Add code-lens to show references and impls - #48151
Conversation
|
We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have @mustakimali on file. You can sign our CLA at https://zed.dev/cla. Once you've signed, post a comment here that says '@cla-bot check'. |
f0947ad to
c57afde
Compare
|
We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have @mustakimali on file. You can sign our CLA at https://zed.dev/cla. Once you've signed, post a comment here that says '@cla-bot check'. |
|
We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have @mustakimali on file. You can sign our CLA at https://zed.dev/cla. Once you've signed, post a comment here that says '@cla-bot check'. |
|
We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have @mustakimali on file. You can sign our CLA at https://zed.dev/cla. Once you've signed, post a comment here that says '@cla-bot check'. |
|
- Add method to remove refresh tasks from CodeLensCache - Invalidate code lens cache when relevant LSP events occur - Re-enable code lens caching in LspStore with correct server/version checks - Ensure code lens cache is cleared when servers change or versions update
|
We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have @mustakimali on file. You can sign our CLA at https://zed.dev/cla. Once you've signed, post a comment here that says '@cla-bot check'. |
Refactor rust LSP initialization to set lens and experimental options
|
We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have @mustakimali on file. You can sign our CLA at https://zed.dev/cla. Once you've signed, post a comment here that says '@cla-bot check'. |
|
We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have @mustakimali on file. You can sign our CLA at https://zed.dev/cla. Once you've signed, post a comment here that says '@cla-bot check'. |
Hm, seems that CLA is not signed and no activity for a week or so. I suspect I can work on code lens soon after #48780 is over, so maybe that would be a bit less conflicting way to have the feature working? Will close this one to keep the queue a bit cleaner, thank you. |
That's fine @SomeoneToIgnore - I was making progress very slowly anyway. |

Me and Claude trying to implement: #11565
WIP - buggy.