editor: Extract Diagnostics code out of editor.rs - #55747
Merged
SomeoneToIgnore merged 4 commits intoMay 5, 2026
Merged
Conversation
SomeoneToIgnore
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great, thank you for the example, the idea seems to be well demonstrated and great if we can process each move sequentially, making some notes between steps if necessary.
Here, some overly public members are somewhat odd to expose: let's check out the usages of each entry moved and see if that could be inlined/made private/etc.
In some cases, cargo does not emit warnings for items that are pub but not used anywhere, so it's nice to make some tidy up if we're onto it anyway.
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks, agreed. I tightened this up by:
I kept the remaining public methods because they still have cross-crate callers from |
SomeoneToIgnore
approved these changes
May 5, 2026
SomeoneToIgnore
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice, thank you.
SomeoneToIgnore
enabled auto-merge
May 5, 2026 15:39
ebaah46
pushed a commit
to ebaah46/zed
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2026
…5747) cc @SomeoneToIgnore ## Summary Follow-up to zed-industries#55352, where the conclusion was to split `editor.rs` incrementally by topic instead of all at once. This mechanically extracts diagnostics-related editor code into `crates/editor/src/editor/diagnostics.rs` while preserving the existing public API via re-exports. ## Testing - `cargo check -p editor --lib` - `cargo check -p diagnostics --lib` - `cargo check -p diagnostics --tests` Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) - [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A
jonx
pushed a commit
to jonx/zed-aros
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2026
…5747) cc @SomeoneToIgnore ## Summary Follow-up to zed-industries#55352, where the conclusion was to split `editor.rs` incrementally by topic instead of all at once. This mechanically extracts diagnostics-related editor code into `crates/editor/src/editor/diagnostics.rs` while preserving the existing public API via re-exports. ## Testing - `cargo check -p editor --lib` - `cargo check -p diagnostics --lib` - `cargo check -p diagnostics --tests` Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) - [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A
jolutz
pushed a commit
to jolutz/zed
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
…5747) cc @SomeoneToIgnore ## Summary Follow-up to zed-industries#55352, where the conclusion was to split `editor.rs` incrementally by topic instead of all at once. This mechanically extracts diagnostics-related editor code into `crates/editor/src/editor/diagnostics.rs` while preserving the existing public API via re-exports. ## Testing - `cargo check -p editor --lib` - `cargo check -p diagnostics --lib` - `cargo check -p diagnostics --tests` Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) - [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - N/A
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cc @SomeoneToIgnore
Summary
Follow-up to #55352, where the conclusion was to split
editor.rsincrementally by topic instead of all at once.This mechanically extracts diagnostics-related editor code into
crates/editor/src/editor/diagnostics.rswhile preserving the existing public API via re-exports.Testing
cargo check -p editor --libcargo check -p diagnostics --libcargo check -p diagnostics --testsSelf-Review Checklist:
Release Notes: