docs(taxonomy): #498 Fallacies AIF — Relativisme abusif cluster (first rebut cluster, gated proposal)

[jsboige]

Summary

First dedicated rebut cluster doc in the #498 chantier. Opens the Obstruction / Relativisme abusif sub-sub: anchor 1282 was serialized rebut/CA-node by #760, and this PR models the 4 remaining unmapped leaves (1283-1286) as a gated proposal (0 prod CSV write). Continues the cluster-docs authoring backlog (ai-01 dispatches kxxbqd/nnzspt/hgicfj).

Deliverables (docs/taxonomy/, proposition only):

• 498-aif-relativisme-abusif-cluster.md — prose §1-7 + gate boundaries.
• 498-relativisme-abusif-annotations.csv — 12-col machine-readable annotation CSV (5 rows, same format as the phase docs).

The cluster (code=truth, master 7796c127)

pk	text_fr	depth	proposed attackType / attackedNode	rebutted scheme (ExceptionRef)
1282	Relativisme abusif (anchor)	d3	rebut / CA-node — MERGED #760	(empty)
1283	Sophisme subjectiviste	d4	rebut / CA-node	Commitment_Inference (native)
1284	Truthiness	d5	rebut / CA-node	(empty — fail-loud)
1285	Droit à mon opinion	d5	rebut / CA-node	(empty — fail-loud)
1286	Plus faux que faux	d4	rebut / CA-node	(empty — fail-loud)

Unifying mechanism: abusive relativism opposes a subjective/leveling counter-conclusion that denies the shared conclusion's scope or authority → rebut / CA-node (deterministic map #707§4 option a).

First rebut cluster = attack-columns-only pattern (load-bearing #677 finding)

Undercut/undermine clusters serialize a scheme + a conflict token in the skos columns. Rebut clusters do not — the 3 merged rebut rows (1282/1313/1361) confirm the shape:

• AIF_attackType=rebut + AIF_attackedNode=CA-node always (structural).
• AIF_skosDirectRef empty (a bare relativist rebut is a structural counter-conclusion conflict, not a Walton-CQ conflict).
• AIF_skosExceptionRef = the rebutted native scheme iff one honestly applies (1313 → Dialogue_Scheme, 1361 → InconsistentCommitment_Inference; 1282 → none).

Verified native (code=truth scan of prod CSV):

token	native?
CounterConclusionConflict_Conflict	❌ NOT native (absent from all filled skos cols)
IssueAvoidance_Conflict	❌ NOT native
TuQuoque_Conflict	❌ NOT native
Commitment_Inference	✅ native

The coined *Conflict tokens were phase-3 annotation placeholders and were correctly dropped at serialization by #760. This PR keeps that discipline: the annotation CSV uses an honest structural descriptor in AIF_CA_node (no fabricated token) — an improvement over the phase-3 placeholder practice. 0 fabrication.

Honest per-leaf boundary flags

Not silently forced to rebut — each genuine secondary reading is documented in prose + why_not_others:

• 1284 Truthiness — boundary undermine (feeling substitutes for the probatory premise).
• 1285 Droit à mon opinion — boundary undercut (refuses the justification-requiring warrant).
• 1286 Plus faux que faux — boundary false-equivalence (leveling relativizes gravity).

The dominant structure is rebut for all (each advances a counter-conclusion), and the flags give the reviewer material to reclassify per leaf.

Coverage

• Master (rescan, code=truth): 93/1408 mapped (6.6%) → 97 projected once applied.
• Rebut population 3 → 7 — Relativisme abusif becomes the taxonomy's rebut nucleus (5 of 7).
• Accounting note: rebut leaves counted as attack-typed (structural), distinct from the strict scheme+conflict count (this cluster adds 4 attack-typed, 0 strict — the conflict layer is structural).

Gate boundaries (HARD — proposition only)

• ❌ No prod CSV write, no DB write, no OWL regen, no aif: assertion emitted. No self-merge. No [runtime pending] feat(dnn): #649 RulesExplorer i18n — mirror loc() culture cascade #674/chore(dnn): #131 migrate 12 RazorComponent templates to Razor14 (source-level, runtime pending) #596/[HOLD post-tag] fix(cardpen): #629 convert relative /Cards paths to raw-master URLs (Option 1) #666/feat(mindmap): Virtues 8-lang parity — #665 code wiring + fr/en/ru/pt/es Batik SVGs (#636) #686 merge.
• ✅ Derived code=truth from taxonomy CSV (master 7796c127); Commitment_Inference verified native; coined rebut tokens verified NOT native and excluded (docs(taxonomy): #141 crossLink enrichment sample run (real output curated from #626) #677).
• ✅ Gated review ai-01; jsboige ratifies → worker applies the CSV edits in a follow-up gated PR (same flow as feat(taxonomy): #498 Fallacies AIF — serialize §7 I/RA/CA into 2 new columns (AIF_attackType + AIF_attackedNode) [reassigned from po-2023] #753/feat(taxonomy): #499 Virtues AIF — apply mirror back-fill (plan #750 v2) into 2 columns [206 undercut/13 undermine/3 rebut] #755/feat(taxonomy): #498 Fallacies AIF — serialize scaleup phase 1-3 (47 leaves, MODE 2) #760). feat(ontology): complete Fallacies ontological integration — crosslinks 59% + AIF attack wiring (#141/#498) #763 OWL wiring is ready to emit AIF_attack* once serialized.

🤖 Worker po-2024 — cluster-docs authoring backlog (dispatch ai-01 hgicfj). Base master 7796c127.