Remove controller-level "bypass" check for SP MFA requirement#11375
Merged
Remove controller-level "bypass" check for SP MFA requirement#11375
Conversation
changelog: Internal, Code Quality, Consolidate phishing-resistant MFA checks to protocol controllers
mitchellhenke
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🎫 Ticket
Supports LG-14455
🛠 Summary of changes
Removes a
before_actioncheck from MFA controllers to ensure that a user is only allowed to MFA with a phishing-resistant MFA or PIV/CAC if required by the partner.These are not effective bypass checks, and are already considered as part of
confirm_two_factor_authenticatedfor final authentication checks of OIDC and SAML. Since weaker MFA options are excluded from the options listing when phishing-resistant or PIV/CAC is required from a partner, the only way a user would be able to visit these pages is by manually crafting the URL. If they were to do this (see "Testing Plan"), they'd still be redirected back to authenticate with a phishing-resistant method or PIV/CAC after authenticating with the other method.📜 Testing Plan
Verify no regressions of LG-3209 and LG-3185.
Verify that build passes, and notably there are specs with effective bypass attempt checking that still pass.
Attempt to bypass partner requirements, and verify that you are unable:
Prerequisite: Have an account with a phishing-resistant method (ideally PIV/CAC) and at least one phishable method (e.g. phone).