Skip to content

Try limiting IdV cancellation shared examples to single SP#6404

Merged
aduth merged 2 commits intomainfrom
aduth-rm-cancel-at-per-sp
May 25, 2022
Merged

Try limiting IdV cancellation shared examples to single SP#6404
aduth merged 2 commits intomainfrom
aduth-rm-cancel-at-per-sp

Conversation

@aduth
Copy link
Contributor

@aduth aduth commented May 24, 2022

Why: To reduce build time, and since the shared behavior isn't really particular about the specific SP, just that there may be different behavior by the mere presence of some SP (see source).

Copy link
Contributor

@zachmargolis zachmargolis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we do have rare OIDC/SAML mismatch bugs but you're right, this is probably not going to highlight very many

@aduth
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduth commented May 24, 2022

I think we do have rare OIDC/SAML mismatch bugs but you're right, this is probably not going to highlight very many

Yeah, I did check some of the other OIDC + SAML branching tests, and came to a similar conclusion that we might not want to apply this sort of change broadly, but for this particular set of shared examples, it is most concerned with the presence/absence of an SP, and doesn't assert anything about the specific SP.

aduth added 2 commits May 24, 2022 13:29
**Why**: To reduce build time, and since the shared behavior isn't really particular about the specific SP, just that there may be different behavior by the mere presence of some SP.
changelog: Internal, Automated Testing, Reduce build time for automated tests
@aduth aduth force-pushed the aduth-rm-cancel-at-per-sp branch from 0944347 to e0d48b4 Compare May 24, 2022 17:29
@aduth aduth merged commit e8437cc into main May 25, 2022
@aduth aduth deleted the aduth-rm-cancel-at-per-sp branch May 25, 2022 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants