Skip to content

Conversation

@tchow-zlai
Copy link
Collaborator

@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai commented Jan 28, 2025

Summary

  • Starting this immediately might cause this check to race with the other CI actions - it might just succeed before the other workflows have a chance to start.

Checklist

  • Added Unit Tests
  • Covered by existing CI
  • Integration tested
  • Documentation update

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub workflow configuration to add a 10-second delay before processing status checks.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file by adding a 10-second delay parameter to the poseidon/[email protected] action in the enforce_triggered_workflows job. This change introduces a brief waiting period before proceeding with status checks, potentially allowing for more robust workflow execution timing.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/require_triggered_status_checks.yaml Added delay: "10s" parameter to the status checks step

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • nikhil-zlai
  • varant-zlai
  • ken-zlai
  • piyush-zlai
  • david-zlai
  • kumar-zlai
  • sean-zlai
  • chewy-zlai

Poem

Workflows dance, a ten-second pause 🕰️
Checks await, with GitHub's applause 🚀
Patience woven in code's embrace
A moment's breath, a gentle grace
CI/CD's rhythmic flow 🌊

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

GitHub Actions: Resource not accessible by integration - https://docs.github.com/rest/actions/workflow-runs#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository.

Please grant the required permissions to the CodeRabbit GitHub App under the organization or repository settings.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c5d6aa and c9e5af8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/require_triggered_status_checks.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/require_triggered_status_checks.yaml (2)

13-14: LGTM! 10s delay is reasonable.

Adding a delay helps avoid race conditions.


13-14: Verify action version supports delay parameter.

✅ Verification successful

Delay parameter is supported by action version v0.6.0

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the action version supports delay parameter
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/poseidon/wait-for-status-checks/v0.6.0/action.yml | grep -A 2 "delay:"

Length of output: 222


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

with:
token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
delay: "10s"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we do higher like 1m?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd prefer to leave it at 10s which feels high enough, sometimes the scala fmt test will fail pretty quickly and Id want the feedback there.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll increase it if we see more weird behavior.

@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai merged commit 16c05a8 into main Jan 29, 2025
4 checks passed
@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai deleted the tchow/status-check-delay branch January 29, 2025 18:15
nikhil-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
## Summary
- Starting this immediately might cause this check to race with the
other CI actions - it might just succeed before the other workflows have
a chance to start.
## Checklist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update


<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to track
the status of stacks when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Chores**
- Updated GitHub workflow configuration to add a 10-second delay before
processing status checks.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
kumar-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
## Summary
- Starting this immediately might cause this check to race with the
other CI actions - it might just succeed before the other workflows have
a chance to start.
## Checklist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update


<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to track
the status of stacks when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Chores**
- Updated GitHub workflow configuration to add a 10-second delay before
processing status checks.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants