Closed
Conversation
added 30 commits
January 30, 2024 17:02
…t a pending ipp enrollment exists for please call
…se call page when flagged for fraud review
…se call page when flagged for fraud review
…5-threatmetrix-please-call-ipp-screen Merging in main.
…5-threatmetrix-please-call-ipp-screen Pull in main to fix pinpoint check and js errors.
…0 50 state and adding spec
…le_pending_fraud_review on users with ipp enrollments
…l case respects feature flag
…ly when not in ipp
added 6 commits
February 12, 2024 14:34
…5-threatmetrix-please-call-ipp-screen Merging in main to get pinpoint checks to pass.
…o jryan/lg-12172-tmx-rejection-screen Merging in work from LG-11995 to have access to fraud review changes and new user method.
… has been reviewed or rejected
…t when user has passed ipp
Contributor
Author
|
Closing in favor of #10119 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🎫 Ticket
Link to the relevant ticket:
LG-12172
🛠 Summary of changes
This simplifies and extends the logic used to implement LG-119955. The reason I could simplify is that we're targeting both reject and review methods instead of just one. So there's no need to isolate as much code.
📜 Testing Plan
Test with a failed enrollment: