Update Rust crate wasmtime to v36.0.7 [SECURITY] - #53553
Merged
Merged
Conversation
SomeoneToIgnore
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2026
piper-of-dawn
pushed a commit
to piper-of-dawn/zed
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2026
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [wasmtime](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime) | workspace.dependencies | patch | `36.0.6` → `36.0.7` | --- > [!WARNING] > Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the [Dependency Dashboard](..zed-industries/issues/15138) for more information. ### GitHub Vulnerability Alerts #### [CVE-2026-34941](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv) ### Summary Wasmtime contains a vulnerability where when transcoding a UTF-16 string to the latin1+utf16 component-model encoding it would incorrectly validate the byte length of the input string when performing a bounds check. Specifically the number of code units were checked instead of the byte length, which is twice the size of the code units. This vulnerability can cause the host to read beyond the end of a WebAssembly's linear memory in an attempt to transcode nonexistent bytes. In Wasmtime's default configuration this will read unmapped memory on a guard page, terminating the process with a segfault. Wasmtime can be configured, however, without guard pages which would mean that host memory beyond the end of linear memory may be read and interpreted as UTF-16. A host segfault is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Wasmtime, and possibly being able to read beyond the end of linear memory is additionally a vulnerability. Note that reading beyond the end of linear memory requires nonstandard configuration of Wasmtime, specifically with guard pages disabled. ### Impact This is an out-of-bounds memory access. Any user running untrusted wasm components that use cross-component string passing (with UTF-16 source and latin1+utf16 destination encodings) is affected. - With guard pages: Denial of service. The host process crashes with SIGBUS/SIGSEGV. - Without guard pages: Potential information disclosure. The guest can read host memory beyond its linear memory allocation. Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. Workarounds There is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime. #### [CVE-2026-34942](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775) ### Impact Wasmtime's implementation of transcoding strings into the Component Model's `utf16` or `latin1+utf16` encodings improperly verified the alignment of reallocated strings. This meant that unaligned pointers could be passed to the host for transcoding which would trigger a host panic. This panic is possible to trigger from malicious guests which transfer very specific strings across components with specific addresses. Host panics are considered a DoS vector in Wasmtime as the panic conditions are controlled by the guest in this situation. ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds There is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime. #### [CVE-2026-34943](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq) ### Impact Wasmtime contains a possible panic which can happen when a `flags`-typed component model value is lifted with the `Val` type. If bits are set outside of the set of flags the component model specifies that these bits should be ignored but Wasmtime will panic when this value is lifted. This panic only affects wasmtime's implementation of lifting into `Val`, not when using the `flags!` macro. This additionally only affects `flags`-typed values which are part of a WIT interface. This has the risk of being a guest-controlled panic within the host which Wasmtime considers a DoS vector. ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds There is no workaround for this bug if a host meets the criteria to be affected. To be affected a host must be using `wasmtime::component::Val` and possibly work with a `flags` type in the component model. #### [CVE-2026-34944](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv) On x86-64 platforms with SSE3 disabled Wasmtime's compilation of the `f64x2.splat` WebAssembly instruction with Cranelift may load 8 more bytes than is necessary. When [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are disabled this can result in a uncaught segfault due to loading from unmapped guard pages. With guard pages disabled it's possible for out-of-sandbox data to be loaded, but this data is not visible to WebAssembly guests. ### Details The `f64x2.splat` operator, when operating on a value loaded from a memory (for example with f64.load), compiles with Cranelift to code on x86-64 without SSE3 that loads 128 bits (16 bytes) rather than the expected 64 bits (8 bytes) from memory. When the address is in-bounds for a (correct) 8-byte load but not an (incorrect) 16-byte load, this can load beyond memory by up to 8 bytes. This can result in three different behaviors depending on Wasmtime's configuration: 1. If guard pages are disabled then this extra data will be loaded. The extra data is present in the upper bits of a register, but the upper bits are not visible to WebAssembly guests. Actually witnessing this data would require a different bug in Cranelift, of which none are known. Thus in this situation while it's something we're patching in Cranelift it's not a security issue. 2. If guard pages are enabled, and [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are enabled, then this operation will result in a safe WebAssembly trap. The trap is incorrect because the load is not out-of-bounds as defined by WebAssembly, but this mistakenly widened load will load bytes from an unmapped guard page, causing a segfault which is caught and handled as a Wasm trap. In this situation this is not a security issue, but we're patching Cranelift to fix the WebAssembly behavior. 3. If guard pages are enabled, and [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are disabled, then this operation results in an uncaught segfault. Like the previous case with guard pages enabled this will load from an unmapped guard page. Unlike before, however, signals-based-traps are disabled meaning that signal handlers aren't configured. The resulting segfault will, by default, terminate the process. This is a security issue from a DoS perspective, but does not represent an arbitrary read or write from WebAssembly, for example. Wasmtime's default configuration is case (2) in this case. That means that Wasmtime, by default, incorrectly executes this WebAssembly instruction but does not have insecure behavior. ### Impact If [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are disabled and guard pages are enabled then guests can trigger an uncaught segfault in the host, likely aborting the host process. This represents, for example, a DoS vector for WebAssembly guests. This bug does not affect Wasmtime's default configuration and requires [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) to be disabled. This bug only affects the x86-64 target with the SSE3 feature disabled and the Cranelift backend (Wasmtime's default backend). ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds This bug only affects x86-64 hosts where SSE3 is disabled. If SSE3 is enabled or if a non-x86-64 host is used then hosts are not affect. Otherwise there are no known workarounds to this issue. #### [CVE-2026-34945](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946) ### Impact Wasmtime's Winch compiler contains a bug where a 64-bit table, part of the memory64 proposal of WebAssembly, incorrectly translated the `table.size` instruction. This bug could lead to disclosing data on the host's stack to WebAssembly guests. The host's stack can possibly contain sensitive data related to other host-originating operations which is not intended to be disclosed to guests. This bug specifically arose from a mistake where the return value of `table.size` was statically typed as a 32-bit integer, as opposed to consulting the table's index type to see how large the returned register could be. When combined with details about Wnich's ABI, such as multi-value returns, this can be combined to read stack data from the host, within a guest. This information disclosure should not be possible in WebAssembly, violates spec semantics, and is a vulnerability in Wasmtime. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds Users of Cranelift are not affected by this issue, but users of Winch have no workarounds other than disabling the `Config::wasm_memory64` proposal. #### [CVE-2026-34946](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw) ### Impact Wasmtime's Winch compiler contains a vulnerability where the compilation of the `table.fill` instruction can result in a host panic. This means that a valid guest can be compiled with Winch, on any architecture, and cause the host to panic. This represents a denial-of-service vulnerability in Wasmtime due to guests being able to trigger a panic. The specific issue is that a historical refactoring, #&zed-industries#8203;11254, changed how compiled code referenced tables within the `table.*` instructions. This refactoring forgot to update the Winch code paths associated as well, meaning that Winch was using the wrong indexing scheme. Due to the feature support of Winch the only problem that can result is tables being mixed up or nonexistent tables being used, meaning that the guest is limited to panicking the host (using a nonexistent table), or executing spec-incorrect behavior and modifying the wrong table. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds Users of Cranelift are not affected by this issue, but for users of Winch there is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime. #### [CVE-2026-34971](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w) ### Impact Wasmtime's Cranelift compilation backend contains a bug on aarch64 when performing a certain shape of heap accesses which means that the wrong address is accessed. When combined with explicit bounds checks a guest WebAssembly module this can create a situation where there are two diverging computations for the same address: one for the address to bounds-check and one for the address to load. This difference in address being operated on means that a guest module can pass a bounds check but then load a different address. Combined together this enables an arbitrary read/write primitive for guest WebAssembly when accesssing host memory. This is a sandbox escape as guests are able to read/write arbitrary host memory. This vulnerability has a few ingredients, all of which must be met, for this situation to occur and bypass the sandbox restrictions: * This miscompiled shape of load only occurs on 64-bit WebAssembly linear memories, or when `Config::wasm_memory64` is enabled. 32-bit WebAssembly is not affected. * Spectre mitigations or signals-based-traps must be disabled. When spectre mitigations are enabled then the offending shape of load is not generated. When signals-based-traps are disabled then spectre mitigations are also automatically disabled. The specific bug in Cranelift is a miscompile of a load of the shape `load(iadd(base, ishl(index, amt)))` where `amt` is a constant. The `amt` value is masked incorrectly to test if it's a certain value, and this incorrect mask means that Cranelift can pattern-match this lowering rule during instruction selection erroneously, diverging from WebAssembly's and Cranelift's semantics. This incorrect lowering would, for example, load an address much further away than intended as the correct address's computation would have wrapped around to a smaller value insetad. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds This bug only affects users of Cranelift on aarch64. Cranelift on other platforms is not affected. Additionally this only affects 64-bit WebAssembly linear memories, so if `Config::wasm_memory64` is disabled then hosts are not affected. Note that `Config::wasm_memory64` is enabled by default. If spectre mitigations are enabled, which are enabled by default, then hosts are not affected by this issue. #### [CVE-2026-34988](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p) ### Impact Wasmtime's implementation of its pooling allocator contains a bug where in certain configurations the contents of linear memory can be leaked from one instance to the next. The implementation of resetting the virtual memory permissions for linear memory used the wrong predicate to determine if resetting was necessary, where the compilation process used a different predicate. This divergence meant that the pooling allocator incorrectly deduced at runtime that resetting virtual memory permissions was not necessary while compile-time determine that virtual memory could be relied upon. Exposing this bug requires specific configuration values to be used. If any of these configurations are not applicable then this bug does not happen: * The pooling allocator must be in use. * The `Config::memory_guard_size` configuration option must be 0. * The `Config::memory_reservation` configuration must be less than 4GiB. * The pooling allocator must be configured with `max_memory_size` the same as the `memory_reservation` value. If all of these conditions are applicable then when a linear memory is reused the VM permissions of the previous iteration are not reset. This means that the compiled code, which is assuming out-of-bounds loads will segfault, will not actually segfault and can read the previous contents of linear memory if it was previously mapped. This represents a data leakage vulnerability between guest WebAssembly instances which breaks WebAssembly's semantics and additionally breaks the sandbox that Wasmtime provides. Wasmtime is not vulnerable to this issue with its default settings, nor with the default settings of the pooling allocator, but embeddings are still allowed to configure these values to cause this vulnerability. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds All four conditions above must be met to be vulnerable to this bug, and users can work around this bug by adjusting any of the above conditions. For example it is strongly recommended that guard pages are configured for linear memories which would make this bug not applicable. #### [CVE-2026-35195](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm) ### Impact Wasmtime's implementation of transcoding strings between components contains a bug where the return value of a guest component's `realloc` is not validated before the host attempts to write through the pointer. This enables a guest to cause the host to write arbitrary transcoded string bytes to an arbitrary location up to 4GiB away from the base of linear memory. These writes on the host could hit unmapped memory or could corrupt host data structures depending on Wasmtime's configuration. Wasmtime by default reserves 4GiB of virtual memory for a guest's linear memory meaning that this bug will by default on hosts cause the host to hit unmapped memory and abort the process due to an unhandled fault. Wasmtime can be configured, however, to reserve less memory for a guest and to remove all guard pages, so some configurations of Wasmtime may lead to corruption of data outside of a guest's linear memory, such as host data structures or other guests's linear memories. ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds There is no known workaround for this issue and affected hosts/embeddings are recommended to upgrade. --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>bytecodealliance/wasmtime (wasmtime)</summary> ### [`v36.0.7`](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/releases/tag/v36.0.7) [Compare Source](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/compare/v36.0.6...v36.0.7) #### 36.0.7 Released 2026-04-09. ##### Fixed - Miscompiled guest heap access enables sandbox escape on aarch64 Cranelift. [GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w) - Wasmtime with Winch compiler backend may allow a sandbox-escaping memory access. [GHSA-xx5w-cvp6-jv83](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-xx5w-cvp6-jv83) - Out-of-bounds write or crash when transcoding component model strings. [GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm) - Host panic when Winch compiler executes `table.fill`. [GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw) - Wasmtime segfault or unused out-of-sandbox load with `f64x2.splat` operator on x86-64. [GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv) - Improperly masked return value from `table.grow` with Winch compiler backend. [GHSA-f984-pcp8-v2p7](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-f984-pcp8-v2p7) - Panic when transcoding misaligned utf-16 strings. [GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775) - Panic when lifting `flags` component value. [GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq) - Heap OOB read in component model UTF-16 to latin1+utf16 string transcoding. [GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv) - Data leakage between pooling allocator instances. [GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p) - Host data leakage with 64-bit tables and Winch. [GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: (in timezone America/New_York) - Branch creation - "" - Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined) 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- Release Notes: - N/A <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0My4xMTAuMiIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQzLjExMC4yIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6W119--> Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Zenor27
pushed a commit
to Zenor27/zed
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2026
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [wasmtime](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime) | workspace.dependencies | patch | `36.0.6` → `36.0.7` | --- > [!WARNING] > Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the [Dependency Dashboard](..zed-industries/issues/15138) for more information. ### GitHub Vulnerability Alerts #### [CVE-2026-34941](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv) ### Summary Wasmtime contains a vulnerability where when transcoding a UTF-16 string to the latin1+utf16 component-model encoding it would incorrectly validate the byte length of the input string when performing a bounds check. Specifically the number of code units were checked instead of the byte length, which is twice the size of the code units. This vulnerability can cause the host to read beyond the end of a WebAssembly's linear memory in an attempt to transcode nonexistent bytes. In Wasmtime's default configuration this will read unmapped memory on a guard page, terminating the process with a segfault. Wasmtime can be configured, however, without guard pages which would mean that host memory beyond the end of linear memory may be read and interpreted as UTF-16. A host segfault is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Wasmtime, and possibly being able to read beyond the end of linear memory is additionally a vulnerability. Note that reading beyond the end of linear memory requires nonstandard configuration of Wasmtime, specifically with guard pages disabled. ### Impact This is an out-of-bounds memory access. Any user running untrusted wasm components that use cross-component string passing (with UTF-16 source and latin1+utf16 destination encodings) is affected. - With guard pages: Denial of service. The host process crashes with SIGBUS/SIGSEGV. - Without guard pages: Potential information disclosure. The guest can read host memory beyond its linear memory allocation. Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. Workarounds There is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime. #### [CVE-2026-34942](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775) ### Impact Wasmtime's implementation of transcoding strings into the Component Model's `utf16` or `latin1+utf16` encodings improperly verified the alignment of reallocated strings. This meant that unaligned pointers could be passed to the host for transcoding which would trigger a host panic. This panic is possible to trigger from malicious guests which transfer very specific strings across components with specific addresses. Host panics are considered a DoS vector in Wasmtime as the panic conditions are controlled by the guest in this situation. ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds There is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime. #### [CVE-2026-34943](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq) ### Impact Wasmtime contains a possible panic which can happen when a `flags`-typed component model value is lifted with the `Val` type. If bits are set outside of the set of flags the component model specifies that these bits should be ignored but Wasmtime will panic when this value is lifted. This panic only affects wasmtime's implementation of lifting into `Val`, not when using the `flags!` macro. This additionally only affects `flags`-typed values which are part of a WIT interface. This has the risk of being a guest-controlled panic within the host which Wasmtime considers a DoS vector. ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds There is no workaround for this bug if a host meets the criteria to be affected. To be affected a host must be using `wasmtime::component::Val` and possibly work with a `flags` type in the component model. #### [CVE-2026-34944](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv) On x86-64 platforms with SSE3 disabled Wasmtime's compilation of the `f64x2.splat` WebAssembly instruction with Cranelift may load 8 more bytes than is necessary. When [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are disabled this can result in a uncaught segfault due to loading from unmapped guard pages. With guard pages disabled it's possible for out-of-sandbox data to be loaded, but this data is not visible to WebAssembly guests. ### Details The `f64x2.splat` operator, when operating on a value loaded from a memory (for example with f64.load), compiles with Cranelift to code on x86-64 without SSE3 that loads 128 bits (16 bytes) rather than the expected 64 bits (8 bytes) from memory. When the address is in-bounds for a (correct) 8-byte load but not an (incorrect) 16-byte load, this can load beyond memory by up to 8 bytes. This can result in three different behaviors depending on Wasmtime's configuration: 1. If guard pages are disabled then this extra data will be loaded. The extra data is present in the upper bits of a register, but the upper bits are not visible to WebAssembly guests. Actually witnessing this data would require a different bug in Cranelift, of which none are known. Thus in this situation while it's something we're patching in Cranelift it's not a security issue. 2. If guard pages are enabled, and [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are enabled, then this operation will result in a safe WebAssembly trap. The trap is incorrect because the load is not out-of-bounds as defined by WebAssembly, but this mistakenly widened load will load bytes from an unmapped guard page, causing a segfault which is caught and handled as a Wasm trap. In this situation this is not a security issue, but we're patching Cranelift to fix the WebAssembly behavior. 3. If guard pages are enabled, and [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are disabled, then this operation results in an uncaught segfault. Like the previous case with guard pages enabled this will load from an unmapped guard page. Unlike before, however, signals-based-traps are disabled meaning that signal handlers aren't configured. The resulting segfault will, by default, terminate the process. This is a security issue from a DoS perspective, but does not represent an arbitrary read or write from WebAssembly, for example. Wasmtime's default configuration is case (2) in this case. That means that Wasmtime, by default, incorrectly executes this WebAssembly instruction but does not have insecure behavior. ### Impact If [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are disabled and guard pages are enabled then guests can trigger an uncaught segfault in the host, likely aborting the host process. This represents, for example, a DoS vector for WebAssembly guests. This bug does not affect Wasmtime's default configuration and requires [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) to be disabled. This bug only affects the x86-64 target with the SSE3 feature disabled and the Cranelift backend (Wasmtime's default backend). ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds This bug only affects x86-64 hosts where SSE3 is disabled. If SSE3 is enabled or if a non-x86-64 host is used then hosts are not affect. Otherwise there are no known workarounds to this issue. #### [CVE-2026-34945](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946) ### Impact Wasmtime's Winch compiler contains a bug where a 64-bit table, part of the memory64 proposal of WebAssembly, incorrectly translated the `table.size` instruction. This bug could lead to disclosing data on the host's stack to WebAssembly guests. The host's stack can possibly contain sensitive data related to other host-originating operations which is not intended to be disclosed to guests. This bug specifically arose from a mistake where the return value of `table.size` was statically typed as a 32-bit integer, as opposed to consulting the table's index type to see how large the returned register could be. When combined with details about Wnich's ABI, such as multi-value returns, this can be combined to read stack data from the host, within a guest. This information disclosure should not be possible in WebAssembly, violates spec semantics, and is a vulnerability in Wasmtime. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds Users of Cranelift are not affected by this issue, but users of Winch have no workarounds other than disabling the `Config::wasm_memory64` proposal. #### [CVE-2026-34946](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw) ### Impact Wasmtime's Winch compiler contains a vulnerability where the compilation of the `table.fill` instruction can result in a host panic. This means that a valid guest can be compiled with Winch, on any architecture, and cause the host to panic. This represents a denial-of-service vulnerability in Wasmtime due to guests being able to trigger a panic. The specific issue is that a historical refactoring, #&zed-industries#8203;11254, changed how compiled code referenced tables within the `table.*` instructions. This refactoring forgot to update the Winch code paths associated as well, meaning that Winch was using the wrong indexing scheme. Due to the feature support of Winch the only problem that can result is tables being mixed up or nonexistent tables being used, meaning that the guest is limited to panicking the host (using a nonexistent table), or executing spec-incorrect behavior and modifying the wrong table. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds Users of Cranelift are not affected by this issue, but for users of Winch there is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime. #### [CVE-2026-34971](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w) ### Impact Wasmtime's Cranelift compilation backend contains a bug on aarch64 when performing a certain shape of heap accesses which means that the wrong address is accessed. When combined with explicit bounds checks a guest WebAssembly module this can create a situation where there are two diverging computations for the same address: one for the address to bounds-check and one for the address to load. This difference in address being operated on means that a guest module can pass a bounds check but then load a different address. Combined together this enables an arbitrary read/write primitive for guest WebAssembly when accesssing host memory. This is a sandbox escape as guests are able to read/write arbitrary host memory. This vulnerability has a few ingredients, all of which must be met, for this situation to occur and bypass the sandbox restrictions: * This miscompiled shape of load only occurs on 64-bit WebAssembly linear memories, or when `Config::wasm_memory64` is enabled. 32-bit WebAssembly is not affected. * Spectre mitigations or signals-based-traps must be disabled. When spectre mitigations are enabled then the offending shape of load is not generated. When signals-based-traps are disabled then spectre mitigations are also automatically disabled. The specific bug in Cranelift is a miscompile of a load of the shape `load(iadd(base, ishl(index, amt)))` where `amt` is a constant. The `amt` value is masked incorrectly to test if it's a certain value, and this incorrect mask means that Cranelift can pattern-match this lowering rule during instruction selection erroneously, diverging from WebAssembly's and Cranelift's semantics. This incorrect lowering would, for example, load an address much further away than intended as the correct address's computation would have wrapped around to a smaller value insetad. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds This bug only affects users of Cranelift on aarch64. Cranelift on other platforms is not affected. Additionally this only affects 64-bit WebAssembly linear memories, so if `Config::wasm_memory64` is disabled then hosts are not affected. Note that `Config::wasm_memory64` is enabled by default. If spectre mitigations are enabled, which are enabled by default, then hosts are not affected by this issue. #### [CVE-2026-34988](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p) ### Impact Wasmtime's implementation of its pooling allocator contains a bug where in certain configurations the contents of linear memory can be leaked from one instance to the next. The implementation of resetting the virtual memory permissions for linear memory used the wrong predicate to determine if resetting was necessary, where the compilation process used a different predicate. This divergence meant that the pooling allocator incorrectly deduced at runtime that resetting virtual memory permissions was not necessary while compile-time determine that virtual memory could be relied upon. Exposing this bug requires specific configuration values to be used. If any of these configurations are not applicable then this bug does not happen: * The pooling allocator must be in use. * The `Config::memory_guard_size` configuration option must be 0. * The `Config::memory_reservation` configuration must be less than 4GiB. * The pooling allocator must be configured with `max_memory_size` the same as the `memory_reservation` value. If all of these conditions are applicable then when a linear memory is reused the VM permissions of the previous iteration are not reset. This means that the compiled code, which is assuming out-of-bounds loads will segfault, will not actually segfault and can read the previous contents of linear memory if it was previously mapped. This represents a data leakage vulnerability between guest WebAssembly instances which breaks WebAssembly's semantics and additionally breaks the sandbox that Wasmtime provides. Wasmtime is not vulnerable to this issue with its default settings, nor with the default settings of the pooling allocator, but embeddings are still allowed to configure these values to cause this vulnerability. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds All four conditions above must be met to be vulnerable to this bug, and users can work around this bug by adjusting any of the above conditions. For example it is strongly recommended that guard pages are configured for linear memories which would make this bug not applicable. #### [CVE-2026-35195](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm) ### Impact Wasmtime's implementation of transcoding strings between components contains a bug where the return value of a guest component's `realloc` is not validated before the host attempts to write through the pointer. This enables a guest to cause the host to write arbitrary transcoded string bytes to an arbitrary location up to 4GiB away from the base of linear memory. These writes on the host could hit unmapped memory or could corrupt host data structures depending on Wasmtime's configuration. Wasmtime by default reserves 4GiB of virtual memory for a guest's linear memory meaning that this bug will by default on hosts cause the host to hit unmapped memory and abort the process due to an unhandled fault. Wasmtime can be configured, however, to reserve less memory for a guest and to remove all guard pages, so some configurations of Wasmtime may lead to corruption of data outside of a guest's linear memory, such as host data structures or other guests's linear memories. ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds There is no known workaround for this issue and affected hosts/embeddings are recommended to upgrade. --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>bytecodealliance/wasmtime (wasmtime)</summary> ### [`v36.0.7`](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/releases/tag/v36.0.7) [Compare Source](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/compare/v36.0.6...v36.0.7) #### 36.0.7 Released 2026-04-09. ##### Fixed - Miscompiled guest heap access enables sandbox escape on aarch64 Cranelift. [GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w) - Wasmtime with Winch compiler backend may allow a sandbox-escaping memory access. [GHSA-xx5w-cvp6-jv83](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-xx5w-cvp6-jv83) - Out-of-bounds write or crash when transcoding component model strings. [GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm) - Host panic when Winch compiler executes `table.fill`. [GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw) - Wasmtime segfault or unused out-of-sandbox load with `f64x2.splat` operator on x86-64. [GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv) - Improperly masked return value from `table.grow` with Winch compiler backend. [GHSA-f984-pcp8-v2p7](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-f984-pcp8-v2p7) - Panic when transcoding misaligned utf-16 strings. [GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775) - Panic when lifting `flags` component value. [GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq) - Heap OOB read in component model UTF-16 to latin1+utf16 string transcoding. [GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv) - Data leakage between pooling allocator instances. [GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p) - Host data leakage with 64-bit tables and Winch. [GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: (in timezone America/New_York) - Branch creation - "" - Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined) 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- Release Notes: - N/A <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0My4xMTAuMiIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQzLjExMC4yIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6W119--> Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
jonx
pushed a commit
to jonx/zed-aros
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2026
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [wasmtime](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime) | workspace.dependencies | patch | `36.0.6` → `36.0.7` | --- > [!WARNING] > Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the [Dependency Dashboard](..zed-industries/issues/15138) for more information. ### GitHub Vulnerability Alerts #### [CVE-2026-34941](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv) ### Summary Wasmtime contains a vulnerability where when transcoding a UTF-16 string to the latin1+utf16 component-model encoding it would incorrectly validate the byte length of the input string when performing a bounds check. Specifically the number of code units were checked instead of the byte length, which is twice the size of the code units. This vulnerability can cause the host to read beyond the end of a WebAssembly's linear memory in an attempt to transcode nonexistent bytes. In Wasmtime's default configuration this will read unmapped memory on a guard page, terminating the process with a segfault. Wasmtime can be configured, however, without guard pages which would mean that host memory beyond the end of linear memory may be read and interpreted as UTF-16. A host segfault is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Wasmtime, and possibly being able to read beyond the end of linear memory is additionally a vulnerability. Note that reading beyond the end of linear memory requires nonstandard configuration of Wasmtime, specifically with guard pages disabled. ### Impact This is an out-of-bounds memory access. Any user running untrusted wasm components that use cross-component string passing (with UTF-16 source and latin1+utf16 destination encodings) is affected. - With guard pages: Denial of service. The host process crashes with SIGBUS/SIGSEGV. - Without guard pages: Potential information disclosure. The guest can read host memory beyond its linear memory allocation. Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. Workarounds There is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime. #### [CVE-2026-34942](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775) ### Impact Wasmtime's implementation of transcoding strings into the Component Model's `utf16` or `latin1+utf16` encodings improperly verified the alignment of reallocated strings. This meant that unaligned pointers could be passed to the host for transcoding which would trigger a host panic. This panic is possible to trigger from malicious guests which transfer very specific strings across components with specific addresses. Host panics are considered a DoS vector in Wasmtime as the panic conditions are controlled by the guest in this situation. ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds There is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime. #### [CVE-2026-34943](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq) ### Impact Wasmtime contains a possible panic which can happen when a `flags`-typed component model value is lifted with the `Val` type. If bits are set outside of the set of flags the component model specifies that these bits should be ignored but Wasmtime will panic when this value is lifted. This panic only affects wasmtime's implementation of lifting into `Val`, not when using the `flags!` macro. This additionally only affects `flags`-typed values which are part of a WIT interface. This has the risk of being a guest-controlled panic within the host which Wasmtime considers a DoS vector. ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds There is no workaround for this bug if a host meets the criteria to be affected. To be affected a host must be using `wasmtime::component::Val` and possibly work with a `flags` type in the component model. #### [CVE-2026-34944](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv) On x86-64 platforms with SSE3 disabled Wasmtime's compilation of the `f64x2.splat` WebAssembly instruction with Cranelift may load 8 more bytes than is necessary. When [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are disabled this can result in a uncaught segfault due to loading from unmapped guard pages. With guard pages disabled it's possible for out-of-sandbox data to be loaded, but this data is not visible to WebAssembly guests. ### Details The `f64x2.splat` operator, when operating on a value loaded from a memory (for example with f64.load), compiles with Cranelift to code on x86-64 without SSE3 that loads 128 bits (16 bytes) rather than the expected 64 bits (8 bytes) from memory. When the address is in-bounds for a (correct) 8-byte load but not an (incorrect) 16-byte load, this can load beyond memory by up to 8 bytes. This can result in three different behaviors depending on Wasmtime's configuration: 1. If guard pages are disabled then this extra data will be loaded. The extra data is present in the upper bits of a register, but the upper bits are not visible to WebAssembly guests. Actually witnessing this data would require a different bug in Cranelift, of which none are known. Thus in this situation while it's something we're patching in Cranelift it's not a security issue. 2. If guard pages are enabled, and [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are enabled, then this operation will result in a safe WebAssembly trap. The trap is incorrect because the load is not out-of-bounds as defined by WebAssembly, but this mistakenly widened load will load bytes from an unmapped guard page, causing a segfault which is caught and handled as a Wasm trap. In this situation this is not a security issue, but we're patching Cranelift to fix the WebAssembly behavior. 3. If guard pages are enabled, and [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are disabled, then this operation results in an uncaught segfault. Like the previous case with guard pages enabled this will load from an unmapped guard page. Unlike before, however, signals-based-traps are disabled meaning that signal handlers aren't configured. The resulting segfault will, by default, terminate the process. This is a security issue from a DoS perspective, but does not represent an arbitrary read or write from WebAssembly, for example. Wasmtime's default configuration is case (2) in this case. That means that Wasmtime, by default, incorrectly executes this WebAssembly instruction but does not have insecure behavior. ### Impact If [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) are disabled and guard pages are enabled then guests can trigger an uncaught segfault in the host, likely aborting the host process. This represents, for example, a DoS vector for WebAssembly guests. This bug does not affect Wasmtime's default configuration and requires [signals-based-traps](https://docs.rs/wasmtime/latest/wasmtime/struct.Config.html#method.signals_based_traps) to be disabled. This bug only affects the x86-64 target with the SSE3 feature disabled and the Cranelift backend (Wasmtime's default backend). ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds This bug only affects x86-64 hosts where SSE3 is disabled. If SSE3 is enabled or if a non-x86-64 host is used then hosts are not affect. Otherwise there are no known workarounds to this issue. #### [CVE-2026-34945](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946) ### Impact Wasmtime's Winch compiler contains a bug where a 64-bit table, part of the memory64 proposal of WebAssembly, incorrectly translated the `table.size` instruction. This bug could lead to disclosing data on the host's stack to WebAssembly guests. The host's stack can possibly contain sensitive data related to other host-originating operations which is not intended to be disclosed to guests. This bug specifically arose from a mistake where the return value of `table.size` was statically typed as a 32-bit integer, as opposed to consulting the table's index type to see how large the returned register could be. When combined with details about Wnich's ABI, such as multi-value returns, this can be combined to read stack data from the host, within a guest. This information disclosure should not be possible in WebAssembly, violates spec semantics, and is a vulnerability in Wasmtime. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds Users of Cranelift are not affected by this issue, but users of Winch have no workarounds other than disabling the `Config::wasm_memory64` proposal. #### [CVE-2026-34946](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw) ### Impact Wasmtime's Winch compiler contains a vulnerability where the compilation of the `table.fill` instruction can result in a host panic. This means that a valid guest can be compiled with Winch, on any architecture, and cause the host to panic. This represents a denial-of-service vulnerability in Wasmtime due to guests being able to trigger a panic. The specific issue is that a historical refactoring, #&zed-industries#8203;11254, changed how compiled code referenced tables within the `table.*` instructions. This refactoring forgot to update the Winch code paths associated as well, meaning that Winch was using the wrong indexing scheme. Due to the feature support of Winch the only problem that can result is tables being mixed up or nonexistent tables being used, meaning that the guest is limited to panicking the host (using a nonexistent table), or executing spec-incorrect behavior and modifying the wrong table. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds Users of Cranelift are not affected by this issue, but for users of Winch there is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime. #### [CVE-2026-34971](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w) ### Impact Wasmtime's Cranelift compilation backend contains a bug on aarch64 when performing a certain shape of heap accesses which means that the wrong address is accessed. When combined with explicit bounds checks a guest WebAssembly module this can create a situation where there are two diverging computations for the same address: one for the address to bounds-check and one for the address to load. This difference in address being operated on means that a guest module can pass a bounds check but then load a different address. Combined together this enables an arbitrary read/write primitive for guest WebAssembly when accesssing host memory. This is a sandbox escape as guests are able to read/write arbitrary host memory. This vulnerability has a few ingredients, all of which must be met, for this situation to occur and bypass the sandbox restrictions: * This miscompiled shape of load only occurs on 64-bit WebAssembly linear memories, or when `Config::wasm_memory64` is enabled. 32-bit WebAssembly is not affected. * Spectre mitigations or signals-based-traps must be disabled. When spectre mitigations are enabled then the offending shape of load is not generated. When signals-based-traps are disabled then spectre mitigations are also automatically disabled. The specific bug in Cranelift is a miscompile of a load of the shape `load(iadd(base, ishl(index, amt)))` where `amt` is a constant. The `amt` value is masked incorrectly to test if it's a certain value, and this incorrect mask means that Cranelift can pattern-match this lowering rule during instruction selection erroneously, diverging from WebAssembly's and Cranelift's semantics. This incorrect lowering would, for example, load an address much further away than intended as the correct address's computation would have wrapped around to a smaller value insetad. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds This bug only affects users of Cranelift on aarch64. Cranelift on other platforms is not affected. Additionally this only affects 64-bit WebAssembly linear memories, so if `Config::wasm_memory64` is disabled then hosts are not affected. Note that `Config::wasm_memory64` is enabled by default. If spectre mitigations are enabled, which are enabled by default, then hosts are not affected by this issue. #### [CVE-2026-34988](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p) ### Impact Wasmtime's implementation of its pooling allocator contains a bug where in certain configurations the contents of linear memory can be leaked from one instance to the next. The implementation of resetting the virtual memory permissions for linear memory used the wrong predicate to determine if resetting was necessary, where the compilation process used a different predicate. This divergence meant that the pooling allocator incorrectly deduced at runtime that resetting virtual memory permissions was not necessary while compile-time determine that virtual memory could be relied upon. Exposing this bug requires specific configuration values to be used. If any of these configurations are not applicable then this bug does not happen: * The pooling allocator must be in use. * The `Config::memory_guard_size` configuration option must be 0. * The `Config::memory_reservation` configuration must be less than 4GiB. * The pooling allocator must be configured with `max_memory_size` the same as the `memory_reservation` value. If all of these conditions are applicable then when a linear memory is reused the VM permissions of the previous iteration are not reset. This means that the compiled code, which is assuming out-of-bounds loads will segfault, will not actually segfault and can read the previous contents of linear memory if it was previously mapped. This represents a data leakage vulnerability between guest WebAssembly instances which breaks WebAssembly's semantics and additionally breaks the sandbox that Wasmtime provides. Wasmtime is not vulnerable to this issue with its default settings, nor with the default settings of the pooling allocator, but embeddings are still allowed to configure these values to cause this vulnerability. ### Patches Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds All four conditions above must be met to be vulnerable to this bug, and users can work around this bug by adjusting any of the above conditions. For example it is strongly recommended that guard pages are configured for linear memories which would make this bug not applicable. #### [CVE-2026-35195](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm) ### Impact Wasmtime's implementation of transcoding strings between components contains a bug where the return value of a guest component's `realloc` is not validated before the host attempts to write through the pointer. This enables a guest to cause the host to write arbitrary transcoded string bytes to an arbitrary location up to 4GiB away from the base of linear memory. These writes on the host could hit unmapped memory or could corrupt host data structures depending on Wasmtime's configuration. Wasmtime by default reserves 4GiB of virtual memory for a guest's linear memory meaning that this bug will by default on hosts cause the host to hit unmapped memory and abort the process due to an unhandled fault. Wasmtime can be configured, however, to reserve less memory for a guest and to remove all guard pages, so some configurations of Wasmtime may lead to corruption of data outside of a guest's linear memory, such as host data structures or other guests's linear memories. ### Patches Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime. ### Workarounds There is no known workaround for this issue and affected hosts/embeddings are recommended to upgrade. --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>bytecodealliance/wasmtime (wasmtime)</summary> ### [`v36.0.7`](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/releases/tag/v36.0.7) [Compare Source](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/compare/v36.0.6...v36.0.7) #### 36.0.7 Released 2026-04-09. ##### Fixed - Miscompiled guest heap access enables sandbox escape on aarch64 Cranelift. [GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w) - Wasmtime with Winch compiler backend may allow a sandbox-escaping memory access. [GHSA-xx5w-cvp6-jv83](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-xx5w-cvp6-jv83) - Out-of-bounds write or crash when transcoding component model strings. [GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm) - Host panic when Winch compiler executes `table.fill`. [GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw) - Wasmtime segfault or unused out-of-sandbox load with `f64x2.splat` operator on x86-64. [GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv) - Improperly masked return value from `table.grow` with Winch compiler backend. [GHSA-f984-pcp8-v2p7](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-f984-pcp8-v2p7) - Panic when transcoding misaligned utf-16 strings. [GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775) - Panic when lifting `flags` component value. [GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq) - Heap OOB read in component model UTF-16 to latin1+utf16 string transcoding. [GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv) - Data leakage between pooling allocator instances. [GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p) - Host data leakage with 64-bit tables and Winch. [GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: (in timezone America/New_York) - Branch creation - "" - Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined) 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- Release Notes: - N/A <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0My4xMTAuMiIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQzLjExMC4yIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6W119--> Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
36.0.6→36.0.7Warning
Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2026-34941
Summary
Wasmtime contains a vulnerability where when transcoding a UTF-16 string to the latin1+utf16 component-model encoding it would incorrectly validate the byte length of the input string when performing a bounds check. Specifically the number of code units were checked instead of the byte length, which is twice the size of the code units.
This vulnerability can cause the host to read beyond the end of a WebAssembly's linear memory in an attempt to transcode nonexistent bytes. In Wasmtime's default configuration this will read unmapped memory on a guard page, terminating the process with a segfault. Wasmtime can be configured, however, without guard pages which would mean that host memory beyond the end of linear memory may be read and interpreted as UTF-16.
A host segfault is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Wasmtime, and possibly being able to read beyond the end of linear memory is additionally a vulnerability. Note that reading beyond the end of linear memory requires nonstandard configuration of Wasmtime, specifically with guard pages disabled.
Impact
This is an out-of-bounds memory access. Any user running untrusted wasm components that use cross-component string passing (with UTF-16 source and latin1+utf16 destination encodings) is affected.
Patches
Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime.
Workarounds
There is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime.
CVE-2026-34942
Impact
Wasmtime's implementation of transcoding strings into the Component Model's
utf16orlatin1+utf16encodings improperly verified the alignment of reallocated strings. This meant that unaligned pointers could be passed to the host for transcoding which would trigger a host panic. This panic is possible to trigger from malicious guests which transfer very specific strings across components with specific addresses.Host panics are considered a DoS vector in Wasmtime as the panic conditions are controlled by the guest in this situation.
Patches
Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime.
Workarounds
There is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime.
CVE-2026-34943
Impact
Wasmtime contains a possible panic which can happen when a
flags-typed component model value is lifted with theValtype. If bits are set outside of the set of flags the component model specifies that these bits should be ignored but Wasmtime will panic when this value is lifted. This panic only affects wasmtime's implementation of lifting intoVal, not when using theflags!macro. This additionally only affectsflags-typed values which are part of a WIT interface.This has the risk of being a guest-controlled panic within the host which Wasmtime considers a DoS vector.
Patches
Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime.
Workarounds
There is no workaround for this bug if a host meets the criteria to be affected. To be affected a host must be using
wasmtime::component::Valand possibly work with aflagstype in the component model.CVE-2026-34944
On x86-64 platforms with SSE3 disabled Wasmtime's compilation of the
f64x2.splatWebAssembly instruction with Cranelift may load 8 more bytes than is necessary. When signals-based-traps are disabled this can result in a uncaught segfault due to loading from unmapped guard pages. With guard pages disabled it's possible for out-of-sandbox data to be loaded, but this data is not visible to WebAssembly guests.Details
The
f64x2.splatoperator, when operating on a value loaded from a memory (for example with f64.load), compiles with Cranelift to code on x86-64 without SSE3 that loads 128 bits (16 bytes) rather than the expected 64 bits (8 bytes) from memory. When the address is in-bounds for a (correct) 8-byte load but not an (incorrect) 16-byte load, this can load beyond memory by up to 8 bytes. This can result in three different behaviors depending on Wasmtime's configuration:Wasmtime's default configuration is case (2) in this case. That means that Wasmtime, by default, incorrectly executes this
WebAssembly instruction but does not have insecure behavior.
Impact
If signals-based-traps are disabled and guard pages are enabled then guests can trigger an uncaught segfault in the host, likely aborting the host process. This represents, for example, a DoS vector for WebAssembly guests.
This bug does not affect Wasmtime's default configuration and requires signals-based-traps to be disabled. This bug only affects the x86-64 target with the SSE3 feature disabled and the Cranelift backend (Wasmtime's default backend).
Patches
Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime.
Workarounds
This bug only affects x86-64 hosts where SSE3 is disabled. If SSE3 is enabled or if a non-x86-64 host is used then hosts are not affect. Otherwise there are no known workarounds to this issue.
CVE-2026-34945
Impact
Wasmtime's Winch compiler contains a bug where a 64-bit table, part of the memory64 proposal of WebAssembly, incorrectly translated the
table.sizeinstruction. This bug could lead to disclosing data on the host's stack to WebAssembly guests. The host's stack can possibly contain sensitive data related to other host-originating operations which is not intended to be disclosed to guests.This bug specifically arose from a mistake where the return value of
table.sizewas statically typed as a 32-bit integer, as opposed to consulting the table's index type to see how large the returned register could be. When combined with details about Wnich's ABI, such as multi-value returns, this can be combined to read stack data from the host, within a guest. This information disclosure should not be possible in WebAssembly, violates spec semantics, and is a vulnerability in Wasmtime.Patches
Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime.
