docs(taxonomy): #498 PR-12 Equivoque / reification & magic-of-words cluster (2 modeled + 7 FAIL-LOUD) — completes sub-sub - #720
Merged
Conversation
…luster (2 modeled + 7 FAIL-LOUD) Twelfth cluster of the #498 AIF chantier. Third and final installment of the Equivoque sub-sub (Ambiguïté subfamily): the reification / magic-of- words / level-confusion mechanism (pk 867-875, 9 leaves). 9 rows proposed: 2 fully-modeled + 7 FAIL-LOUD, 0 fabrication. - 867 Confusion type-exemple: Example_Inference direct-conflict (first DirectRef use of this native token — prev. ExceptionRef only) - 875 Motte-and-bailey: VagueVerbalClassification_Inference direct-conflict (PR-10 polysemy reuse — equivocation modest/controversial thesis axis) - 868-874 (7 leaves: Idola fori, Reification, referential, magic-of-words, map/territory, use/mention, simulacre): FAIL-LOUD = 7th ontological gap, largest single gap cluster. Argumentative level-confusion family (sign/ref/abstract/concrete/model/reality category errors) with no native defeasible-reasoning scheme. Verbal-classification schemes model classification-via-term defects, NOT existence/reference claims — stretching them would violate #677. Reification_Inference/Reference/ UseMention flagged as hypothetical ontology-extension candidates. Completes the Equivoque sub-sub (21 rows: 11 modeled + 8 gaps + 2 recaps) — largest single block closed in the chantier. Surfaces the chantier's most impactful gap: 7 leaves > all 5 prior gaps combined. Refines gap typology (argumentative cluster-shaped gap, vs PR-11's singleton perceptual gap). Accounting: +2 strict, 111 cumulative (uniform-strict headline, po-2024 #716). Proposition only — GATED, 0 prod CSV/DB/OWL write. In-sub-sub scheme reuse, independent of I/RA/CA serialization decision. Co-Authored-By: Claude-Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
Twelfth cluster of the #498 AIF chantier. Third and final installment of the Equivoque sub-sub (Ambiguïté subfamily): the reification / magic-of-words / level-confusion mechanism (pk 867-875, 9 leaves) — the largest remaining Equivoque block.
Triggered by ai-01 dispatch
5ymo70(tertiary: continue clusters in autonomy). Basebdba45d8. Completes the Equivoque sub-sub (after PR-10 #717 polysemy, PR-11 #718 residual).Result
9 rows: 2 fully-modeled + 7 FAIL-LOUD, 0 fabrication. The reification block is the chantier's most gap-dense cluster (7/9 leaves).
Example_InferenceVagueVerbalClassification_InferenceThe 7-leaf level-confusion family = 7th ontological gap
All 7 leaves commit a semantic-ontological category error (language/reality, abstract/concrete, word/object, word-exists/referent-exists, model/reality, use/mention, real/idealized). The candidate native schemes (
VerbalClassification_Inferencefamily) model classification-via-term defects; reification is an existence/reference claim — stretching a classification scheme over it violates #677. The gap is argumentative (genuine fallacies, unlike PR-11's pre-argumentative mondegreen). AIF has no scheme for the "language-creates-reality" pattern.Reification_Inference/Reference_Inference/UseMention_Inferenceflagged as hypothetical ontology-extension candidates.Findings
Example_InferenceDirectRef use (867) — flagged for audit.Accounting — uniform-strict headline (po-2024 #716)
+2 strict this PR, 111 cumulative. 17 partial/gap tracked: 5 CA-missing (116 potential), 4 RA-missing (deferred), 8 FAIL-LOUD (861 perceptual + 868-874 reification).
Equivoque sub-sub COMPLETE (21 rows)
PR-10 (polysemy 5) + PR-11 (residual 4+1 gap) + PR-12 (reification 2+7 gaps) = 11 modeled + 8 gaps + 2 templates. Third fully-accounted subfamily-level block; largest single block closed.
Gate boundaries (HARD)
aif:assertion. No [runtime pending] feat(dnn): #649 RulesExplorer i18n — mirror loc() culture cascade #674/chore(dnn): #131 migrate 12 RazorComponent templates to Razor14 (source-level, runtime pending) #596/[HOLD post-tag] fix(cardpen): #629 convert relative /Cards paths to raw-master URLs (Option 1) #666/feat(mindmap): Virtues 8-lang parity — #665 code wiring + fr/en/ru/pt/es Batik SVGs (#636) #686 merge.Relates: #498, PR-1..PR-11, #707, #709 #716, #712, #677, #133/#130, #499, #458.
Generated with Claude Code