-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
enabling zeroize for field elements
#24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ extern crate ff_derive; | |
| #[cfg(feature = "derive")] | ||
| pub use ff_derive::*; | ||
|
|
||
| #[macro_use] | ||
| extern crate zeroize; | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This could then be removed. |
||
|
|
||
| use rand_core::RngCore; | ||
| use std::error::Error; | ||
| use std::fmt; | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm still not sure that we want to have a required dependency on
zeroizefor theffcrate, especially asZeroizeis not part of any bound on theFieldorPrimeFieldtraits. I think I would prefer that we make this crate optional, and instead of usingzeroize_derivewe manually add animpl Zeroize for #reprif thezeroizefeature is enabled.This would require adding a
zeroizefeature flag toff_derive, and then here:(Crates that use
namespaced-featurescan't be published, so we can't have a feature with the same name as a crate.)cc @tarcieri.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We make
zeroizeoptional in most of the RustCrypto crates, FWIW.I think it may be possible to avoid adding a
zeroizefeature toff_derive, but I'd have to double check what I have in mind: amely there's already azeroize_derivecrate, so it might be possible to use that rather than modifyingff_deriveto have custom zeroize support?