docs(release): use versioned asset names - #393
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe release checklist documentation is updated to reference versioned installer asset filenames for macOS (arm64/x64) and Windows (x64), replacing unversioned URLs in the English and Chinese sections, with post-release verification steps adjusted accordingly. ChangesRelease Checklist Versioning
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Review rate limit: 9/10 reviews remaining, refill in 6 minutes. Comment |
Summary
Why
The release checklist still showed unversioned asset names in the Release Notes template and verifier summary, which could point maintainers at the wrong GitHub release assets.
Related Issue
No linked issue; this is a small release-process documentation fix.
Human Review Status
Pending. A human should make the final merge decision after reviewing the final diff and verification evidence.
Review Focus
Please confirm the placeholder asset names match the verifier's
pawwork-<platform>-<arch>-X.Y.Znaming convention.Risk Notes
None. Documentation-only change.
How To Verify
Screenshots or Recordings
Not required; no visible UI changes.
Checklist
dev, and my PR title and commit messages use Conventional Commits in EnglishMaintainer labeling request: please add appropriate type, scope, and priority labels if needed.
Summary by CodeRabbit