Skip to content

fix: add integration icon for HACS/HA display#10

Merged
Artic0din merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hacs-icon
Apr 6, 2026
Merged

fix: add integration icon for HACS/HA display#10
Artic0din merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hacs-icon

Conversation

@Artic0din
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Add icon.png (192x192) and icon@2x.png (512x512) to custom_components/pricehawk/
  • HACS and HA look for icons at this path — they were previously only in logos/ which isn't scanned

Test plan

  • HACS integration page shows PriceHawk icon instead of "icon not available"
  • Settings > Devices & Services shows the icon

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Copy PriceHawk icon to custom_components/pricehawk/ where HACS and HA
look for it:
- icon.png (192x192) — standard display
- icon@2x.png (512x512) — retina display

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • custom_components/pricehawk/icon.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • custom_components/pricehawk/icon@2x.png is excluded by !**/*.png

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ad3b7d47-4cbf-41fd-9075-a70678402d6b

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/hacs-icon

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Artic0din Artic0din merged commit 0617419 into main Apr 6, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant