Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename Component to ComponentView #3

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 4, 2015
Merged

Rename Component to ComponentView #3

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 4, 2015

Conversation

zenangst
Copy link
Owner

@zenangst zenangst commented Oct 4, 2015

No description provided.


protocol Component {
protocol ComponentView {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't you like just Component? 😃

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was planning on using that for another thing ;) We can revert it back if it doesn't make sense later on :)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just thinking it's not a view, so this name could be confusing.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make another pull request to fix it 😎

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All right 👍

vadymmarkov added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2015
Rename Component to ComponentView
@vadymmarkov vadymmarkov merged commit 57acffb into master Oct 4, 2015
@vadymmarkov vadymmarkov deleted the refactor/naming branch October 4, 2015 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants