Frontend update model type #49
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes primarily focused on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/lib/types/Model/Model.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-36: Summary of changes and next steps
- The Model type has been updated with a new 'join' property, but there's a discrepancy between the AI summary and the visible changes regarding removed properties ('id', 'createTime', 'lastUpdated').
- There are TODO comments in both the Model and JoinTimeSeriesResponse types that need to be addressed.
Next steps:
- Verify and resolve the discrepancy regarding removed properties from the Model type.
- Update components using the Model type to handle the new 'join' property.
- Finalize the JoinTimeSeriesResponse type and remove TODO comments.
- Consider renaming properties in JoinTimeSeriesResponse for clarity.
- Update documentation to reflect these changes.
Given the changes to the Model type and the addition of the JoinTimeSeriesResponse, consider reviewing the overall data flow and architecture of your application. Ensure that these changes align with your application's design principles and don't introduce unnecessary complexity.
frontend/src/lib/types/Model/Model.test.ts (2)
33-33: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of 'join' to the expectedModelKeys array correctly reflects the changes made to the Model type. This update aligns with the PR objectives of keeping the frontend in sync with backend changes.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the 'join' property for better code documentation:
const expectedModelKeys: (keyof Model)[] = [ 'name', 'online', 'production', 'team', 'modelType', + // 'join' property added to reflect backend changes 'join' ];
Line range hint
1-190: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectives, but consistency needs improvementThe changes in this file appropriately update the expected keys for the Model type, aligning with the PR objectives of keeping the frontend in sync with backend changes. However, there's an inconsistency in the implementation of these changes between different tests.
Key points:
- The 'join' property was correctly added to the expectedModelKeys in the first test.
- The 'id', 'createTime', and 'lastUpdated' properties were correctly removed from both tests.
- The 'join' property is missing from the expectedModelKeys in the search results test.
To ensure robust testing and maintain consistency, please address the inconsistency in the search results test as mentioned in the previous comment.
Consider implementing a shared constant or type for the expected Model keys to ensure consistency across all tests and reduce the likelihood of such discrepancies in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- frontend/src/lib/components/NavigationBar/NavigationBar.svelte (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/types/Model/Model.test.ts (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/types/Model/Model.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/routes/models/+page.svelte (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
frontend/src/lib/types/Model/Model.ts (3)
Line range hint
28-36: Address TODO comments for property renaming in JoinTimeSeriesResponse.The TODO comments suggest renaming some properties in the JoinTimeSeriesResponse type for clarity:
- Consider renaming 'name' to 'joinName' in the root of the type.
- Consider renaming 'name' to 'groupByName' in the 'items' array.
Implementing these renames could improve code readability and make the purpose of each property clearer. Ensure to update all usages of this type across the codebase if you proceed with the renaming.
To find all occurrences of JoinTimeSeriesResponse usage, run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of JoinTimeSeriesResponse usage rg --type typescript "JoinTimeSeriesResponse" -g '!**/Model.ts'
7-7: Verify the impact of adding the 'join' property and address the TODO comment.The addition of the 'join' property to the Model type introduces a new data structure. However, the TODO comment suggests that this is part of ongoing work.
- Ensure that all components using the Model type are updated to handle this new property.
- Update the type definition for JoinTimeSeriesResponse once the related work is completed.
- Remove the TODO comment once the type is finalized.
To check the usage of the Model type across the codebase, run:
Consider adding a more descriptive comment about the purpose of the 'join' property and its relationship to the Model type.
✅ Verification successful
The addition of the 'join' property has been verified and does not impact other parts of the codebase.
- Ensure that the TODO comment is addressed once the JoinTimeSeriesResponse type updates are complete.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of the Model type usage rg --type typescript "Model(\s*[{]|\[)" -g '!**/Model.ts'Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of the Model type usage in TypeScript files rg "Model(\s*[{\[])" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'Length of output: 98
1-7:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the removal of 'id', 'createTime', and 'lastUpdated' properties.
The AI summary mentions the removal of 'id', 'createTime', and 'lastUpdated' properties from the Model type, but these changes are not visible in the provided code snippet. This discrepancy needs to be addressed.
To confirm these changes and their impact, run:
If these properties have indeed been removed:
- Update all components that may have been using these properties.
- Consider the implications on model identification and tracking over time.
- Update any documentation or comments referencing these properties.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of 'id', 'createTime', and 'lastUpdated' Properties Verified.
All specified properties have been successfully removed from the
Modeltype infrontend/src/lib/types/Model/Model.ts, and no residual usages were found in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of potentially removed properties echo "Checking for 'id' usage:" rg --type typescript "model\.id" -g '!**/Model.ts' echo "Checking for 'createTime' usage:" rg --type typescript "model\.createTime" -g '!**/Model.ts' echo "Checking for 'lastUpdated' usage:" rg --type typescript "model\.lastUpdated" -g '!**/Model.ts'Length of output: 560
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of potentially removed properties excluding Model.ts echo "Checking for 'id' usage:" rg "model\.id" -g '!**/Model.ts' echo "Checking for 'createTime' usage:" rg "model\.createTime" -g '!**/Model.ts' echo "Checking for 'lastUpdated' usage:" rg "model\.lastUpdated" -g '!**/Model.ts'Length of output: 350
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify removal of 'id', 'createTime', and 'lastUpdated' from Model.ts echo "Verifying removal of 'id' property in Model.ts:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export type Model = {\n $$$\n id: $_,\n $$$\n}' echo "Verifying removal of 'createTime' property in Model.ts:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export type Model = {\n $$$\n createTime: $_,\n $$$\n}' echo "Verifying removal of 'lastUpdated' property in Model.ts:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export type Model = {\n $$$\n lastUpdated: $_,\n $$$\n}'Length of output: 644
frontend/src/routes/models/+page.svelte (2)
Line range hint
1-54: Consider additional improvements for better user experience and scalability.While the primary change has been implemented correctly, here are some suggestions to enhance the component:
- Reconsider the removal of the "Last Updated" column. If this information is valuable to users, consider keeping it or providing an alternative way to access this data.
- Add sorting functionality to the table columns. This would allow users to easily find the models they're looking for.
- Implement pagination or virtualization if the number of models is expected to grow large.
- Add a search or filter functionality to help users quickly find specific models.
Here's a basic example of how you might add sorting functionality:
<script lang="ts"> import { sortBy } from 'lodash-es'; // ... existing imports ... const { data } = $props(); let models: Model[] = $state(data.models.items); let sortColumn = $state('name'); let sortDirection = $state('asc'); $effect(() => { models = sortBy(data.models.items, [sortColumn]); if (sortDirection === 'desc') { models.reverse(); } }); function toggleSort(column: string) { if (column === sortColumn) { sortDirection = sortDirection === 'asc' ? 'desc' : 'asc'; } else { sortColumn = column; sortDirection = 'asc'; } } </script> <Table> <!-- ... --> <TableHeader> <TableRow> <TableHead on:click={() => toggleSort('name')}>Name {sortColumn === 'name' ? (sortDirection === 'asc' ? '▲' : '▼') : ''}</TableHead> <TableHead on:click={() => toggleSort('team')}>Team {sortColumn === 'team' ? (sortDirection === 'asc' ? '▲' : '▼') : ''}</TableHead> <!-- ... other headers ... --> </TableRow> </TableHeader> <!-- ... --> </Table>This example adds basic sorting functionality. You may need to adjust it based on your specific needs and design requirements.
As the application grows, consider implementing more advanced state management solutions like stores for handling sorting, pagination, and filtering across multiple components.
Let's check if there are any existing sorting or pagination utilities in the project:
#!/bin/bash # Search for existing sorting or pagination utilities rg --type typescript --type svelte 'sort|paginate|pagination'
32-34: Update to model link is correct, but consider additional improvements.The change from
model.idtomodel.namein the href attribute aligns with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. This update ensures compatibility with the backend changes where theidproperty was removed from theModeltype.However, there are a few points to consider:
- Ensure that
model.nameis unique and URL-safe. If not, consider encoding it or using a different unique identifier.- Update any corresponding route handlers to expect
nameinstead ofid.- Consider adding a title attribute to the anchor tag for better accessibility.
Consider applying the following improvements:
- <a href="/models/{model.name}/observability" class="hover:underline"> + <a href="/models/{encodeURIComponent(model.name)}/observability" class="hover:underline" title="View observability for {model.name}"> {model.name} </a>To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check for other occurrences of model routing:
✅ Verification successful
All instances of model routing have been verified and updated correctly using
model.name.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of model routing in the frontend rg --type svelte --type typescript '/models/.+/observability'Length of output: 192
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of model routing in the frontend rg --type svelte --type typescript '/models/.+/observability'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of model routing in the frontend rg '/models/.+/observability' --glob '*.svelte' --glob '*.ts'Length of output: 288
frontend/src/lib/components/NavigationBar/NavigationBar.svelte (1)
119-119: Approved change, but consider potential implicationsThe change from
model.idtomodel.namein the URL path aligns with the PR objectives to update the frontend based on backend changes. However, please consider the following points:
- Ensure that model names are unique to avoid routing conflicts.
- Verify that model names with special characters are properly URL-encoded.
- Check for consistency across the application, ensuring all references to model routing use
model.nameinstead ofmodel.id.To verify the consistency of this change across the application, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in model routing across the application and check if URL encoding is being used for model names.
## Summary Quick follow up to #44 since the Model.ts type changed on the backend ## Checklist - [ ] Added Unit Tests - [x] Covered by existing CI - [ ] Integration tested - [ ] Documentation update <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Updated navigation links to use model names instead of IDs for improved clarity. - Removed the "Last Updated" column from the models table for a cleaner display. - **Bug Fixes** - Adjusted the model type structure to reflect the removal of outdated properties and the addition of a new property. - **Tests** - Updated test cases to align with the revised model structure, removing outdated keys and adding new ones. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Piyush Narang <[email protected]>
Summary
Quick follow up to #44 since the Model.ts type changed on the backend
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests