editor: Extract fold and selection out of editor.rs - #56070
Merged
SomeoneToIgnore merged 7 commits intoMay 7, 2026
Merged
Conversation
fold.rs and selection.rs out of editor.rs
fold.rs and selection.rs out of editor.rsfold and selection out of editor.rs
SomeoneToIgnore
enabled auto-merge
May 7, 2026 15:51
jonx
pushed a commit
to jonx/zed-aros
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2026
…ries#56070) cc @SomeoneToIgnore ## Summary Follow-up to zed-industries#56030 This mechanically extracts two editor topics into focused sibling modules: - `crates/editor/src/fold.rs` - `crates/editor/src/selection.rs` One odd boundary remains: several selection state types still live in `editor.rs`. I didn't move them because those caused that "huge 11k diff" in the previous PR, so I propose to move them later. Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) - [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A
jolutz
pushed a commit
to jolutz/zed
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
…ries#56070) cc @SomeoneToIgnore ## Summary Follow-up to zed-industries#56030 This mechanically extracts two editor topics into focused sibling modules: - `crates/editor/src/fold.rs` - `crates/editor/src/selection.rs` One odd boundary remains: several selection state types still live in `editor.rs`. I didn't move them because those caused that "huge 11k diff" in the previous PR, so I propose to move them later. Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) - [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cc @SomeoneToIgnore
Summary
Follow-up to #56030
This mechanically extracts two editor topics into focused sibling modules:
crates/editor/src/fold.rscrates/editor/src/selection.rsOne odd boundary remains: several selection state types still live in
editor.rs. I didn't move them because those caused that "huge 11k diff" in the previous PR, so I propose to move them later.Self-Review Checklist:
Release Notes: