-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
Use non-hashed SSN param, removed hashed version #6854
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ | |
| "policy": "test-policy", | ||
| "service_type": "all", | ||
| "session_id": "UNIQUE_SESSION_ID", | ||
| "ssn_hash": "15e2b0d3c33891ebb0f1ef609ec419420c20e320ce94c65fbc8c3312448eb225", | ||
| "national_id_number": "123456789", | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. (not a blocker) do you think this would be easier to keep in sync if we removed it as a fixture file and inlined it in the spec?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I guess a little, because it's moderately easier to determine what specs to run if the data is right in the relevant spec. But I don't think I want to change it now. |
||
| "national_id_type": "US_SSN", | ||
| "input_ip_address": "127.0.0.1", | ||
| "local_attrib_1": "ABCD" | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,18 +1,9 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "account_address_result": "success", | ||
| "account_address_score": "0", | ||
| "account_email_result": "success", | ||
| "account_email_score": "0", | ||
| "account_name_result": "success", | ||
| "account_name_score": "0", | ||
| "account_telephone_result": "success", | ||
| "account_telephone_score": "0", | ||
| "request_id": "1234", | ||
| "request_result": "success", | ||
| "review_status": "pass", | ||
| "risk_rating": "trusted", | ||
| "ssn_hash_result": "success", | ||
| "ssn_hash_score": "0", | ||
| "summary_risk_score": "-6", | ||
| "tmx_risk_rating": "neutral" | ||
| "tmx_risk_rating": "neutral", | ||
| "fraudpoint.score": "500" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good. not a blocker but we might want to update the sample response here which has ssn_hash_result : spec/fixtures/proofing/lexis_nexis/ddp/successful_response.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
made some updates to it!