Skip to content

Conversation

@stanislaw
Copy link
Collaborator

As of the version 0.9.1, StrictDoc has switched to a new syntax for defining SECTIONs. From now on, all sections must be defined as

[[SECTION]] instead of [SECTION].

The rationale for the migration is explained in the related GitHub ticket:

Migration: SDoc model: Merge Section, Node, Composite Node into just Node #2193

IMPORTANT: When this PR is reviewed and merged, all existing PRs should be updated to only have [[SECTION]] tags instead of [SECTION].

See also the migration guide for further reference:

https://strictdoc.readthedocs.io/en/stable/stable/docs/strictdoc_01_user_guide.html#SECTION-UG-NODE-MIGRATION

StrictDoc 0.9.1 version is needed for this changeset to work.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Pankevich [email protected]

As of the version 0.9.1, StrictDoc has switched to a new syntax for
defining SECTIONs. From now on, all sections must be defined as

`[[SECTION]]` instead of `[SECTION]`.

The rationale for the migration is explained in the related GitHub
ticket:

[Migration: SDoc model: Merge Section, Node, Composite Node into just
Node #2193](strictdoc-project/strictdoc#2193)

**IMPORTANT:** When this PR is reviewed and merged, all existing PRs
should be updated to only have [[SECTION]] tags instead of [SECTION].

See also the migration guide for further reference:

https://strictdoc.readthedocs.io/en/stable/stable/docs/strictdoc_01_user_guide.html#SECTION-UG-NODE-MIGRATION

**StrictDoc 0.9.1 version is needed for this changeset to work.**

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Pankevich [email protected]
@stanislaw stanislaw force-pushed the stanislaw/composite_section_migration branch from 687a17e to d837025 Compare June 24, 2025 15:41
@stanislaw stanislaw requested a review from parphane June 24, 2025 15:43
@tobiaskaestner tobiaskaestner self-assigned this Jul 28, 2025
@tobiaskaestner
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@parphane parphane mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
@parphane parphane requested review from tobiaskaestner and removed request for parphane July 29, 2025 14:14
Copy link
Contributor

@tobiaskaestner tobiaskaestner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good to me

Copy link
Contributor

@tobiaskaestner tobiaskaestner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tobiaskaestner tobiaskaestner merged commit 08b2468 into zephyrproject-rtos:main Jul 29, 2025
2 checks passed
@stanislaw stanislaw deleted the stanislaw/composite_section_migration branch July 29, 2025 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants