Replace custom color variables with design system tokens#6086
Conversation
nickttng
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM.
Slightly off-topic: About the warning lists here, have there been any discussions about aligning these bullet points with the LGDS?
Yeah, I think we've been generally moving away from them. I'd be happy to do it sooner than later, maybe even as part of this pull request. For context, it would be these two lists: |
anniehirshman-gsa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM and I'm all for standardizing the bullet styles on those two pages as well!
|
👍 I removed all the color list variations in df2bd9d.
|
|
LGTM! Thanks for confirming with the screenshots. |
|
Spotted another, with IAL1 account creation cancellation, updated in 38b76e2:
|
LGTM also! |
**Why**: So that we have a single source of truth for colors, to improve consistency and reduce confusion. changelog: Improvements, Layout, Use design system tooling for page layouts
**Why**: For consistency with design system










Why: So that we have a single source of truth for colors, to improve consistency and reduce confusion.
Largely, there should not be any meaningful differences from this change. However, to the above point about consistency, there are a few minor differences between our ad hoc colors and the design system:
#e1ce28($yellow)#f5d600(warning)IAL2 cancellation warning listEdit: Removed#00bfe7($teal)#00a2c4(info)IAL2 forgot password warning listEdit: Removed#5b616a($gray)#454545(ink)Reference: https://design.login.gov/utilities/color/
This retains existing styling for email templates, but those should ideally be updated to use design system tokens as well.