fix code coverage for dependabot

[zachmayer]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request involve modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for test coverage located in the .github/workflows/test-coverage.yaml file. A conditional statement has been added to the test-coverage job to control its execution based on the actor triggering the workflow. Additionally, the CODECOV_TOKEN environment variable has been introduced and set at the job level, streamlining the upload process for test results to Codecov by removing redundant declarations.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/test-coverage.yaml	Added conditional execution for the test-coverage job based on the actor; introduced CODECOV_TOKEN environment variable; removed redundant CODECOV_TOKEN declaration in the upload step.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant A as Actor
    participant B as GitHub Actions
    participant C as Codecov

    A->>B: Trigger Pull Request
    B->>B: Check Actor
    alt Actor is 'dependabot[bot]'
        B->>C: Upload Test Coverage
    else Other Actor
        B->>C: Upload Test Coverage
    end

Loading

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/test-coverage.yaml (1)

16-16: Simplify the conditional logic

The current condition can be simplified while maintaining the same behavior. The condition runs in all cases except when dependabot triggers non-PR events.

Consider this simpler equivalent:

-    if: (github.actor == 'dependabot[bot]' && github.event_name == 'pull_request') || github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]'
+    if: github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' || github.event_name == 'pull_request'

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83c2e83 and 828b88f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/test-coverage.yaml (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/test-coverage.yaml (1)

19-19: LGTM! Good practice moving CODECOV_TOKEN to job level

The token is properly secured using secrets and its placement at the job level follows best practices by reducing redundancy.

Let's verify no other CODECOV_TOKEN declarations exist in the workflow:

✅ Verification successful

✓ CODECOV_TOKEN configuration is correctly placed and unique

The token is properly configured as a secret at the job level with no redundant declarations across the workflows, following security best practices.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any redundant CODECOV_TOKEN declarations
# Expect: Only one occurrence at the job level

rg "CODECOV_TOKEN" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 124