Conversation
0a857e6 to
96ac446
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
these two additions and the document_capture_step_helper.rb addition seeme to make these tests run better (although not perfectly) locally -- am happy to remove though if it's adding to the noise of this larger PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i wonder if there is a more holistically way to solve this issue :(
mitchellhenke
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One small removal suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| page.has_content? t('forms.buttons.back') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i added it because i was confused about why the tracker was receiving idv_rate_limited twice, based on the name of the test. i thought it might be helpful for other people like myself, but happy to remove it if you think it's not adding value. (very few folks have to dive into the tests of other teams in the way i'm doing it right now, after all)
6b7b7f9 to
afc6e7b
Compare
🎫 Ticket
Link to the relevant ticket:
163
🛠 Summary of changes
Adding a general rate limiter event. Opening draft PR to run tests (feature specs seem to be broken locally)