usb: udc: dwc2: split vendor quirks per-vendor#105030
usb: udc: dwc2: split vendor quirks per-vendor#105030kartben merged 1 commit intozephyrproject-rtos:mainfrom
Conversation
0a657f4 to
50bf381
Compare
|
Force-push:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The commit message says it updates platforms ESP32, NRF and STM32 but only the former two are added.
Either update the commit message or add missing platform.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch done as STM32 already had rules that match the extra quirks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ST is not related to this quirk in any way.
50bf381 to
950bfe3
Compare
|
This needs to be rebased on top of this: |
While it needs to be rebased on top of main to solve conflicts, I don't think there is a need for this to wait for a PR that was opened later than this one, and is still not ready. |
950bfe3 to
05eadfc
Compare
|
I did just re-split from |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ST is not related to this quirk in any way.
|
This should go in right after #103779. |
05eadfc to
c20db91
Compare
|
DNM until things are fixed, rebased on top of latest |
c20db91 to
65c9a1e
Compare
65c9a1e to
e69a359
Compare
Use one file per vendor quirk. No modification to any content, only the same code being moved to separate files. Signed-off-by: Josuah Demangeon <josuah.demangeon@nordicsemi.no>
e69a359 to
5ed6981
Compare
|



Mergeudc_dwc2.hintoudc_dwc2.c.Split
udc_dwc2_vendor_quirks.hin one file per platform.AddMAINTAINERS.ymlrules.DT_INST_FOREACH_STATUS_OKAY(...)-struct udc_dwc2_configis back intoudc_dwc2.cIs it worth the change? Textual move, no modification of the content.