Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i'm wondering why we are using this sp1_issuer, rather than the issuer of the service_provider created here, but i haven't looked into that yet
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this can be called just once, and we can update any changing values in the context blocks
…rstanding around responses
| expect(get_asserted_attribute(user, :email)).to eq expected_email | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| it 'gets UUID (MBUN) from Service Provider' do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see that MBUN is referenced elsewhere, but what does it mean?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I looked it up. I think it is Meaningless But Unique Number. I think that it is confusing and should be removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Interesting, thanks. I think I'd disagree that it's meaningless too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
early SAML docs used it more, we document it in the glossary
5 participants
WIP Currently just open so folks can look at the changes made in the attributes_asserter_spec file
🎫 Ticket
As part of https://gitlab.login.gov/lg-people/lg-people-appdev/Melba/backlog-fy24/-/issues/55, we discovered a number of issues with our returned AAL values. I wanted to write some tests to make sure our understanding of the current state vs the expected state was accurate.
This first commit is just a refactor of the spec file in order to make it easier to understand and work with,