Skip to content

Add Pinpoint Check to GitLab CI#6614

Merged
mitchellhenke merged 1 commit intomainfrom
mitchellhenke/gitlab-pinpoint-check
Aug 1, 2022
Merged

Add Pinpoint Check to GitLab CI#6614
mitchellhenke merged 1 commit intomainfrom
mitchellhenke/gitlab-pinpoint-check

Conversation

@mitchellhenke
Copy link
Contributor

May switch this to running on main or a daily job that sends an email, etc. but just trying to establish basic functionality first 🙂

Copy link
Contributor

@zachmargolis zachmargolis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

/usr/local/lib/ruby/3.0.0/net/http/response.rb:124:in `error!': 403 "Forbidden" (Faraday::ConnectionFailed)

Looks like our proxy prevented the script from working?

@mitchellhenke
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM!

/usr/local/lib/ruby/3.0.0/net/http/response.rb:124:in `error!': 403 "Forbidden" (Faraday::ConnectionFailed)

Looks like our proxy prevented the script from working?

Yep, will get some changes in over there.

@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke force-pushed the mitchellhenke/gitlab-pinpoint-check branch from 83f6b4d to 8224704 Compare August 1, 2022 15:52
changelog: Internal, Continuous Integration, Add Pinpoint Check to GitLab CI
@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke force-pushed the mitchellhenke/gitlab-pinpoint-check branch from 8224704 to ba904f2 Compare August 1, 2022 16:17
@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2022 16:55
@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke merged commit 389b186 into main Aug 1, 2022
@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke deleted the mitchellhenke/gitlab-pinpoint-check branch August 1, 2022 17:13
@mitchellhenke mitchellhenke mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2022
@solipet solipet mentioned this pull request Aug 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants