Skip to content

Conversation

@ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Jan 16, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a new publishing script for canary releases, enabling the distribution of pre-release versions to testing and early-access users.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 16, 2026 13:17
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Added a new publish-canary npm script to package.json that executes pnpm publish across all packages with a canary tag and the --no-git-checks flag.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
npm scripts configuration
package.json
Added publish-canary script to enable canary package publishing with --no-git-checks flag

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A canary script hops in with glee,
Publishing packages wild and free,
No git checks to block the spree,
Version tags fly, hop-hop-hooray! 🚀



📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 233b47d and 482acf0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json

✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job


PR Review Complete ✅

I've reviewed the addition of the publish-canary command to the package.json scripts section. Here's my comprehensive analysis:

Todo List

  • Read the package.json changes
  • Analyze code quality and best practices
  • Check for potential bugs or issues
  • Review performance considerations
  • Examine security concerns
  • Assess test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Feedback

Code Quality & Best Practices

The new script follows the existing patterns in the project:

  • Consistent with other publishing scripts (publish-all, publish-preview)
  • Uses the same pnpm workspace filtering pattern: --filter "./packages/**" -r
  • Maintains the established script naming convention
  • Properly placed alphabetically in the scripts section

Command Analysis

The added command: pnpm --filter "./packages/**" -r publish --access public --tag canary --no-git-checks

Breakdown:

  • --filter "./packages/**": Targets all packages in the packages directory (consistent with monorepo structure)
  • -r: Recursive execution across workspaces
  • --access public: Makes packages publicly available on npm
  • --tag canary: Publishes with the "canary" tag instead of "latest" ✅
  • --no-git-checks: Skips git validation checks ⚠️

⚠️ Potential Concerns

  1. Git Safety: The --no-git-checks flag bypasses git validation, which could allow publishing from:

    • Uncommitted changes
    • Non-main branches without proper validation
    • Dirty working directories

    Recommendation: Consider if this is intentional for canary releases, or if some git validation should remain.

  2. Missing Version Strategy: Canary releases typically need version bumping strategy. The command doesn't specify how versions should be handled for canary releases.

Security Considerations

  • Command is safe - uses standard npm publishing flags
  • Access is appropriately set to public (consistent with existing scripts)
  • No credential exposure or injection vulnerabilities

Performance Considerations

  • Efficient workspace targeting with pnpm filtering
  • No performance concerns identified

📋 Test Coverage

No tests are needed for package.json script additions, but consider:

  • Documenting the new command in project documentation
  • Adding usage examples for when to use canary vs regular publishing

🔍 Comparison with Existing Scripts

  • publish-all: Standard release to latest tag with git checks
  • publish-canary: Pre-release to canary tag without git checks ← NEW
  • publish-preview: Internal preview registry with force flag

The new script fills a legitimate gap for canary/pre-release publishing.

Overall Assessment

This is a solid, straightforward addition that follows project conventions. The --no-git-checks flag is the main consideration point - it's likely intentional for canary workflows but worth confirming it aligns with your release process.

Recommendation: Approve - This change is ready to merge as-is, though you may want to document when to use publish-canary vs publish-all.

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit 33f6485 into dev Jan 16, 2026
8 of 9 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the chore/publish-canary branch January 16, 2026 13:18
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new npm script publish-canary to enable publishing canary versions of packages with the canary dist-tag, bypassing git checks. This is useful for testing pre-release versions without affecting the stable release channel.

Changes:

  • Added publish-canary script to package.json that publishes all workspace packages with the canary tag and skips git checks

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants