-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
LG-13006: remove instances of skip_doc_auth #11043
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
6642178
239d4e4
61d3922
f3687df
6d93f89
b4a170b
f057ec7
3c6c3bf
f8e68ea
9080c78
8fab239
a505c21
8b48ac6
7145ef8
abc03be
557be83
2b79108
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -48,9 +48,11 @@ def self.selected_remote(idv_session:) | |
| if IdentityConfig.store.in_person_proofing_opt_in_enabled && | ||
| IdentityConfig.store.in_person_proofing_enabled && | ||
| idv_session.service_provider&.in_person_proofing_enabled | ||
| idv_session.skip_doc_auth == false | ||
| idv_session.skip_doc_auth_from_how_to_verify == false || | ||
| idv_session.skip_doc_auth == false | ||
| else | ||
| idv_session.skip_doc_auth.nil? || | ||
| idv_session.skip_doc_auth_from_how_to_verify.nil? || | ||
| idv_session.skip_doc_auth_from_how_to_verify == false || idv_session.skip_doc_auth.nil? || | ||
|
||
| idv_session.skip_doc_auth == false | ||
shanechesnutt-ft marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| end | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@KeithNava
(I’m starting this general conversation on a specific file so that replies are threaded.)
When I look at the “Progress” section of the ticket LG-13006, I see checkbox 4
After the “wait for deploy” line, I see checkbox 5
Based on the "Summary of changes" in the PR description, I think this PR is meant to take care of checkbox 5, correct? I don’t see that Micah N’s PR #10690, which I believe took care of checkbox 4, was ever merged. Are you planning on merging that PR before this one? Does it need a review?
Let me know, thanks! I haven’t yet had a chance to review this PR, but I wanted to ask this question upfront because I know sequencing gets tricky for PRs that are affected by 50-50 state.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@eileen-nava Thanks. I actually noticed that the logic in PR #10690 was updated via this commit da81567#diff-ffdec6293037a40f4daee9914c58a356de09f502e897c0e73ea4f02c76787c02 so I don't think we would need Micah's PR anymore. I'm tagging @n1zyy to help confirm though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@KeithNava I have to plead some level of ignorance here. 😇
I wasn't intentionally changing anything relating to
skip_doc_authin that PR; I just removed it as appearing to be unused. This comment paints some context for the change—we were passing that value into the constructor but didn't seem to ever be using its value in theshowmethod, so I removed it as dead code. (TBH I don't completely remember why I thought it was unused, but it seems like people agreed with me. I've lost some of this context to time.)I didn't have Micah's PR in mind when I worked on this. It looks like his change to this file would be unnecessary, but he did also update the HybridHandoffController which I didn't touch, so that likely still needs attention.