wip

[simo6529]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Pinned versions for multiple transitive dependencies (framework internals, connector libraries, expansion utilities, linting helpers, and test tooling) to improve package consistency and stability across the workspace.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 4bce921b-af16-42a5-add4-26a0bb44a1b8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e5271e0 and f6c9e18.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• package.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes add pnpm dependency version overrides to package.json and pnpm-workspace.yaml, pinning transitive packages: @nestjs/core>path-to-regexp, multiple brace-expansion ranges, eslint-plugin-sonarjs>minimatch, ts-jest>handlebars, and subpath packages for @reown/appkit-adapter-wagmi.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)

Summary

Dependency Version Overrides package.json, pnpm-workspace.yaml

Added pnpm overrides entries to pin transitive dependency versions: @nestjs/core>path-to-regexp → 8.4.0; @reown/appkit-adapter-wagmi>@wagmi/connectors → 6.2.0, @reown/appkit-adapter-wagmi>@wagmi/core → 2.22.1; brace-expansion@1.1.12→1.1.13, brace-expansion@2.0.2→2.0.3, brace-expansion@5.0.4→5.0.5; eslint-plugin-sonarjs>minimatch → 10.2.4; ts-jest>handlebars → 4.7.9. Also minor formatting tweak to serialize-javascript entry in package.json (comma).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Suggested reviewers

• ragnep

Poem

🐇 I hopped through the lockfile bright,
Pinning versions snug and tight.
Brace and path-to-regexp align,
Handlebars and minimatch fine.
Builds now hum — a carrot-time delight!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'wip' is a vague, generic placeholder term that does not convey meaningful information about the changeset.	Replace 'wip' with a descriptive title that clearly summarizes the main change, such as 'Pin transitive dependencies in pnpm overrides' or similar.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch pnpm-integration-1

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e5271e0836

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud