Skip to content

Update review application configuration to behave closer to development environment#8671

Merged
mitchellhenke merged 2 commits intomainfrom
mitchellhenke/update-review-app-config
Jun 28, 2023
Merged

Update review application configuration to behave closer to development environment#8671
mitchellhenke merged 2 commits intomainfrom
mitchellhenke/update-review-app-config

Conversation

@mitchellhenke
Copy link
Contributor

🛠 Summary of changes

Following today's appdev/devops sync, this brings a few changes to make review apps to be a bit more useful for reviewing changes by making identity proofing possible. It also changes the logs to go to STDOUT (related to #8610)

@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke force-pushed the mitchellhenke/update-review-app-config branch from 7547531 to 101a186 Compare June 27, 2023 20:22
Copy link
Contributor

@timothy-spencer timothy-spencer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If that works for you, it works for me. :-)

@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke force-pushed the mitchellhenke/update-review-app-config branch 2 times, most recently from 2dc9c0c to 94b9ed3 Compare June 28, 2023 14:28
@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke force-pushed the mitchellhenke/update-review-app-config branch 2 times, most recently from 52d9e1d to 63e2cb0 Compare June 28, 2023 17:52
Mitchell Henke added 2 commits June 28, 2023 13:01
…ot require an SP to proof, and log to STDOUT

changelog: Internal, Continuous Integration, Update review application configuration to do synchronous proofing, not require an SP to proof, and log to STDOUT
@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke force-pushed the mitchellhenke/update-review-app-config branch from 63e2cb0 to 5c60bc6 Compare June 28, 2023 18:01
@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke merged commit c2a97db into main Jun 28, 2023
@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke deleted the mitchellhenke/update-review-app-config branch June 28, 2023 18:26
@mdiarra3 mdiarra3 mentioned this pull request Jun 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants