)	0.605 (+6%)	0.525 (-11%)	0.514 (+6%)	0.467 (+2%)	0.437 (-1%)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	49.0 (+10%)	72.3 (+2%)	230	475 (+11%)	864	1,686 (-2%)
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_count	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	96.0	159	543	1,055	2,079	4,127
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.503 (+10%)	0.446 (+2%)	0.419	0.445 (+11%)	0.411	0.405 (-2%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	58.2 (+11%)	107 (+2%)	335 (-1%)	715 (+13%)	1,303	2,572 (-1%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_count	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	104	207	691	1,363	2,707	5,395
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.519 (+11%)	0.482 (+2%)	0.456	0.493 (+13%)	0.453	0.447 (-1%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	63.7 (+6%)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_count	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	109	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.558 (+6%)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Miscellaneous

Transaction sizes based on how many contracts are deployed in the tx.

Metric	0 deployed contracts
tx_size_in_bytes	19,179

Transaction processing duration by data writes.

Metric	0 new note hashes	1 new note hashes
tx_pxe_processing_time_ms	2,630 (+2%)	1,451 (+8%)

Metric	0 public data writes	1 public data writes
tx_sequencer_processing_time_ms	0.0297	496 (+6%)

Rumata888 · 2024-03-05T22:39:14Z

barretenberg/cpp/CMakeLists.txt

+# Add doxygen build command
+find_package(Doxygen)
+if (DOXYGEN_FOUND)
+add_custom_target(build_docs 


This adds a command, so that it's easier to rebuild docs

could you clarify more on how to use it?

Added information to the readme

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/benchmark/ipa_bench/ipa.bench.cpp

Rumata888 · 2024-03-05T22:40:17Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

 /**
- * @brief IPA (inner-product argument) commitment scheme class. Conforms to the specification
- * https://hackmd.io/q-A8y6aITWyWJrvsGGMWNA?view.
+ * @brief IPA (inner product argument) commitment scheme class.


Rumata888 · 2024-03-05T22:40:59Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

     * @param transcript Prover transcript
     * https://github.com/AztecProtocol/aztec-packages/pull/3434
+     *
+     *@details For a vector \f$\vec{v}=(v_0,v_1,...,v_{2n-1})\f$ of length \f$2n\f$ we'll denote


Rumata888 · 2024-03-05T22:42:29Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

     *
     * @return true/false depending on if the proof verifies
+     *
+     * @details The procedure runs as follows:


Rumata888 · 2024-03-05T23:07:03Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

-            // Run scalar product in parallel
-            run_loop_in_parallel_if_effective_with_index(
+            // Run scalar products in parallel
+            run_loop_in_parallel_if_effective(


We are not accessing a vector any more, so we don't need the thread index

Rumata888 · 2024-03-05T23:07:50Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

-         * b_zero = g(evaluation) = ∏_{i ∈ [k]} (1 + u_{k-i}^{-1}. (evaluation)^{2^{i-1}})
-         */
+        //  Step 6.
+        // Compute b_zero where b_zero can be computed using the polynomial:


"/**
*
*/" Comments go into docs :(

hm, that's unfortunate

lucasxia01

Thanks for the documentation and the comments! Left some requests for small changes and clarifications.

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-06T16:51:16Z

barretenberg/cpp/docs/Doxyfile

@@ -1,19 +1,2738 @@
-# Minimal Doxyfile. See https://www.doxygen.nl/manual/config.html
+# Doxyfile 1.9.6


where was this copied from?

From Cody's branch :). I made some adjustments to parallelize the build somewhat, but it only took off 5 seconds

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-06T16:54:39Z

barretenberg/cpp/CMakeLists.txt

+# Add doxygen build command
+find_package(Doxygen)
+if (DOXYGEN_FOUND)
+add_custom_target(build_docs 


could you clarify more on how to use it?

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/benchmark/ipa_bench/ipa.bench.cpp

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-06T17:07:47Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

+ *1. Originally we have two vectors \f$\vec{a}\f$ and \f$\vec{b}\f$, which the product of which we want to prove, but
+ *the prover can't just send vector \f$\vec{a}\f$ to the verifier, it can only provide a commitment
+ \f$\langle\vec{a},\vec{G}\rangle\f$
+ *2. The verifier computes the \f$C'=C+f(\beta)\cdot U\f$ to "bind" together the


C should be defined

you're also mixing the notation using f vs the notation using a and b which is confusing

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-06T18:34:30Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

                                      const std::shared_ptr<NativeTranscript>& transcript)
    {
        ASSERT(opening_pair.challenge != 0 && "The challenge point should not be zero");
-        auto poly_degree = static_cast<size_t>(polynomial.size());


how about poly_length instead of poly_degree_plus_1? just a suggestion.

Left the same in the manifest, but changed the name of the variable

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-06T18:37:54Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

+                 &inner_prod_L,
+                 &inner_prod_R
+#ifndef NO_MULTITHREADING
+                 ,


can't this comma be put on the previous line?

No, build starts failing

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-06T18:40:17Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

-                    partial_inner_prod_R[workload_index] = current_inner_prod_R;
+                    // Update the accumulated results thread-safely
+                    {
+#ifndef NO_MULTITHREADING


what's the performance impact from switching to this?

Before

After

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-06T18:41:18Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

-         * b_zero = g(evaluation) = ∏_{i ∈ [k]} (1 + u_{k-i}^{-1}. (evaluation)^{2^{i-1}})
-         */
+        //  Step 6.
+        // Compute b_zero where b_zero can be computed using the polynomial:


hm, that's unfortunate

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-06T19:00:58Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp


+            // Step 6.1
            // L_i = < a_vec_lo, G_vec_hi > + inner_prod_L * aux_generator
-            L_elements[i] = bb::scalar_multiplication::pippenger_without_endomorphism_basis_points<Curve>(


why did we store these before?

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-06T19:12:04Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

+#endif
+        // Step 6.
+        // Perform IPA reduction rounds
        for (size_t i = 0; i < log_poly_degree; i++) {


could flip this backwards to align with documentation

Forgot to do that. One of the reasons I got rid of the vectors

Actually, the index in the manifest is correct. I'm just iterating like this for simplicity, so I'd prefer not to change it

lucasxia01

Looks good! Left minor remark regarding step numbering.

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-07T16:17:53Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/commitment_schemes/ipa/ipa.hpp

-            std::string index = std::to_string(i);
-            transcript->send_to_verifier("IPA:L_" + index, Commitment(L_elements[i]));
-            transcript->send_to_verifier("IPA:R_" + index, Commitment(R_elements[i]));
+            // Step 6.3


can these change to 6a, b, c, d, e like the documentation?

🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- <details><summary>aztec-package: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](aztec-package-v0.26.5...aztec-package-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Miscellaneous * **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions </details> <details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](barretenberg.js-v0.26.5...barretenberg.js-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Miscellaneous * **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions </details> <details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](aztec-cli-v0.26.5...aztec-cli-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract ([#5059](#5059)) ([cb9fdc6](cb9fdc6)) </details> <details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](aztec-packages-v0.26.5...aztec-packages-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * Basic public reverts ([#4870](#4870)) ([5cccc78](5cccc78)) * Deploying new inbox ([#5036](#5036)) ([fed729d](fed729d)) * Detect unknown note type ids in compute_note_hash ([#5086](#5086)) ([6206bec](6206bec)) * Easy deployment of protocol contracts in e2e ([#4983](#4983)) ([480161f](480161f)) * IPA documentation ([#4924](#4924)) ([48bd22e](48bd22e)) * Nullifier read requests in public kernel ([#4910](#4910)) ([0e44247](0e44247)) * Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract ([#5059](#5059)) ([cb9fdc6](cb9fdc6)) * Updating an SMT solver class ([#4981](#4981)) ([4b94d58](4b94d58)) ### Bug Fixes * Canonical contract address ([#5030](#5030)) ([b2af880](b2af880)) * Flaky deployment test ([#5035](#5035)) ([039eafc](039eafc)) * Pull the correct platform image for noir ([#5097](#5097)) ([3342371](3342371)) * Sleep function memory leak ([#5023](#5023)) ([a72cfea](a72cfea)), closes [#4817](#4817) * Storage v2 ([#5027](#5027)) ([fe3190e](fe3190e)) * Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies ([#5066](#5066)) ([507c374](507c374)) ### Miscellaneous * Address warnings in noir test suite ([#4966](#4966)) ([7ef4ef5](7ef4ef5)) * Bootstrap noir natively if nargo is invalid ([#5034](#5034)) ([df089de](df089de)) * Build avm transpiler if we are on mac ([#5039](#5039)) ([c2966b9](c2966b9)) * **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests ([#5065](#5065)) ([58e1ff4](58e1ff4)) * Cleanup of prover and verifier instances ([#4959](#4959)) ([f2fdefd](f2fdefd)) * Delete bootstrap scripts from `noir/noir-repo` ([#5044](#5044)) ([add91ca](add91ca)) * Disable `hello_world_example` noir test in aztec-packages CI ([#5061](#5061)) ([1be9243](1be9243)) * Join-split example Part 1 ([#4965](#4965)) ([b9de0f5](b9de0f5)) * Moving RootRollupInputs impl ([#5087](#5087)) ([f3d9f9b](f3d9f9b)) * Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops are populated through function ([#5084](#5084)) ([77954ab](77954ab)) ### Documentation * Parity circuit naming fixes ([#5076](#5076)) ([c255255](c255255)) </details> <details><summary>barretenberg: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](barretenberg-v0.26.5...barretenberg-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * IPA documentation ([#4924](#4924)) ([48bd22e](48bd22e)) * Updating an SMT solver class ([#4981](#4981)) ([4b94d58](4b94d58)) ### Bug Fixes * Storage v2 ([#5027](#5027)) ([fe3190e](fe3190e)) * Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies ([#5066](#5066)) ([507c374](507c374)) ### Miscellaneous * **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests ([#5065](#5065)) ([58e1ff4](58e1ff4)) * Cleanup of prover and verifier instances ([#4959](#4959)) ([f2fdefd](f2fdefd)) * Join-split example Part 1 ([#4965](#4965)) ([b9de0f5](b9de0f5)) * Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops are populated through function ([#5084](#5084)) ([77954ab](77954ab)) </details> --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- <details><summary>aztec-package: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-package-v0.26.5...aztec-package-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Miscellaneous * **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions </details> <details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg.js-v0.26.5...barretenberg.js-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Miscellaneous * **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions </details> <details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-cli-v0.26.5...aztec-cli-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract ([#5059](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5059)) ([cb9fdc6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@cb9fdc6)) </details> <details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-packages-v0.26.5...aztec-packages-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * Basic public reverts ([#4870](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4870)) ([5cccc78](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@5cccc78)) * Deploying new inbox ([#5036](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5036)) ([fed729d](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fed729d)) * Detect unknown note type ids in compute_note_hash ([#5086](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5086)) ([6206bec](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@6206bec)) * Easy deployment of protocol contracts in e2e ([#4983](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4983)) ([480161f](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@480161f)) * IPA documentation ([#4924](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4924)) ([48bd22e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@48bd22e)) * Nullifier read requests in public kernel ([#4910](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4910)) ([0e44247](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@0e44247)) * Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract ([#5059](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5059)) ([cb9fdc6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@cb9fdc6)) * Updating an SMT solver class ([#4981](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4981)) ([4b94d58](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4b94d58)) ### Bug Fixes * Canonical contract address ([#5030](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5030)) ([b2af880](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b2af880)) * Flaky deployment test ([#5035](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5035)) ([039eafc](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@039eafc)) * Pull the correct platform image for noir ([#5097](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5097)) ([3342371](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3342371)) * Sleep function memory leak ([#5023](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5023)) ([a72cfea](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a72cfea)), closes [#4817](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4817) * Storage v2 ([#5027](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5027)) ([fe3190e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fe3190e)) * Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies ([#5066](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5066)) ([507c374](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@507c374)) ### Miscellaneous * Address warnings in noir test suite ([#4966](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4966)) ([7ef4ef5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@7ef4ef5)) * Bootstrap noir natively if nargo is invalid ([#5034](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5034)) ([df089de](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@df089de)) * Build avm transpiler if we are on mac ([#5039](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5039)) ([c2966b9](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c2966b9)) * **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests ([#5065](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5065)) ([58e1ff4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e1ff4)) * Cleanup of prover and verifier instances ([#4959](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4959)) ([f2fdefd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f2fdefd)) * Delete bootstrap scripts from `noir/noir-repo` ([#5044](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5044)) ([add91ca](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@add91ca)) * Disable `hello_world_example` noir test in aztec-packages CI ([#5061](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5061)) ([1be9243](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@1be9243)) * Join-split example Part 1 ([#4965](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965)) ([b9de0f5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b9de0f5)) * Moving RootRollupInputs impl ([#5087](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5087)) ([f3d9f9b](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f3d9f9b)) * Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops are populated through function ([#5084](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5084)) ([77954ab](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@77954ab)) ### Documentation * Parity circuit naming fixes ([#5076](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5076)) ([c255255](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c255255)) </details> <details><summary>barretenberg: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg-v0.26.5...barretenberg-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * IPA documentation ([#4924](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4924)) ([48bd22e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@48bd22e)) * Updating an SMT solver class ([#4981](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4981)) ([4b94d58](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4b94d58)) ### Bug Fixes * Storage v2 ([#5027](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5027)) ([fe3190e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fe3190e)) * Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies ([#5066](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5066)) ([507c374](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@507c374)) ### Miscellaneous * **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests ([#5065](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5065)) ([58e1ff4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e1ff4)) * Cleanup of prover and verifier instances ([#4959](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4959)) ([f2fdefd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f2fdefd)) * Join-split example Part 1 ([#4965](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965)) ([b9de0f5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b9de0f5)) * Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops are populated through function ([#5084](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5084)) ([77954ab](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@77954ab)) </details> --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Rumata888 commented Mar 5, 2024

View reviewed changes

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/benchmark/ipa_bench/ipa.bench.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved

Rumata888 commented Mar 5, 2024

View reviewed changes

Rumata888 marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2024 22:46

Rumata888 added 9 commits March 5, 2024 22:46

Doxygen file and build command

47c40b3

pain

0e92513

better docs

2a0c45e

Benchmark fixes

217a041

Docs

e45d844

Update "compute_opening_proof" in line with docs

34694b3

Finish and format

c2ad41b

Fix build

2dfc7bd

minifix

c947f64

Rumata888 force-pushed the is/documenting_ipa_take_2 branch from 288ba3d to c947f64 Compare March 5, 2024 22:46

restore format

5e44482

Rumata888 self-assigned this Mar 5, 2024

Rumata888 added A-documentation Area: relates to documentation crypto cryptography labels Mar 5, 2024

Rumata888 commented Mar 5, 2024

View reviewed changes

lucasxia01 suggested changes Mar 6, 2024

View reviewed changes

Rumata888 added 5 commits March 7, 2024 13:42

Added info to the docs

225e93c

address Luke's comments

173ffaa

Fix back

4373bd2

Formatting

3b2aa79

comma

fb8a6f0

lucasxia01 approved these changes Mar 7, 2024

View reviewed changes

address

6656c13

Rumata888 enabled auto-merge (squash) March 7, 2024 17:05

Rumata888 merged commit 48bd22e into master Mar 7, 2024

Rumata888 deleted the is/documenting_ipa_take_2 branch March 7, 2024 17:06

AztecBot mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2024

chore(master): Release 0.26.6 #5037

Merged

		@@ -1,19 +1,2738 @@
		# Minimal Doxyfile. See https://www.doxygen.nl/manual/config.html
		# Doxyfile 1.9.6

Conversation

Rumata888 commented Mar 4, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AztecBot commented Mar 5, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmark results

L2 block published to L1

L2 chain processing

Circuits stats

Tree insertion stats

Miscellaneous

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Rumata888 Mar 5, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

lucasxia01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

lucasxia01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Rumata888 commented Mar 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

AztecBot commented Mar 5, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Rumata888 Mar 5, 2024 •

edited

Loading