Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade propshaft from 0.7.0 to 0.8.0#9464

Closed
JJediny wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-fdb1467e537916685397317c995e8e7c
Closed

[Snyk] Security upgrade propshaft from 0.7.0 to 0.8.0#9464
JJediny wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-fdb1467e537916685397317c995e8e7c

Conversation

@JJediny
Copy link
Contributor

@JJediny JJediny commented Oct 26, 2023

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `rubygems` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • Gemfile
    • Gemfile.lock

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 616/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.9
Web Cache Poisoning
SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@aduth
Copy link
Contributor

aduth commented Oct 27, 2023

I'm just going to leave this open, since I think that'll stop Snyk from opening new pull requests.

Same as #9437, #9386, #9323, #9261, #9185, #9204, #7193.

This is being handled in #9359.

@aduth
Copy link
Contributor

aduth commented Dec 1, 2023

rack dependency upgrade handled in #9359

@aduth aduth closed this Dec 1, 2023
@aduth aduth deleted the snyk-fix-fdb1467e537916685397317c995e8e7c branch December 1, 2023 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants