Compilade/refactor kv cache #1
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Owner
ykhrustalev
commented
Oct 11, 2024
ykhrustalev
commented
- I have read the contributing guidelines
- Self-reported review complexity:
- Low
- Medium
- High
This will be necessary to support Jamba (and other recurrent models mixed with Attention). Doesn't compile yet, and finding a slot isn't yet done correctly for recurrent states.
* llama : begin work on support for variable GQA This will also be useful for Jamba if we consider the Mamba layers to have 0 KV heads. * llama : gracefully fail when not finding hybrid slot
* ggml : simplify SSM-related operators * llama : make recurrent state slot allocation contiguous * llama : adapt internal uses of batches to llama_ubatch
This reduces overhead when running hellaswag on thousands of sequences with very small 100k params Mamba models.
This otherwise was a problem when running the HellaSwag benchmark with small batch sizes, making it crash.
This removes the need for ggml_ssm_conv!!! But performance seems slighly worse on my system, especially for prompt processing. Maybe ggml_mul_mat isn't optimized for small row sizes? More performance testing is necessary until GGML_OP_SSM_CONV is removed. * ggml : make ggml_ssm_scan not modify its source tensors * llama : fix shared recurrent tail cell count for small ubatch sizes Otherwise it was impossible to run the 'parallel' example with '-ub 1' with a Mamba or Jamba model.
* ggml : allow GGML_OP_CONCAT to work on non-contiguous tensors The implementation already supported it, and this makes Mamba's conv step slightly faster.
This can be changed back later if the name change is wrong. I was renaming the functions anyway to generalize kv-cache-related functions to hybrid and recurrent model architectures. I think llama_past is a better name than llama_cache for a combined kv cache and recurrent state cache, because the states it contains pretty much always come before the newly-added ones for any particular sequence. Also 'llama_past_clear' sounds more obvious in what it does than 'llama_kv_cache_clear'. The future is what the models generate. (For embeddings, the kv cache isn't really used anyway) Still, I'm open to better suggestions.
This also slightly reduces the diff from the master branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.