docs(taxonomy): #499 Virtues AIF PR-4 — Langage 5.1 Définitions claires cluster + résout borderline 804 - #745
Merged
Conversation
…es cluster + résout borderline 804 du back-fill plan Extends Virtues AIF I/RA/CA decomposition (schema #707§4 Option A ratified) with 4th cluster, covering family 5 Langage exact / subfamily 5.1 Définitions claires (5 leaves pk 137/138/139/140/141, scheme: Argument from Verbal Classification + Expert Opinion for pk140). Mirror Fallacies: Abus de langage 5.1.x (800 Acception vague, 804 Acception arbitraire, 826 Définition incohérente) + 855 Équivoque (5.3.2) + cross-family (667 Imprécision/Erreur math, 1345 Complication exagérée/Obstruction, 777 Inconsistance/Erreur raisonnement). Path-prefix 5.1↔5.1 EXACT (cleanest of 4 clusters: PR-1 4.1, PR-2 6.1, PR-4 5.1 all exact; PR-3 7.3 partial). KEY: RESOLVES borderline 804 from back-fill plan #744 §2a. Per-case analysis of the 800/804/826 definition-fallacy triad shows 3 distinct AIF attack-shapes: - 800 Acception vague (vagueness → inference indeterminate) → undercut/RA - 804 Acception arbitraire (fabricated definition → premise I-node false) → UNDERMINE/I (clean, no longer borderline) - 826 Définition incohérente (contradiction → inference inconsistent) → undercut/RA Verdict 804 refined: undermine/I-node (clean). Impact on back-fill plan #744: reclassify 804 from borderline-default-undercut → clean undermine/I. The 4 nodes opposing 804 (137/139/140 + check) move to mine/I. Updated expected distribution: ~13 undermine/I (9×889 + 4×804), ~209 undercut/RA, 0 rebut (~6% mine, still undercut-dominated ~94%). Distribution cluster 5.1: 3 undermine/I (804 ×3) + 7 undercut/RA. Mixed like PR-2. 0 rebut/CA. Undermine here is CONCENTRATED on content-fabrication fallacies (889 lie, 804 fabricated definition = asserting a false premise), not scattered. This refines the back-fill plan §2a discriminator: mine = asserting a fabricated premise, distinct from tool-misuse (undercut) and credibility-attacks (undercut). CUMULATIVE rebut-rarity (4 clusters / 4 families / 5 scheme-types / ~25 fallacy-instances): 0 rebut. Even on language schemes (Verbal Classification, Analogy) that could host counter-conclusions, rebut absent. Back-fill plan default-undercut + override-mine rule holds with no rebut case added. 2 schemes newly covered: Verbal Classification (21 nodes full-scale), Expert Opinion (6 nodes). Anti-duplication: grep confirmed no phase-2 doc covers 5.1 in I/RA/CA (additive layer). Discipline: 0 fabrication (#677), 804 borderline resolved per-case not forced, 667 borderline honestly excluded (imprecision = quality deficit = undercut, not false assertion), cross-family mirror documented. 0 write CSV/DB/OWL/Cards. Docs-only. Co-Authored-By: Claude-Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
4th cluster of Virtues AIF I/RA/CA decomposition (schema #707§4 Option A ratified). Covers family 5 Langage exact / subfamily 5.1 Définitions claires (5 leaves pk 137/138/139/140/141, scheme: Argument from Verbal Classification + Expert Opinion for pk140).
Follows PR #741 (PR-1), #742 (PR-2), #743 (PR-3), all merged at
53978690. Same method, new family. Docs-only, no code/CSV/DB/OWL writes.🔑 Key contribution — resolves borderline 804 from back-fill plan #744
The back-fill plan #744 §2a classified 804 Acception arbitraire as borderline (conservative default undercut/RA). This cluster resolves it per-case by analyzing the 800/804/826 definition-fallacy triad (Abus de langage 5.1.x):
Verdict 804 refined:
undermine / I-node(clean, no longer borderline). The 3 fallacies of definition fall under 3 distinct AIF attack-shapes — exactly the granularity the I/RA/CA decomposition serves to capture.Impact on back-fill plan #744:
What this PR adds
Cumulative rebut-rarity (4 clusters, load-bearing for Option)
rebut/CA-node = 0 across 4 families / 4 scheme-types / ~25 fallacy-instances. Even on language schemes (Verbal Classification, Analogy) that could host counter-conclusions, rebut stays absent. The back-fill plan default-undercut + override-mine rule holds with no rebut case added.
2 schemes newly covered: Verbal Classification (21 nodes full-scale), Expert Opinion (6 nodes).
Discipline
Cards/, 0 regen, 0 CSV/DB/OWL. Docs-only (+182 lines).Test impact
None — docs-only.
Request
Review + (if acceptable) merge. This cluster feeds back into PR #744 (back-fill plan) by resolving the 804 borderline → the plan's §2a table should be updated to reclassify 804 as clean undermine/I-node when ai-01 reviews #744. I'll note the dependency in the DONE report.
cc @jsboige (Option A FYI).
🤖 Worker po-2024 — [primaire] cluster 4 of dispatch
ompwhxdeep-queue.