Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌫️✨ Journal: Discovering Entries #6

Open
Tracked by #1 ...
zspencer opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #1 ...

🌫️✨ Journal: Discovering Entries #6

zspencer opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
✨ feature Reduces Client's Burden or Grants them Benefits 🌫️ foggy Stuff we're not quite sure how to move forward with

Comments

@zspencer
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@zspencer zspencer changed the title Discovering Entries Journal: Discovering Entries Jan 29, 2024
@zspencer zspencer mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2024
3 tasks
zspencer added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2024
- #6

What I'm driving towards here is similar to
zinc-collective#2055, where a
`Journal::Entry` has an affordance for being opinionated about how it's
represented when linked to in search engines or peer-to-peer sharing; as
well as short text for when there are a several on `Journal#show`.
zspencer added a commit to zinc-collective/convene that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2024
- zinc-collective#2
- zinc-collective#6
- zinc-collective#4

Clearly, when I started
zinc-collective#8 I used the
wrong name. It's not an `Entry#description`, it's an `Entry#summary`!

Perhaps that would have been more obvious had I started with the spec,
rather than the data model. Ah well, inside out and outside in are both
valid.
@zspencer zspencer changed the title Journal: Discovering Entries 🌫️✨ Journal: Discovering Entries Jan 29, 2024
@zspencer zspencer added ✨ feature Reduces Client's Burden or Grants them Benefits 🌫️ foggy Stuff we're not quite sure how to move forward with labels Jan 29, 2024
zspencer added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2024
- #2
- #6
- #4

Clearly, when I started
#8 I used the
wrong name. It's not an `Entry#description`, it's an `Entry#summary`!

Perhaps that would have been more obvious had I started with the spec,
rather than the data model. Ah well, inside out and outside in are both
valid.
zspencer added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2024
- #2
- #6
- #4

Clearly, when I started
#8 I used the
wrong name. It's not an `Entry#description`, it's an `Entry#summary`!

Perhaps that would have been more obvious had I started with the spec,
rather than the data model. Ah well, inside out and outside in are both
valid.
zspencer added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2024
- #2
- #6
- #4

Clearly, when I started
#8 I used the
wrong name. It's not an `Entry#description`, it's an `Entry#summary`!

Perhaps that would have been more obvious had I started with the spec,
rather than the data model. Ah well, inside out and outside in are both
valid.
zspencer added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2024
- #2
- #6
- #4

Clearly, when I started
#8 I used the
wrong name. It's not an `Entry#description`, it's an `Entry#summary`!

Perhaps that would have been more obvious had I started with the spec,
rather than the data model. Ah well, inside out and outside in are both
valid.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
✨ feature Reduces Client's Burden or Grants them Benefits 🌫️ foggy Stuff we're not quite sure how to move forward with
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant