-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Align Tokenizer in JetStream #40
Conversation
JoeZijunZhou
commented
Apr 13, 2024
- Return token ids instead of custom decode operation result in JetStream; let client do tokenizer decode operation
- Update benchmark script and requester tool to use JetStream tokenizer seqio library for tokenizer decode operation
- Use correct method to let tokenizer decode the whole output token id list
- Update unit tests for the above change
- Enforce python type check to benchmark script
- Update README unit test section
// List of responses, one per sample. | ||
repeated string response = 1; | ||
// List of responses, one per sample. The list size depends on text generation strategy the engine used. | ||
repeated RepeatedTokenIds response = 1; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add your deleted field number to the reserved list, it may messes up deserialization. Here is the reference: https://protobuf.dev/programming-guides/dos-donts/#reserve-tag-numbers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not keep both and let the user choose whether she wants ids or string?
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ message DecodeRequest { | |||
int32 max_tokens = 4; | |||
} | |||
message DecodeResponse { | |||
// List of responses, one per sample. | |||
repeated string response = 1; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we still keep a str as option? The internal keep both text and token id.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess we don't want to decode it to str (or piece) in jetstream, since it would have some off in the final result.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great! Thanks for making the changes!
* Align Tokenizer in JetStream * Update requirements with pytest dep * Remove mix_decode unit test