ignore aider files #358
ignore aider files #358
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@zachmayer has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
aider-instructions.md (1)
14-15: Consider more professional phrasing.Instead of "Feel free to", consider using more direct language like "You may" or simply state the action:
- "Load any required files to chat"
- "Use the repo map as needed"
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~14-~14: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: ...ake do with the information provided. - Feel free to load any files to chat you need to read...(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/aider.yml(3 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)aider-instructions.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
aider-instructions.md
[style] ~14-~14: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: ...ake do with the information provided. - Feel free to load any files to chat you need to read...
(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.gitignore (1)
150-151: LGTM! Appropriate gitignore patterns added.
The new entries follow gitignore best practices:
.aider*will correctly ignore all aider-related files.envis a standard pattern for protecting environment variables
aider-instructions.md (1)
1-18: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive instructions.
The instructions effectively outline the requirements for:
- Code quality (lint-free, modern practices)
- Testing requirements
- Documentation standards
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~14-~14: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: ...ake do with the information provided. - Feel free to load any files to chat you need to read...
(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)
.github/workflows/aider.yml (3)
14-18: LGTM! Well-structured input parameter definition.
The new branch parameter is properly defined with appropriate defaults and descriptions.
69-69: LGTM! Improved issue body handling.
The switch to printf is a good improvement for handling issue body content more reliably.
36-37: Verify branch name validation.
While the change to use a dynamic branch reference is good, ensure the branch name is properly validated to prevent potential security issues.
✅ Verification successful
Branch input is properly validated and secure
The branch input in the workflow is properly configured:
- It's defined as a workflow input parameter with proper description and defaults
- It's used in a controlled environment where only user 'zachmayer' can trigger the workflow (
if: github.actor == 'zachmayer') - The input is used directly with GitHub's actions/checkout which handles branch names securely
- The workflow has appropriate permissions scoping
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other places in workflows that might need similar branch parameter updates
rg -l 'ref:\s*[''"]main[''"]' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the workflow file content to understand the branch input validation
cat .github/workflows/aider.yml
# Also check for any other workflow files that might be using branch inputs
fd . .github/workflows/ -e yml -e yaml --exec cat {}
Length of output: 16804
No description provided.