Skip to content

feat(core): Improve logging and performance of file processing#235

Merged
yamadashy merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/logs
Dec 31, 2024
Merged

feat(core): Improve logging and performance of file processing#235
yamadashy merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/logs

Conversation

@yamadashy
Copy link
Owner

Checklist

  • Run npm run test
  • Run npm run lint

@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.20%. Comparing base (d6a301b) to head (fa99de6).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #235      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.16%   92.20%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          44       44              
  Lines        2080     2090      +10     
  Branches      458      458              
==========================================
+ Hits         1917     1927      +10     
  Misses        163      163              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yamadashy yamadashy merged commit 5821fb1 into main Dec 31, 2024
@yamadashy yamadashy deleted the chore/logs branch December 31, 2024 14:37
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on enhancing logging across multiple file processing and security-related modules. The changes introduce more detailed trace logging in fileCollect.ts, fileProcess.ts, and securityCheck.ts. The modifications primarily involve adding log messages that capture the start and end of file processing operations, including file paths and processing durations. These changes aim to improve observability and provide more granular insights into the file processing workflow without altering the core functionality of the existing code.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/core/file/fileCollect.ts Modified log message from "Processing file" to "Reading file" in readRawFile function
src/core/file/fileProcess.ts Added trace logging for file processing start and end, using process.hrtime.bigint() to measure processing time
src/core/security/securityCheck.ts Enhanced logging in runSecurityCheck function with trace logs for file processing start and completion time

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant FileCollector
    participant FileProcessor
    participant SecurityChecker
    participant Logger

    FileCollector->>Logger: Trace log: "Reading file"
    FileProcessor->>Logger: Trace log: "Processing file start"
    FileProcessor->>SecurityChecker: Run security check
    SecurityChecker->>Logger: Trace log: "Security check start"
    SecurityChecker-->>Logger: Trace log: "Security check complete (duration)"
    FileProcessor->>Logger: Trace log: "Processing file complete (duration)"
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6a301b and fa99de6.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/core/file/fileCollect.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/core/file/fileProcess.ts (4 hunks)
  • src/core/security/securityCheck.ts (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant