Conversation
Signed-off-by: prxt6529 <prxt@6529.io>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds two CLI commands ( Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
actor User
participant CLI as 6529 CLI
participant Assert as assert-no-package-lock.cjs
participant SecurePnpm as run-secure-pnpm.cjs
participant Pnpm as pnpm
User->>CLI: run "6529 update" or "6529 update:all" [args]
CLI->>Assert: verify no package-lock.json
Assert-->>CLI: result (pass/fail)
CLI->>SecurePnpm: invoke secure runner with action (audit --fix or update + args)
SecurePnpm->>Pnpm: execute pnpm command
Pnpm-->>SecurePnpm: command result
SecurePnpm-->>CLI: exit status/output
CLI-->>User: final status/output
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 22 minutes and 20 seconds.Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 146-147: The phrase "`6529 add` and `6529 update` go through the
same Socket Firewall protected path as secure installs." uses an un-hyphenated
compound modifier; change "Socket Firewall protected path" to "Socket
Firewall-protected path" so the compound adjective is hyphenated
correctly—update the README sentence containing the backticked "`6529 add` and
`6529 update`" text to use "Socket Firewall-protected path."
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 4e7b11c5-4f82-4f3e-a248-9acf2b505f8c
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
README.mdbin/6529docs/developer/pnpm-and-socket-firewall.mdpackage.jsonpnpm-workspace.yaml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
__tests__/utils/appkit-initialization.utils.test.ts (1)
45-50: ⚡ Quick winAlso assert adapter creation args to lock platform wiring end-to-end.
Right now the tests verify final AppKit config, but not that
isCapacitorandchainsare forwarded intocreateAdapterWithCache. Adding that assertion makes regressions easier to catch.Suggested test additions
it("disables AppKit's default Coinbase connector on Capacitor", () => { initializeAppKit({ wallets: [], adapterManager: adapterManager as unknown as AppKitAdapterManager, isCapacitor: true, chains: [mainnet], }); + expect(adapterManager.createAdapterWithCache).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + [], + true, + [mainnet] + ); expect(createAppKit).toHaveBeenCalledWith( expect.objectContaining({ enableCoinbase: false, }) ); }); it("keeps AppKit's default Coinbase connector enabled outside Capacitor", () => { initializeAppKit({ wallets: [], adapterManager: adapterManager as unknown as AppKitAdapterManager, isCapacitor: false, chains: [mainnet], }); + expect(adapterManager.createAdapterWithCache).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + [], + false, + [mainnet] + ); expect(createAppKit).toHaveBeenCalledWith( expect.objectContaining({ enableCoinbase: true, }) ); });Also applies to: 60-65
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@__tests__/utils/appkit-initialization.utils.test.ts` around lines 45 - 50, The test should assert that initializeAppKit forwards platform and chain args into createAdapterWithCache: spy or mock the createAdapterWithCache call used by initializeAppKit and add expectations that it was invoked with an options object containing isCapacitor: true and chains: [mainnet] (and do the same for the other case around lines 60-65); locate the call site by referencing initializeAppKit and the createAdapterWithCache utility and add assertions to verify the adapter creation args include the expected isCapacitor and chains values to lock the end-to-end wiring.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@__tests__/utils/appkit-initialization.utils.test.ts`:
- Around line 45-50: The test should assert that initializeAppKit forwards
platform and chain args into createAdapterWithCache: spy or mock the
createAdapterWithCache call used by initializeAppKit and add expectations that
it was invoked with an options object containing isCapacitor: true and chains:
[mainnet] (and do the same for the other case around lines 60-65); locate the
call site by referencing initializeAppKit and the createAdapterWithCache utility
and add assertions to verify the adapter creation args include the expected
isCapacitor and chains values to lock the end-to-end wiring.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 5d6bbf32-b91a-46be-a474-94fb8422fda8
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
README.md__tests__/utils/appkit-initialization.utils.test.tsbin/6529docs/developer/pnpm-and-socket-firewall.mdpackage.jsonpnpm-workspace.yamlutils/appkit-initialization.utils.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- docs/developer/pnpm-and-socket-firewall.md
- README.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml
- package.json
Signed-off-by: prxt6529 <prxt@6529.io>
|
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores