docs: Add csharp-ls to C# docs - #59028
Merged
Merged
Conversation
cla-bot
Bot
added
the
cla-signed
MrSubidubi
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2026
MrSubidubi
left a comment
MrSubidubi
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice catch and thanks for fixing this yourself!
Contributor
Author
|
CC @rbstp |
Contributor
Author
|
@MrSubidubi any chance you can create a Zed-internal task to update the marketing website too? It's not high-priority by any chance, but it does confuse people |
Member
|
Already on that. Also, please see the CI style lint |
Contributor
Author
|
Aaah, |
Member
|
No worries, all good and no rush! I'll also see that I review the extension PR later today |
Member
|
/cherry-pick preview |
MrSubidubi
enabled auto-merge
June 10, 2026 14:17
This was referenced Jun 10, 2026
zed-zippy Bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2026
) Cherry-pick of #59028 to preview ---- I was chatting with somebody today and they told me Zed is terrible because it [only supports OmniSharp for C# as per the marketing site](https://zed.dev/languages/csharp) which I knew 100% to be false. While looking to do a quick fix for that, I realized the Zed marketing website code is not part of this repo (as [confirmed by a quick search](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Azed-industries%2Fzed+LINQ+expressions&type=code)) but that [Zed C# docs](https://zed.dev/docs/languages/csharp) are part of the repo and they too don't include the changes from zed-extensions/csharp#77. Here's a quick update for that! I did test that `csharp-ls` actually receives the [extra settings](https://github.com/razzmatazz/csharp-language-server#configuration) by setting `"razorSupport": true` and confirming that with the LSP logs. **Note**: I'd wait for zed-extensions/csharp#89 to be merged before merging this PR. Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards ([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) and [icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md) guidelines) - [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A Co-authored-by: Vlad Ionescu <Vlaaaaaaad@users.noreply.github.com>
zed-zippy Bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2026
Cherry-pick of #59028 to stable ---- I was chatting with somebody today and they told me Zed is terrible because it [only supports OmniSharp for C# as per the marketing site](https://zed.dev/languages/csharp) which I knew 100% to be false. While looking to do a quick fix for that, I realized the Zed marketing website code is not part of this repo (as [confirmed by a quick search](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Azed-industries%2Fzed+LINQ+expressions&type=code)) but that [Zed C# docs](https://zed.dev/docs/languages/csharp) are part of the repo and they too don't include the changes from zed-extensions/csharp#77. Here's a quick update for that! I did test that `csharp-ls` actually receives the [extra settings](https://github.com/razzmatazz/csharp-language-server#configuration) by setting `"razorSupport": true` and confirming that with the LSP logs. **Note**: I'd wait for zed-extensions/csharp#89 to be merged before merging this PR. Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards ([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) and [icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md) guidelines) - [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A Co-authored-by: Vlad Ionescu <Vlaaaaaaad@users.noreply.github.com>
This was referenced Jun 10, 2026
This was referenced Jun 18, 2026
Closed
This was referenced Jul 1, 2026
This was referenced Jul 10, 2026
jonx
pushed a commit
to jonx/zed-aros
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2026
I was chatting with somebody today and they told me Zed is terrible because it [only supports OmniSharp for C# as per the marketing site](https://zed.dev/languages/csharp) which I knew 100% to be false. While looking to do a quick fix for that, I realized the Zed marketing website code is not part of this repo (as [confirmed by a quick search](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Azed-industries%2Fzed+LINQ+expressions&type=code)) but that [Zed C# docs](https://zed.dev/docs/languages/csharp) are part of the repo and they too don't include the changes from zed-extensions/csharp#77. Here's a quick update for that! I did test that `csharp-ls` actually receives the [extra settings](https://github.com/razzmatazz/csharp-language-server#configuration) by setting `"razorSupport": true` and confirming that with the LSP logs. **Note**: I'd wait for zed-extensions/csharp#89 to be merged before merging this PR. Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards ([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) and [icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md) guidelines) - [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A
jolutz
pushed a commit
to jolutz/zed
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
… preview) (zed-industries#59032) Cherry-pick of zed-industries#59028 to preview ---- I was chatting with somebody today and they told me Zed is terrible because it [only supports OmniSharp for C# as per the marketing site](https://zed.dev/languages/csharp) which I knew 100% to be false. While looking to do a quick fix for that, I realized the Zed marketing website code is not part of this repo (as [confirmed by a quick search](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Azed-industries%2Fzed+LINQ+expressions&type=code)) but that [Zed C# docs](https://zed.dev/docs/languages/csharp) are part of the repo and they too don't include the changes from zed-extensions/csharp#77. Here's a quick update for that! I did test that `csharp-ls` actually receives the [extra settings](https://github.com/razzmatazz/csharp-language-server#configuration) by setting `"razorSupport": true` and confirming that with the LSP logs. **Note**: I'd wait for zed-extensions/csharp#89 to be merged before merging this PR. Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards ([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) and [icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md) guidelines) - [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A Co-authored-by: Vlad Ionescu <Vlaaaaaaad@users.noreply.github.com>
jolutz
pushed a commit
to jolutz/zed
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
I was chatting with somebody today and they told me Zed is terrible because it [only supports OmniSharp for C# as per the marketing site](https://zed.dev/languages/csharp) which I knew 100% to be false. While looking to do a quick fix for that, I realized the Zed marketing website code is not part of this repo (as [confirmed by a quick search](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Azed-industries%2Fzed+LINQ+expressions&type=code)) but that [Zed C# docs](https://zed.dev/docs/languages/csharp) are part of the repo and they too don't include the changes from zed-extensions/csharp#77. Here's a quick update for that! I did test that `csharp-ls` actually receives the [extra settings](https://github.com/razzmatazz/csharp-language-server#configuration) by setting `"razorSupport": true` and confirming that with the LSP logs. **Note**: I'd wait for zed-extensions/csharp#89 to be merged before merging this PR. Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards ([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) and [icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md) guidelines) - [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was chatting with somebody today and they told me Zed is terrible because it only supports OmniSharp for C# as per the marketing site which I knew 100% to be false. While looking to do a quick fix for that, I realized the Zed marketing website code is not part of this repo (as confirmed by a quick search) but that Zed C# docs are part of the repo and they too don't include the changes from zed-extensions/csharp#77. Here's a quick update for that!
I did test that
csharp-lsactually receives the extra settings by setting"razorSupport": trueand confirming that with the LSP logs.Note: I'd wait for zed-extensions/csharp#89 to be merged before merging this PR.
Self-Review Checklist:
Release Notes: