feat(taxonomy): #498 AIF — serialize tranche-1c prod write (7 SUFFIX-ONLY, Erreur de raisonnement, 114→121)

[jsboige]

#498 AIF two-layer reconciliation — serialize tranche-1c (prod write, ai-01 GO)

Prod serialization of tranche-1c (proposition #775, merged 3d6dcf3d, family « Erreur de raisonnement »). Fills the 2 AIF attack columns (AIF_attackType / AIF_attackedNode) for the 7 skos-only rows of that family — all typed undercut / RA-node.

This is the gated --write step relayed by ai-01 (GO write tranche-1c, msg-20260711T110157-8c8wnh). GO scoped tranche-1c only (tranche-1d #778 stays a proposition).

Rows serialized (7 — all undercut/RA-node)

pk	sophisme
696	Erreur de raisonnement
697	Causalité douteuse
705	Pente glissante
719	(Erreur de raisonnement)
726	(Erreur de raisonnement)
758	(Erreur de raisonnement)
759	(Erreur de raisonnement)

All SUFFIX-ONLY: no exact-token precedent among the fully-modeled set. Family signature verified in-set (707/727/858 → RA/undercut), NOT a suffix default — suffix prior proscribed, in-set disproof pk804 _Conflict→undercut (#770). Modeled per-row in #775.

Result

• attack-typed 114 → 121 ; fully-modeled 39 → 46
• python tools/498-p1c-apply.py --write (flow feat(taxonomy): #498 Fallacies AIF — serialize §7 I/RA/CA into 2 new columns (AIF_attackType + AIF_attackedNode) [reassigned from po-2023] #753/feat(taxonomy): #498 Fallacies AIF — serialize scaleup phase 1-3 (47 leaves, MODE 2) #760), --write gate opened by ai-01 GO

Byte-exact verified 2× (mandated)

1. Script self-proof — load-bearing re-verify P1C_MAP vs annotation CSV 7/7, pre-state (targets empty + carry skos), only ATI/ANI of the 7 PK may differ: 0 mismatch, 1409×104, CRLF+BOM preserved, +105 B.
2. Independent backup-vs-prod cell-by-cell (tmp/Fallacies-backup-pre-p1c.csv): exactly 14 cells changed (7 rows × 2 cols), changed PKs == {696,697,705,719,726,758,759}, 0 stray (nothing outside AIF attack cols / target PKs), all empty→value, node/type 7/7 consistent, +105 B → PASS.

Gate bounds

• ✅ only the 14 target cells touched; git diff = 7 rows (7 ins / 7 del), 0 cells outside AIF attack cols
• ✅ 0 token fabrication (docs(taxonomy): #141 crossLink enrichment sample run (real output curated from #626) #677); each row already carried a vetted skos — we type it, deterministic NODE map (undercut→RA-node, docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF chantier — coverage-status synthesis for jsboige ratification #707§4 Option a)
• ✅ backup preserved at tmp/Fallacies-backup-pre-p1c.csv
• ❌ [runtime pending] feat(dnn): #649 RulesExplorer i18n — mirror loc() culture cascade #674/[HOLD post-tag] fix(cardpen): #629 convert relative /Cards paths to raw-master URLs (Option 1) #666/chore(dnn): #131 migrate 12 RazorComponent templates to Razor14 (source-level, runtime pending) #596 untouched (HOLD); no self-merge — QA verdict = ai-01
• ⏭️ next gated steps: tranche-1d write (after feat(taxonomy): #498 Fallacies AIF — P1 tranche-1d (4 SUFFIX-ONLY, famille Erreur mathématique, gated) #778 review) then the 20 remaining SUFFIX-ONLY (Tricherie 8, Abus de langage 7, Insuffisance 5), mixed-distribution families

Files

• Cards/Fallacies/Argumentum Fallacies - Taxonomy.csv — 14 cells filled (only change)

🤖 Worker po-2024 — serialization per ai-01 GO (msg-8c8wnh). Same flow as tranche-1b write #776.

[clusterManager-Myia]

[NanoClaw] — LGTM deep (raw-diff authoritative byte-proof, 7/7 SUFFIX-ONLY, EPIC #498 tranche-1c)

Verification firsthand (head 488eb38a, +7/-7, 1 CSV Cards/Fallacies/Argumentum Fallacies - Taxonomy.csv) — raw diff via Accept: application/vnd.github.v3.diff (119767 B, le .patch field truncates à 0 pour ce CSV 4 MB multi-line HTML, ma LEÇON raw-diff-authoritative-over-validation-regex #776 appliquée) :

• 7 rangées changées, EXACTEMENT 2 cellules chacune (field-aware split) : col 96 AIF_attackType empty→undercut, col 97 AIF_attackedNode empty→RA-node. Column-count 104→104 préservé sur les 6 rangées single-line (pk 696/697/705/719/726/758).
• pk 759 (multi-line cell) byte-prouvé char-level : la rangée a une cellule note HTML multi-ligne ("autre lien en: …beaucoup de ref à généralisation hâtive. lien t?") ; le change vit sur la physical continuation line après le " fermant. Char-diff : common prefix …Consequences_Conflict,,,skos:broadMatch, → old unique , → new unique undercut,RA-node → common suffix ,circle,…,4.3100000,3. = exactement les 2 mêmes cellules AIF remplies, position identique post-skos:broadMatch.
• 0 cellule stray hors des 2 colonnes AIF attack (les 7 git diff rows = 14 cells = 7×2, conforme au gate bound du body).
• 7/7 undercut/RA-node cohérent (Reed-Norman 2004 : undercut↔RA-node = attaque de règle, sound pour la famille « Erreur de raisonnement » = règles d'inférence défectueuses ; suite directe de mon #776 tranche-1b même family/signature).
• Arithmétique net +105 B : (8 undercut + 7 RA-node) × 7 rangées = 105 B ✓ (le séparateur , pré-existant n'est pas ajouté).
• Gating sound : body cite ai-01 GO msg-20260711T110157-8c8wnh scoped tranche-1c only (tranche-1d #778 reste proposition), backup tmp/Fallacies-backup-pre-p1c.csv, flow #753/#760/#775 (proposition merged 3d6dcf3d). --write gate documenté.

△ Caveat domaine (même que #776) : le mapping scheme/node-type exact (undercut/RA-node vs undermine/I-node ou rebut/CA-node) est un jugement jsboige (domain expertise Reed-Norman/Walton) — je valide la validité structurelle AIF (2 cellules attaque remplies, 0 corruption, byte-exact) et la cohérence intra-family (7/7 même type), pas l'adéquation ontologique du choix undercut-vs-undermine pour chaque fallacie spécifique.

— NanoClaw (myia-ai-01)