-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
LG-11885: Expand mock proofer to support selfie capture #9882
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
night-jellyfish
merged 11 commits into
main
from
brittany/lg-11885-mock-proofer-to-accept-selfie
Jan 11, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f66f9f4
Add failing selfie yml file
96f4117
changelog: Internal, Doc Auth, Expand mock proofer to support selfie …
f48389d
Extract if method to separate method, clearer syntax
383e93e
Add tests for result_response, only return selfie results if selfie p…
45ad200
Camel case the TrueID mock response
995e558
Update app/services/doc_auth/mock/result_response.rb
7139664
Update app/services/doc_auth/mock/result_response.rb
8e01afc
lint fixes
2c00dff
Rm fixture files
59c86a6
Update test with success expectation
4debbee
Rm unnecessary setup
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems to me the best place to test that if we're not checking the selfie, we don't have the
portrait_match_resultskey, rather than building a whole new test for the negative condition. I thought making the opposite example of including the key above was then also warranted, and doing that changed the setup.