Broken link of LICENSE fixed in README

[Kaushik080]

Fixed the broken link of LICENSE in README.
This PR fixes #140

[bolt-new-by-stackblitz]

Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes made in this pull request focus on updating the README.md file. Specifically, the link for the license badge was changed to point from the master branch to the main branch, reflecting a shift in the default branch naming convention. The overall content structure and functionality of the documentation remain unchanged, ensuring that users still have access to comprehensive guidance on using the Repopack tool.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	Updated license badge link from master to main; no other content changes.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Correct LICENSE link (140)	✅

Possibly related PRs

• Improve init command #96: Involves updates to the README.md, enhancing its content and usability.
• docs: update README.md #99: Includes minor fixes to the README.md, aligning with link and formatting updates.
• fix typos and improve grammar in README.md #100: Focuses on improving the clarity and readability of the README.md.
• docs: Add links to glob pattern syntax documentation #111: Enhances the README.md by adding references to glob patterns.
• Update README.md #114: Updates the README.md to improve clarity and accessibility.
• Added a "Back to Top" Button  #116: Adds a "Back to Top" button in the README.md for enhanced navigation.
• Added Contributors and back to top in readme #117: Adds a "Contributors" section and a "Back to Top" link in the README.md.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f29857 and c203947.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• README.md

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[yamadashy]

@Kaushik080
I hadn't realized the link was incorrect. Thank you for finding and fixing it!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.99%. Comparing base (2f29857) to head (c203947).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #141   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.99%   75.99%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        1633     1633           
  Branches      270      270           
=======================================
  Hits         1241     1241           
  Misses        392      392           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.