Workarounds
Users of Cranelift are not affected by this issue, but users of Winch have no workarounds other than disabling the
Config::wasm_memory64proposal.CVE-2026-34946
Impact
Wasmtime's Winch compiler contains a vulnerability where the compilation of the
table.fillinstruction can result in a host panic. This means that a valid guest can be compiled with Winch, on any architecture, and cause the host to panic. This represents a denial-of-service vulnerability in Wasmtime due to guests being able to trigger a panic.The specific issue is that a historical refactoring, #11254, changed how compiled code referenced tables within the
table.*instructions. This refactoring forgot to update the Winch code paths associated as well, meaning that Winch was using the wrong indexing scheme. Due to the feature support of Winch the only problem that can result is tables being mixed up or nonexistent tables being used, meaning that the guest is limited to panicking the host (using a nonexistent table), or executing spec-incorrect behavior and modifying the wrong table.Patches
Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime.
Workarounds
Users of Cranelift are not affected by this issue, but for users of Winch there is no workaround for this bug. Hosts are recommended to updated to a patched version of Wasmtime.
CVE-2026-34971
Impact
Wasmtime's Cranelift compilation backend contains a bug on aarch64 when performing a certain shape of heap accesses which means that the wrong address is accessed. When combined with explicit bounds checks a guest WebAssembly module this can create a situation where there are two diverging computations for the same address: one for the address to bounds-check and one for the address to load. This difference in address being operated on means that a guest module can pass a bounds check but then load a different address. Combined together this enables an arbitrary read/write primitive for guest WebAssembly when accesssing host memory. This is a sandbox escape as guests are able to read/write arbitrary host memory.
This vulnerability has a few ingredients, all of which must be met, for this situation to occur and bypass the sandbox restrictions:
Config::wasm_memory64is enabled. 32-bit WebAssembly is not affected.The specific bug in Cranelift is a miscompile of a load of the shape
load(iadd(base, ishl(index, amt)))whereamtis a constant. Theamtvalue is masked incorrectly to test if it's a certain value, and this incorrect mask means that Cranelift can pattern-match this lowering rule during instruction selection erroneously, diverging from WebAssembly's and Cranelift's semantics. This incorrect lowering would, for example, load an address much further away than intended as the correct address's computation would have wrapped around to a smaller value insetad.Patches
Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime.
Workarounds
This bug only affects users of Cranelift on aarch64. Cranelift on other platforms is not affected. Additionally this only affects 64-bit WebAssembly linear memories, so if
Config::wasm_memory64is disabled then hosts are not affected. Note thatConfig::wasm_memory64is enabled by default. If spectre mitigations are enabled, which are enabled by default, then hosts are not affected by this issue.CVE-2026-34988
Impact
Wasmtime's implementation of its pooling allocator contains a bug where in certain configurations the contents of linear memory can be leaked from one instance to the next. The implementation of resetting the virtual memory permissions for linear memory used the wrong predicate to determine if resetting was necessary, where the compilation process used a different predicate. This divergence meant that the pooling allocator incorrectly deduced at runtime that resetting virtual memory permissions was not necessary while compile-time determine that virtual memory could be relied upon.
Exposing this bug requires specific configuration values to be used. If any of these configurations are not applicable then this bug does not happen:
Config::memory_guard_sizeconfiguration option must be 0.Config::memory_reservationconfiguration must be less than 4GiB.max_memory_sizethe same as thememory_reservationvalue.If all of these conditions are applicable then when a linear memory is reused the VM permissions of the previous iteration are not reset. This means that the compiled code, which is assuming out-of-bounds loads will segfault, will not actually segfault and can read the previous contents of linear memory if it was previously mapped.
This represents a data leakage vulnerability between guest WebAssembly instances which breaks WebAssembly's semantics and additionally breaks the sandbox that Wasmtime provides. Wasmtime is not vulnerable to this issue with its default settings, nor with the default settings of the pooling allocator, but embeddings are still allowed to configure these values to cause this vulnerability.
Patches
Wasmtime 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime.
Workarounds
All four conditions above must be met to be vulnerable to this bug, and users can work around this bug by adjusting any of the above conditions. For example it is strongly recommended that guard pages are configured for linear memories which would make this bug not applicable.
CVE-2026-35195
Impact
Wasmtime's implementation of transcoding strings between components contains a bug where the return value of a guest component's
reallocis not validated before the host attempts to write through the pointer. This enables a guest to cause the host to write arbitrary transcoded string bytes to an arbitrary location up to 4GiB away from the base of linear memory. These writes on the host could hit unmapped memory or could corrupt host data structures depending on Wasmtime's configuration.Wasmtime by default reserves 4GiB of virtual memory for a guest's linear memory meaning that this bug will by default on hosts cause the host to hit unmapped memory and abort the process due to an unhandled fault. Wasmtime can be configured, however, to reserve less memory for a guest and to remove all guard pages, so some configurations of Wasmtime may lead to corruption of data outside of a guest's linear memory, such as host data structures or other guests's linear memories.
Patches
Wasmtime 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1 have been issued to fix this bug. Users are recommended to update to these patched versions of Wasmtime.
Workarounds
There is no known workaround for this issue and affected hosts/embeddings are recommended to upgrade.
Release Notes
bytecodealliance/wasmtime (wasmtime)
v36.0.7Compare Source
36.0.7
Released 2026-04-09.
Fixed
Miscompiled guest heap access enables sandbox escape on aarch64 Cranelift.
GHSA-jhxm-h53p-jm7w
Wasmtime with Winch compiler backend may allow a sandbox-escaping memory
access.
GHSA-xx5w-cvp6-jv83
Out-of-bounds write or crash when transcoding component model strings.
GHSA-394w-hwhg-8vgm
Host panic when Winch compiler executes
table.fill.GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw
Wasmtime segfault or unused out-of-sandbox load with
f64x2.splatoperatoron x86-64.
GHSA-qqfj-4vcm-26hv
Improperly masked return value from
table.growwith Winch compiler backend.GHSA-f984-pcp8-v2p7
Panic when transcoding misaligned utf-16 strings.
GHSA-jxhv-7h78-9775
Panic when lifting
flagscomponent value.GHSA-m758-wjhj-p3jq
Heap OOB read in component model UTF-16 to latin1+utf16 string transcoding.
GHSA-hx6p-xpx3-jvvv
Data leakage between pooling allocator instances.
GHSA-6wgr-89rj-399p
Host data leakage with 64-bit tables and Winch.
GHSA-m9w2-8782-2946
Configuration
📅 Schedule: (in timezone America/New_York)
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
Release Notes: