Skip to content

Conversation

@Kmeakin
Copy link
Contributor

@Kmeakin Kmeakin commented Jan 23, 2023

Fixes #471

@brendanzab
Copy link
Member

Very nice, I’m happy with this. Is there anything else that needs to be done to the before merging?

@Kmeakin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kmeakin commented Feb 2, 2023

Very nice, I’m happy with this. Is there anything else that needs to be done to the before merging?

I would like to still use eager evaluation for "runtime" evaluation - ie for fathom norm and fathom data

@Kmeakin Kmeakin marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2023 14:06
@Kmeakin Kmeakin force-pushed the lazy-eval branch 2 times, most recently from e8cd4d3 to 63f6469 Compare February 2, 2023 14:11
@Kmeakin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kmeakin commented Feb 2, 2023

Should types of items/metavars/local vars be lazily evaluated too?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lazy evaluation

2 participants