Skip to content

LG-10780 Update the metrics in the identity verification report#9083

Merged
jmhooper merged 3 commits intomainfrom
jmhooper-change-the-identity-verified-background-job
Aug 24, 2023
Merged

LG-10780 Update the metrics in the identity verification report#9083
jmhooper merged 3 commits intomainfrom
jmhooper-change-the-identity-verified-background-job

Conversation

@jmhooper
Copy link
Contributor

This commit updates the identity verification report to include 3 groups of metrics:

  1. Metrics on starting the flow
  2. Metrics on completion of the in-line flow
  3. Metrics on verified users

These metrics are broken down further to cover specific scenarios we are concerned about.

This commit updates the identity verification report to include 3 groups of metrics:

1. Metrics on starting the flow
2. Metrics on completion of the in-line flow
3. Metrics on verified users

These metrics are broken down further to cover specific scenarios we are concerned about.

changelog: Internal, Reporter, The identity verification report was changed to remove a number of metrics and replace them with a number of metrics.
@jmhooper jmhooper requested review from a team and zachmargolis August 24, 2023 17:02
@jmhooper
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zachmargolis: I just added the Results module. PTAL

Copy link
Contributor

@zachmargolis zachmargolis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@@ -67,12 +84,15 @@
describe '#data' do
it 'counts unique users per event as a hash' do
expect(report.data).to eq(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in hindsight, maybe we could have had a separate hash for the derived numbers (results module) but in the end same same

@jmhooper jmhooper merged commit 02f79c6 into main Aug 24, 2023
@jmhooper jmhooper deleted the jmhooper-change-the-identity-verified-background-job branch August 24, 2023 19:46
@mdiarra3 mdiarra3 mentioned this pull request Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants