refactor: refine directory structure and files#108
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications primarily focused on updating import paths across various files in the codebase. Specifically, several modules have been renamed or restructured, leading to changes in the corresponding import statements. These updates affect files related to CLI actions, configuration management, file processing, and output generation. Importantly, the logic and functionality of the existing code remain unchanged, with the primary focus on aligning the codebase with the new module naming conventions. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #108 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.57% 76.57%
=======================================
Files 36 36
Lines 1665 1665
Branches 269 269
=======================================
Hits 1275 1275
Misses 390 390 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
yamadashy
force-pushed
the
chore/refact-codes
branch
from
ed927fa to
487287c
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
tests/cli/actions/versionAction.test.ts (1)
3-3: Consider renaming the imported module for clarity.The import path has been correctly updated to 'packageJsonParse.js'. However, the imported module is still referred to as
packageJsonParser, which might lead to confusion.Consider renaming the import to match the new file name for better clarity:
-import * as packageJsonParser from '../../../src/core/file/packageJsonParse.js'; +import * as packageJsonParse from '../../../src/core/file/packageJsonParse.js';If you make this change, remember to update all references to
packageJsonParserin the file.tests/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
15-33: Consider enhancing test coverage with more specific assertionsWhile the current test case checks for the presence of main sections in the generated output, it might be beneficial to add more specific assertions. This could include checking for the exact content of the user-provided header text and verifying the structure of the generated markdown.
Consider adding assertions like:
expect(output).toContain('Custom header text'); expect(output).toMatch(/^# File Summary\n/m); expect(output).toMatch(/^# Repository Structure\n/m); expect(output).toMatch(/^# Repository Files\n/m);This will ensure that not only the sections are present, but they are also in the correct order and format.
tests/core/tokenCount/tokenCount.test.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM! Consider adding more context to the test suite description.The change from 'tokenCounter' to 'tokenCount' in the describe block is consistent with the module renaming.
For improved clarity, consider expanding the test suite description. Here's a suggestion:
-describe('tokenCount', () => { +describe('TokenCounter - token counting functionality', () => {This change provides more context about what's being tested in this suite.
Line range hint
1-48: Summary: File updates align with project restructuring.The changes in this file are focused on renaming from 'tokenCounter' to 'tokenCount', which aligns with the PR objectives of refining the directory structure. The core functionality of the tests remains unchanged, which is good for maintaining the integrity of the test suite.
As you continue with this refactoring:
- Ensure all references to 'tokenCounter' are updated consistently across the project.
- Update any documentation or comments that might reference the old module name.
- If this module is part of a public API, consider adding a deprecation notice for the old module name to ease transition for any external users.
src/cli/cliRun.ts (1)
5-11: Summary of import path changesThe changes in this file are consistent with the PR objectives of refining the directory structure and files. All modifications are import path updates that reflect a standardization of file naming conventions, particularly for action runners. While these changes don't affect the logic or functionality of the code, they contribute to improved code organization and maintainability.
To ensure the refactoring is complete and consistent:
- Verify that all new file names exist in their respective directories.
- Check that no references to the old file names remain in the codebase.
- Update any documentation or comments that may reference the old file names.
- Consider updating the project's contribution guidelines to reflect the new file naming conventions.
These changes improve the overall structure of the project. To further enhance maintainability, consider:
- Documenting the new file naming conventions in the project's README or contribution guidelines.
- If not already done, implementing a linting rule to enforce the new naming conventions.
src/cli/actions/remoteAction.ts (1)
7-11: Summary of import path changes and potential impactThe changes in this file are limited to updating import paths, which appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort. The following files have been renamed:
errorHandler.js→errorHandle.jscliRunner.js→cliRun.jsdefaultActionRunner.js→defaultAction.jsWhile these changes are straightforward, they may have implications for the wider codebase. Please ensure that:
- All references to these files have been updated consistently across the entire project.
- Any documentation or configuration files referencing these modules have been updated.
- If this is part of a public API, consider the impact on consumers of your package and whether this change requires a major version bump according to semantic versioning principles.
Consider adding a test to your CI pipeline that checks for inconsistent import paths to catch any missed updates in future refactoring efforts.
tests/cli/actions/defaultAction.test.ts (1)
14-14: LGTM! Consider updating related documentation.The change from 'defaultActionRunner' to 'defaultAction' in the test suite description improves clarity. It accurately reflects the focus on the action itself rather than the runner.
Consider updating any related documentation or comments that might still refer to 'defaultActionRunner' to maintain consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (37)
- bin/repopack.cjs (1 hunks)
- bin/repopack.js (1 hunks)
- src/cli/actions/defaultAction.ts (2 hunks)
- src/cli/actions/remoteAction.ts (1 hunks)
- src/cli/actions/versionAction.ts (1 hunks)
- src/cli/cliPrint.ts (1 hunks)
- src/cli/cliRun.ts (1 hunks)
- src/config/configLoad.ts (1 hunks)
- src/config/configValidate.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/file/fileProcess.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/file/fileSearch.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputGenerate.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/packager.ts (1 hunks)
- src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/cli/actions/defaultAction.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/cli/actions/initAction.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/cli/actions/remoteAction.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/cli/actions/versionAction.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/config/configLoad.test.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/config/configValidate.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/file/fileCollect.test.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/core/file/fileManipulate.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/file/filePathSort.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/file/fileProcess.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/file/fileSearch.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/file/packageJsonParse.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/output/outputGenerate.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/packager.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/security/securityCheck.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/tokenCount/tokenCount.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/integration-tests/packager.test.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- src/cli/actions/defaultAction.ts
- src/cli/actions/versionAction.ts
- src/config/configValidate.ts
- src/core/file/fileProcess.ts
- src/core/file/fileSearch.ts
- src/core/output/outputGenerate.ts
- src/index.ts
- tests/config/configValidate.test.ts
- tests/core/file/fileSearch.test.ts
- tests/core/output/outputGenerate.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (69)
tests/cli/actions/versionAction.test.ts (4)
2-2: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path for
runVersionActionhas been updated to reflect the new module name. This change is consistent with the overall refactoring mentioned in the PR objectives.
6-6: LGTM: Mock path updated correctly.The mock path has been updated to reflect the new module name 'packageJsonParse'. This change is consistent with the import statement update.
8-8: LGTM: Test suite description updated correctly.The test suite description has been updated from 'versionActionRunner' to 'versionAction', which accurately reflects the module being tested and is consistent with the import statement changes.
Line range hint
1-28: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The file has been successfully updated to reflect the new module names and directory structure. The core functionality of the test remains unchanged, which is excellent. The only suggestion is to consider renaming the imported
packageJsonParsertopackageJsonParsefor consistency, but this is a minor point.tests/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.test.ts (2)
9-9: Improved test suite descriptionThe test suite description has been updated from 'outputGenerator' to 'markdownStyle'. This change improves the clarity of the test suite's purpose by making it more specific to the module being tested.
3-4: Verify the correctness of the updated import paths.The import paths have been updated to reflect the new directory structure. This change aligns with the PR objective of refining the directory structure. However, we should verify that these new paths are correct and consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Import paths are correct and consistent across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the imported files and their exports # Test 1: Check if the imported files exist echo "Checking if imported files exist:" fd -e js -p src/core/output/outputGenerate.js src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.js # Test 2: Verify the exports from these files echo "\nVerifying exports from outputGenerate.js:" rg -U --type typescript "export.*buildOutputGeneratorContext" src/core/output/outputGenerate.js echo "\nVerifying exports from markdownStyle.js:" rg -U --type typescript "export.*generateMarkdownStyle" src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.jsLength of output: 767
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the imported files and their exports # Test 1: Check if the imported files exist echo "Checking if imported files exist:" ls src/core/output/outputGenerate.js ls src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.js # Test 2: Verify the exports from these files echo "\nVerifying exports from outputGenerate.js:" rg -U --type javascript "export\s+.*buildOutputGeneratorContext" src/core/output/outputGenerate.js echo "\nVerifying exports from markdownStyle.js:" rg -U --type javascript "export\s+.*generateMarkdownStyle" src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.jsLength of output: 810
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the imported files and verify their exports # Test 1: Search for outputGenerate.js and markdownStyle.js in the repository echo "Searching for outputGenerate.js and markdownStyle.js in the repository:" fd --type f --extension js "outputGenerate.js" "markdownStyle.js" # Assuming the above commands find the files, assign their paths to variables OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH=$(fd --type f --extension js "outputGenerate.js" | head -n 1) MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH=$(fd --type f --extension js "markdownStyle.js" | head -n 1) # Check if OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH is found if [ -f "$OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH" ]; then echo "\nVerifying exports from $OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH:" rg -U --type javascript "export\s+.*buildOutputGeneratorContext" "$OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH" else echo "\nError: outputGenerate.js not found in the repository." fi # Check if MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH is found if [ -f "$MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH" ]; then echo "\nVerifying exports from $MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH:" rg -U --type javascript "export\s+.*generateMarkdownStyle" "$MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH" else echo "\nError: markdownStyle.js not found in the repository." fiLength of output: 760
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the imported TypeScript files and verify their exports # Test 1: Search for outputGenerate.ts and markdownStyle.ts in the repository echo "Searching for outputGenerate.ts and markdownStyle.ts in the repository:" fd --type f --extension ts "outputGenerate.ts" "markdownStyle.ts" # Assign their paths to variables OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH=$(fd --type f --extension ts "outputGenerate.ts" | head -n 1) MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH=$(fd --type f --extension ts "markdownStyle.ts" | head -n 1) # Check if OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH is found if [ -f "$OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH" ]; then echo "\nVerifying exports from $OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH:" rg -U --type typescript "export\s+.*buildOutputGeneratorContext" "$OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH" else echo "\nError: outputGenerate.ts not found in the repository." fi # Check if MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH is found if [ -f "$MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH" ]; then echo "\nVerifying exports from $MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH:" rg -U --type typescript "export\s+.*generateMarkdownStyle" "$MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH" else echo "\nError: markdownStyle.ts not found in the repository." fiLength of output: 1232
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the imported TypeScript files and verify their exports with corrected rg usage # Test 1: Search for outputGenerate.ts and markdownStyle.ts in the repository echo "Searching for outputGenerate.ts and markdownStyle.ts in the repository:" fd --type f --extension ts "outputGenerate.ts" "markdownStyle.ts" # Assign their paths to variables OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH=$(fd --type f --extension ts "outputGenerate.ts" | head -n 1) MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH=$(fd --type f --extension ts "markdownStyle.ts" | head -n 1) # Check if OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH is found if [ -f "$OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH" ]; then echo "\nVerifying exports from $OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH:" # Attempt with corrected type identifier 'ts' rg -U --type ts "export\s+.*buildOutputGeneratorContext" "$OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH" # If still unrecognized, try without --type if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then rg -U "export\s+.*buildOutputGeneratorContext" "$OUTPUT_GENERATE_PATH" fi else echo "\nError: outputGenerate.ts not found in the repository." fi # Check if MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH is found if [ -f "$MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH" ]; then echo "\nVerifying exports from $MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH:" # Attempt with corrected type identifier 'ts' rg -U --type ts "export\s+.*generateMarkdownStyle" "$MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH" # If still unrecognized, try without --type if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then rg -U "export\s+.*generateMarkdownStyle" "$MARKDOWN_STYLE_PATH" fi else echo "\nError: markdownStyle.ts not found in the repository." fiLength of output: 1324
tests/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.test.ts (3)
9-9: LGTM! Improved test suite clarity.The rename of the describe block from 'outputGenerator' to 'xmlStyle' improves the clarity and specificity of the test suite. It now aligns more closely with the specific functionality being tested (XML style generation) and is consistent with the file naming and import changes.
4-4: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import path update for
generateXmlStylelooks good. The new file structure and naming convention ('outputStyles/xmlStyle.js') appear more consistent and cleaner.Let's verify the existence and correctness of the new import path:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the new import file and the exported function # Check if the file exists fd -p "src/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.js$" # Verify the function export ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export function generateXmlStyle' src/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.js
3-3: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import path update for
buildOutputGeneratorContextlooks good and aligns with the refactoring efforts. The new file name 'outputGenerate.js' is more specific to its purpose.Let's verify the existence and correctness of the new import path:
tests/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.test.ts (4)
9-9: LGTM! Improved test suite description.The updated test suite description ('plainStyle') is more specific and accurately reflects the focus of the test cases. This change enhances code readability and maintainability.
Line range hint
1-37: Overall, the changes look good and align with the refactoring objectives.The modifications in this file contribute to the project's restructuring without altering the test logic. The import path updates and the more specific test suite description improve code organization and readability. Ensure that similar updates are applied consistently across the project.
4-4: LGTM! Verify other imports across the project.The import path change for
generatePlainStylealigns with the refactoring objectives. The new structure (outputStyles/plainStyle.js) seems more intuitive than the previous one.To ensure consistency across the project, let's verify if there are any remaining imports from the old path:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old path # Test: Search for imports from the old path. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript --type javascript "from ['\"].*styleGenerators/plainStyleGenerator\.js['\"]"
3-3: LGTM! Verify other imports across the project.The import path change for
buildOutputGeneratorContextis consistent with the refactoring mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure consistency across the project, let's verify if there are any remaining imports from the old path:
tests/core/file/packageJsonParse.test.ts (3)
11-11: LGTM! Consistent naming.The describe block name has been updated to 'packageJsonParse', which maintains consistency with the new file name. This change ensures that the test descriptions accurately reflect the module being tested.
Line range hint
1-62: Verify consistent renaming across the codebase.The changes in this file are consistent with the PR objective of refactoring and refining the directory structure. The functionality of the tests remains intact, with only the module name being updated.
To ensure these changes have been applied consistently across the codebase, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent renaming of packageJsonParser to packageJsonParse # Test: Check for any remaining references to packageJsonParser rg --type typescript --type javascript "packageJsonParser" # Test: Verify the usage of packageJsonParse in other files rg --type typescript --type javascript "packageJsonParse"This will help identify any inconsistencies in the renaming process throughout the project.
5-5: LGTM! Verify the new file name.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new file name
packageJsonParse.js, which aligns with the PR objective of refactoring. This change looks good.To ensure the new file name is correct, run the following script:
tests/cli/actions/remoteAction.test.ts (4)
6-6: LGTM. Verify the new mock path.The mock path update is consistent with the PR objectives. The removal of "Runner" from the file name might indicate a change in the module's responsibility or naming convention.
Let's verify the existence of the new mock path:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the new mock path fd --type f "defaultAction.js" src/cli/actions
9-9: LGTM. Verify naming consistency across the codebase.The describe block name change is consistent with the updates to import and mock paths. It reflects a shift in focus from the runner to the action itself, maintaining consistency with the new file naming convention.
Let's verify the consistency of this naming convention across the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining instances of 'remoteActionRunner' in the codebase rg --type ts --type js "remoteActionRunner" # Check for the new 'remoteAction' naming in other relevant files rg --type ts --type js "remoteAction"
Line range hint
1-41: Overall LGTM. Verify test coverage.The changes in this file are consistent with the PR objectives of refining the directory structure. The refactoring appears clean and consistent, with no alterations to the actual test logic or assertions. This suggests that the underlying functionality remains unchanged.
As a final step, let's verify that the test coverage hasn't been affected:
#!/bin/bash # Run the tests and check coverage (adjust the command based on your test runner) npm test -- --coverage # Alternatively, if you're using a specific test runner like Jest # jest --coverage
2-2: LGTM. Verify the new import path.The import path update is consistent with the PR objectives of refining the directory structure. The function name remains unchanged, indicating a file location change only.
Let's verify the existence of the new import path:
tests/core/file/filePathSort.test.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! Consistent naming in test suite.The describe block name has been updated to 'filePathSort', which maintains consistency with the new file name. This change improves the readability and maintainability of the test suite.
Line range hint
1-71: Overall changes look good. Verify test coverage.The changes in this file are minimal and focused on maintaining consistency with the new file name. The core functionality tests remain unchanged, which is a good indication that the
sortPathsfunction's behavior has not been altered. These changes align well with the PR objective of refactoring and refining the directory structure.To ensure that the test coverage hasn't been inadvertently affected, let's verify the test results:
#!/bin/bash # Run the tests for this specific file and check the output npx vitest run tests/core/file/filePathSort.test.tsThis will help confirm that all tests are still passing after the refactoring.
src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.ts (1)
10-10: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import path change aligns with the PR objectives of refactoring and refining the directory structure. However, let's ensure the new file exists and contains the necessary functions.
Run the following script to verify the new file and its contents:
Expected results:
- The first command should return the path to the new file.
- The second command should list the exported functions, including
generateHeader,generateSummaryAdditionalInfo,generateSummaryFileFormat,generateSummaryNotes,generateSummaryPurpose, andgenerateSummaryUsageGuidelines.tests/core/file/fileCollect.test.ts (3)
16-16: LGTM! Describe block name updated correctly.The describe block name has been appropriately updated from 'fileCollector' to 'fileCollect', maintaining consistency with the new file naming convention. This change enhances the readability of the test suite without altering its functionality.
Line range hint
1-74: Summary: Renaming changes are consistent with refactoring objectives.The changes in this file are limited to renaming the imported module and updating the test suite description. These modifications align with the PR objectives of refining the directory structure and files. The functionality of the tests remains unchanged, which is appropriate for this type of refactoring.
To ensure the consistency and completeness of these changes:
- Verify that all references to
fileCollector.jshave been updated throughout the codebase.- Confirm that similar renaming has been applied to related files and imports.
- Ensure that the build and test processes have been updated to reflect these changes.
To verify the consistency of these changes across the codebase, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in file naming and imports # Test 1: Check for any remaining 'Collector' suffixes in file names echo "Checking for any remaining 'Collector' suffixes in file names:" fd -e js -e ts "Collector\.(?:js|ts)$" # Test 2: Check for any remaining imports with 'Collector' suffix echo "Checking for any remaining imports with 'Collector' suffix:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "from ['\"].*Collector['\"]" # Test 3: Verify that 'fileCollect.js' exists in the expected location echo "Verifying 'fileCollect.js' exists:" fd "fileCollect.js" src/core/file # Test 4: Check for any inconsistencies in naming convention echo "Checking for inconsistencies in naming convention:" fd -e js -e ts | grep -vE '(Collect|collect)\.(?:js|ts)$' | grep -E 'src/core/|tests/core/'
7-7: LGTM! Verify consistent renaming across the codebase.The import statement has been correctly updated to reflect the new file name
fileCollect.js. This change aligns with the refactoring objective of refining the directory structure and files.To ensure consistency, let's verify that this renaming has been applied throughout the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Continuing verification to ensure consistent renaming across the codebase. Please run the following shell script:
Consistent Renaming Verified
All references to
fileCollector.jshave been successfully updated tofileCollect.js. No remaining imports or files with the old name were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'fileCollector.js' # Test 1: Search for any remaining imports of 'fileCollector.js' echo "Checking for remaining imports of 'fileCollector.js':" rg --type typescript --type javascript "from ['\"].*fileCollector\.js['\"]" # Test 2: Search for any files still named 'fileCollector.js' echo "Checking for any remaining 'fileCollector.js' files:" fd "fileCollector.js"Length of output: 1863
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'fileCollector.js' # Test 1: Search for any remaining imports of 'fileCollector.js' echo "Checking for remaining imports of 'fileCollector.js':" rg "from ['\"].*fileCollector\.js['\"]" --no-ignore -g "*.ts" -g "*.js" # Test 2: Search for any files still named 'fileCollector.js' echo "Checking for any remaining 'fileCollector.js' files:" fd "fileCollector.js" --extension js --extension tsLength of output: 373
tests/core/security/securityCheck.test.ts (3)
3-5: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and maintain test integrity.The modifications to this file are minimal and consistent with the PR's goal of refining the directory structure. The import path and test suite name have been updated without altering the core functionality of the tests. These changes contribute to improved code organization and maintainability.
5-5: LGTM. Verify consistency of test suite naming across the codebase.The describe block name has been updated to 'securityCheck', which is more descriptive and aligns with the new file naming convention.
To ensure consistency across the test suite, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new test suite name and check for any remaining old names. # Test 1: Check for the new test suite name usage echo "Checking for new test suite name usage:" rg --type typescript "describe\('securityCheck'" -g 'tests/**/*.test.ts' # Test 2: Check for any remaining old test suite names echo "Checking for any remaining old test suite names:" rg --type typescript "describe\('secretLintRunner'" -g 'tests/**/*.test.ts' # Expected results: # Test 1 should show this file and potentially other related test files using the new name. # Test 2 should not return any results, indicating no old test suite names remain.
3-3: LGTM. Verify consistency of import path across the codebase.The import statement has been updated correctly to reflect the new file structure. This change aligns with the PR objective of refining the directory structure.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Needed: Adjust
rgCommand for File Type RecognitionThe previous script encountered an issue with recognizing the
typescriptfile type. To ensure accurate verification of import path consistency, please run the revised script below:
Retry Verification with Corrected Regex Patterns
The previous script encountered regex parsing errors due to improper escaping. Please run the revised script below to verify the consistency of import paths:
Retry Verification with Fixed String Matching
The previous script encountered regex parsing errors due to improper escaping. To ensure accurate verification of import path consistency, please run the revised script below using fixed string matching:
Import Path Consistency Verified
All import paths have been updated correctly, and no old import paths remain in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new import path and check for any remaining old import paths. # Test 1: Check for the new import path echo "Checking for new import path usage:" rg --type typescript "from '.*src/core/security/securityCheck\.js'" -g '!tests/core/security/securityCheck.test.ts' # Test 2: Check for any remaining old import paths echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths:" rg --type typescript "from '.*src/core/security/securityCheckRunner\.js'" # Expected results: # Test 1 should show other files using the new import path. # Test 2 should not return any results, indicating no old import paths remain.Length of output: 430
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new import path and check for any remaining old import paths without relying on file types. # Test 1: Check for the new import path usage echo "Checking for new import path usage:" rg "from '\\.\\.\\/\\.\\.\\/src/core/security/securityCheck\\.js'" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' --ignore-file .gitignore # Test 2: Check for any remaining old import paths echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths:" rg "from '\\.\\.\\/\\.\\.\\/src/core/security/securityCheckRunner\\.js'" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' --ignore-file .gitignore # Expected results: # Test 1 should list all instances using the new import path outside the specified test file. # Test 2 should return no results, indicating that no files are using the old import path.Length of output: 681
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new import path and check for any remaining old import paths without relying on file types. # Test 1: Check for the new import path usage echo "Checking for new import path usage:" rg 'from "\.\.\/\.\.\/src/core/security/securityCheck\.js"' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' --ignore-file .gitignore # Test 2: Check for any remaining old import paths echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths:" rg 'from "\.\.\/\.\.\/src/core/security/securityCheckRunner\.js"' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' --ignore-file .gitignore # Expected results: # Test 1 should list all instances using the new import path outside the specified test file. # Test 2 should return no results, indicating that no files are using the old import path.Length of output: 669
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new import path and check for any remaining old import paths using fixed string matching. # Test 1: Check for the new import path usage echo "Checking for new import path usage:" rg -F 'from "../../src/core/security/securityCheck.js"' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' --ignore-file .gitignore # Test 2: Check for any remaining old import paths echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths:" rg -F 'from "../../src/core/security/securityCheckRunner.js"' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' --ignore-file .gitignore # Expected results: # Test 1 should list all instances using the new import path outside the specified test file. # Test 2 should return no results, indicating that no files are using the old import path.Length of output: 393
tests/integration-tests/packager.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-85: LGTM. No further changes required.The rest of the file correctly uses the imported functions
loadFileConfigandmergeConfigs. No additional modifications are necessary as a result of the import path change.src/cli/cliRun.ts (5)
6-6: Verify the new file name across the codebase.The import path change for
handleErroris consistent with the refactoring objectives.Let's verify the new file name usage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new file name 'errorHandle.js' is used consistently. # Test 1: Check if the new file exists fd -e js -e ts 'errorHandle' # Test 2: Ensure no references to the old file name remain rg -t js -t ts 'errorHandler'
8-8: Verify the new file name across the codebase.The import path change for
runDefaultActionaligns with the refactoring pattern of simplifying action runner file names.Let's verify the new file name usage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new file name 'defaultAction.js' is used consistently. # Test 1: Check if the new file exists fd -e js -e ts 'defaultAction' # Test 2: Ensure no references to the old file name remain rg -t js -t ts 'defaultActionRunner'
9-9: Verify the new file name across the codebase.The import path change for
runInitActioncontinues the pattern of simplifying action runner file names.Let's verify the new file name usage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new file name 'initAction.js' is used consistently. # Test 1: Check if the new file exists fd -e js -e ts 'initAction' # Test 2: Ensure no references to the old file name remain rg -t js -t ts 'initActionRunner'
10-10: Verify the new file name across the codebase.The import path change for
runRemoteActionmaintains consistency with the pattern of simplifying action runner file names.Let's verify the new file name usage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new file name 'remoteAction.js' is used consistently. # Test 1: Check if the new file exists fd -e js -e ts 'remoteAction' # Test 2: Ensure no references to the old file name remain rg -t js -t ts 'remoteActionRunner'
11-11: Verify the new file name across the codebase.The import path change for
runVersionActioncompletes the pattern of simplifying action runner file names.Let's verify the new file name usage:
✅ Verification successful
Import path for
runVersionActionhas been updated correctly.The new file
versionAction.jsis present, and no references to the old fileversionActionRunner.jsremain.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new file name 'versionAction.js' is used consistently. # Test 1: Check if the new file exists fd -e js -e ts 'versionAction' # Test 2: Ensure no references to the old file name remain rg -t js -t ts 'versionActionRunner'Length of output: 140
src/cli/cliPrint.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new module structure. This change is likely part of a larger refactoring effort.
To ensure consistency, let's verify that all imports from the old path have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful!
All imports from'../core/security/securityCheckRunner.js'have been removed, and the new import'../core/security/securityCheck.js'is consistently used only insrc/cli/cliPrint.ts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old security module path # Test 1: Search for any remaining imports from the old path echo "Checking for any remaining imports from '../core/security/securityCheckRunner.js':" rg --type typescript "from '../core/security/securityCheckRunner\.js'" || echo "No occurrences found." # Test 2: Verify that the new import path is used consistently echo -e "\nChecking for imports from the new path '../core/security/securityCheck.js':" rg --type typescript "from '../core/security/securityCheck\.js'"Length of output: 628
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old security module path and verify the new import path consistently across TypeScript files. # Test 1: Search for any remaining imports from the old path echo "Checking for any remaining imports from '../core/security/securityCheckRunner.js':" rg "from '../core/security/securityCheckRunner\.js'" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' || echo "No occurrences found." # Test 2: Verify that the new import path is used consistently echo -e "\nChecking for imports from the new path '../core/security/securityCheck.js':" rg "from '../core/security/securityCheck\.js'" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 679
src/cli/actions/remoteAction.ts (3)
9-9: Verify consistency of cliRun.js import across the codebaseThe import path for the
CliOptionstype has been updated from'../cliRunner.js'to'../cliRun.js'. This change appears to be part of a file renaming.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old file name:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'cliRunner.js' # Test: Search for 'cliRunner.js' in all TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type-add 'script:*.{ts,js}' --type script 'cliRunner\.js' # Test: Verify that 'cliRun.js' exists and is being used fd -e ts -e js -x rg 'cliRun\.js' {}
11-11: Verify consistency of defaultAction.js import across the codebaseThe import path for
runDefaultActionhas been updated from'./defaultActionRunner.js'to'./defaultAction.js'. This change appears to be part of a file renaming.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old file name:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'defaultActionRunner.js' # Test: Search for 'defaultActionRunner.js' in all TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type-add 'script:*.{ts,js}' --type script 'defaultActionRunner\.js' # Test: Verify that 'defaultAction.js' exists and is being used fd -e ts -e js -x rg 'defaultAction\.js' {}
7-7: Verify consistency of errorHandle.js import across the codebaseThe import path for
RepopackErrorhas been updated from'../../shared/errorHandler.js'to'../../shared/errorHandle.js'. This change appears to be part of a file renaming.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old file name:
✅ Verification successful
Re-run verification with corrected scripts to ensure accurate search for
errorHandler.jsanderrorHandle.js.Please execute the following scripts to accurately verify the import paths:
Import path update for
RepopackErroris consistent across the codebaseAll references to
errorHandler.jshave been successfully updated toerrorHandle.js, ensuring consistent import paths throughout the project.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'errorHandler.js' # Test: Search for 'errorHandler.js' in all TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type-add 'script:*.{ts,js}' --type script 'errorHandler\.js' # Test: Verify that 'errorHandle.js' exists and is being used fd -e ts -e js -x rg 'errorHandle\.js' {}Length of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'errorHandler.js' # Search for 'errorHandler.js' in all TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type-add 'script:*.{ts,js}' --type script 'errorHandler\.js' # Description: Verify that 'errorHandle.js' exists and is being used rg --type-add 'script:*.{ts,js}' --type script 'errorHandle\.js'Length of output: 566
tests/cli/actions/defaultAction.test.ts (3)
10-11: LGTM! Mock paths correctly updated.The mock path updates are consistent with the import path changes, ensuring that the correct modules are mocked for testing.
Line range hint
1-138: Overall changes look good. Functionality remains intact.The changes in this file are consistent with a project-wide refactoring of file structure and naming conventions. Import paths and mock configurations have been updated accordingly, while the core test logic remains unchanged. This suggests that the functionality being tested has not been altered, which is a positive sign for maintaining the integrity of the codebase during refactoring.
To ensure the refactoring hasn't introduced any unintended changes, let's verify the test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for the defaultAction module # Run tests with coverage for the defaultAction module npx vitest run tests/cli/actions/defaultAction.test.ts --coverage # Display coverage report npx vitest coverageThis will help confirm that the test coverage hasn't been affected by the refactoring.
3-6: LGTM! Verify new import paths across the project.The import path updates are consistent and align with the project restructuring. The changes look good, but it's important to ensure these new paths are correct and consistent across the entire project.
Let's verify the existence and consistency of these new import paths:
tests/config/configLoad.test.ts (3)
22-22: LGTM! Test suite description updated correctly.The test suite description has been appropriately updated to 'configLoad', which aligns with the module renaming. This change maintains consistency between the module name and its corresponding test suite.
Line range hint
1-103: Summary: Minimal changes maintain test integrity.The changes in this file are minimal and focused, addressing only the necessary updates due to the module renaming from 'configLoader' to 'configLoad'. The import statement and test suite description have been updated accordingly, while the functionality of all test cases remains unchanged. This approach ensures that the integrity of the test suite is maintained throughout the refactoring process.
6-6: LGTM! Verify other imports across the codebase.The import statement has been correctly updated to reflect the module renaming from 'configLoader.js' to 'configLoad.js'. This change is consistent with the refactoring objectives.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check for any remaining imports of the old module name:
✅ Verification successful
Import statement verification passed.
No remaining imports of 'configLoader.js' were found across the codebase, ensuring consistency with the module renaming.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports of the old 'configLoader.js' module # Test: Search for imports of 'configLoader.js'. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript --type javascript "from ['\"].*configLoader\.js['\"]"Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports of the old 'configLoader.js' module # Test: Search for imports of 'configLoader.js'. Expect: No results. rg --glob '**/*.{ts,js}' "from ['\"].*configLoader\.js['\"]"Length of output: 66
src/config/configLoad.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM. Verify other imports of RepopackError.The import path change for RepopackError is consistent with the PR's refactoring objectives. However, ensure that all other files importing RepopackError have been updated accordingly to maintain consistency across the codebase.
Run the following script to verify other imports of RepopackError:
6-6: LGTM. Verify other imports from the config validation module.The import path change for RepopackConfigValidationError and validateConfig aligns with the PR's refactoring goals. To ensure consistency, verify that all other files importing from the config validation module have been updated.
Run the following script to verify other imports from the config validation module:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Import paths correctly updated.
All imports from the config validation module have been updated to
'configValidate.js', and no remaining imports from'configValidator.js'were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old 'configValidator.js' file # Test 1: Search for imports from 'configValidator.js'. Expect: No results. echo "Checking for imports from 'configValidator.js':" rg --type typescript "from '.*configValidator\.js'" || echo "No imports found from 'configValidator.js'" # Test 2: Verify all imports of RepopackConfigValidationError and validateConfig are from 'configValidate.js' echo -e "\nVerifying imports of RepopackConfigValidationError and validateConfig:" rg --type typescript "import.*(?:RepopackConfigValidationError|validateConfig).*from" | grep -v "configValidate\.js" || echo "All RepopackConfigValidationError and validateConfig imports are from 'configValidate.js'"Length of output: 812
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old 'configValidator.js' file # Test 1: Search for imports from 'configValidator.js'. Expect: No results. echo "Checking for imports from 'configValidator.js':" rg --glob '*.ts' "from '.*configValidator\.js'" || echo "No imports found from 'configValidator.js'" # Test 2: Verify all imports of RepopackConfigValidationError and validateConfig are from 'configValidate.js' echo -e "\nVerifying imports of RepopackConfigValidationError and validateConfig:" rg --glob '*.ts' "import.*(?:RepopackConfigValidationError|validateConfig).*from" | grep -v "configValidate\.js" || echo "All RepopackConfigValidationError and validateConfig imports are from 'configValidate.js'"Length of output: 734
src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.ts (1)
10-10: LGTM! Verify consistency of the new file name.The change from
outputStyleDecorator.jstooutputStyleDecorate.jsaligns with the PR objective of refining the directory structure and files. The functionality should remain intact as only the file name has changed.To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following verification script:
src/core/packager.ts (7)
15-15: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new file name
tokenCount.jsand directory nametokenCount, which follow a more consistent naming convention. The class name and import remain unchanged, maintaining compatibility. The import path has been updated accordingly.Let's verify the existence of the new file:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the new file fd -p "src/core/tokenCount/tokenCount.js"
Line range hint
1-15: Overall assessment: Consistent and well-executed refactoring.The changes in this file are limited to import statement updates, reflecting a broader refactoring of the project's file structure and naming conventions. These modifications improve consistency across the codebase while maintaining compatibility by preserving function and class names. The refactoring appears to be well-executed and aligns with the stated PR objectives.
To ensure the refactoring hasn't introduced any unintended changes, let's verify that only import statements were modified:
#!/bin/bash # Check for changes other than import statements rg -n -e '^[^import]' src/core/packager.ts | rg -v '^[0-9]+:'This command should return no results if only import statements were changed.
10-10: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new file name
fileCollect.js, which follows a more consistent naming convention. The function name and import alias remain unchanged, maintaining compatibility.Let's verify the existence of the new file:
13-13: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new file name
outputGenerate.js, which follows a more consistent naming convention. The function name and import alias remain unchanged, maintaining compatibility. The import path has been updated accordingly.Let's verify the existence of the new file:
14-14: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new file name
securityCheck.js, which follows a more consistent naming convention. The function name, import alias, and type import remain unchanged, maintaining compatibility. The import path has been updated accordingly.Let's verify the existence of the new file:
12-12: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new file name
fileSearch.js, which follows a more consistent naming convention. The function name and import alias remain unchanged, maintaining compatibility.Let's verify the existence of the new file:
11-11: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new file name
fileProcess.js, which follows a more consistent naming convention. The function name and import alias remain unchanged, maintaining compatibility.Let's verify the existence of the new file:
tests/core/file/fileProcess.test.ts (4)
7-7: LGTM! Mock path updated correctly.The mock path has been updated to reflect the new file name
fileManipulate.js, which is consistent with the import path change. This ensures that the correct module is mocked for testing.
9-9: LGTM! Test suite description updated.The test suite description has been updated from 'fileProcessor' to 'fileProcess', which aligns with the new module name. This change maintains consistency between the test description and the module being tested.
2-3: LGTM! Verify new file names.The import path changes are consistent with the refactoring described in the PR objectives. These updates reflect the renaming of source files from
fileManipulator.jstofileManipulate.jsandfileProcessor.jstofileProcess.js.To ensure the correctness of these changes, please run the following script to verify the existence of the new files:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the renamed files # Test: Check if the new files exist fd -e js -p src/core/file/ 'fileManipulate|fileProcess' # Expected output: Should list the new files # src/core/file/fileManipulate.js # src/core/file/fileProcess.js
Line range hint
1-156: LGTM! Verify test coverage.The changes in this file are limited to import paths and the test suite description. The test cases and their implementations remain unchanged, which is consistent with the PR objectives of refactoring the directory structure and file names without altering core functionality.
To ensure that the test coverage hasn't been affected by the refactoring, please run the following script:
tests/core/packager.test.ts (4)
Line range hint
1-180: Overall assessment: Changes align with refactoring objectives.The modifications in this file are consistent with the PR's objective of refactoring the directory structure and files. The changes are limited to import paths and mock setups, with no alterations to the test logic itself. This suggests a well-executed refactoring effort that maintains the integrity of the existing tests.
To ensure the refactoring is complete and consistent:
- Review the results of the verification scripts provided in the previous comments.
- Double-check that all import statements and mock setups throughout the codebase have been updated to reflect the new structure.
- Verify that the tests still pass after these changes.
10-10: LGTM! Verify consistency and update related function calls if necessary.The mock setup for the security check module has been updated correctly. This change suggests a restructuring or renaming of the security check module.
Let's verify the consistency of this change and check related function calls:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in security check module references and usage # Test 1: Search for any remaining imports or references to the old security check path echo "Checking for old security check references:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "security/securityCheckRunner" # Test 2: Verify that the new security check module exists echo "Verifying new security check module:" fd -e ts -e js "securityCheck.ts" # Test 3: Check for any function calls that might need updating echo "Checking for potentially affected function calls:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "runSecurityCheck|securityCheck"Please review the output of these commands and update any related function calls if necessary to maintain consistency with the new module structure.
11-11: LGTM! Ensure all references are updated.The mock setup for
TokenCounterhas been correctly updated to match the new import path.To ensure all references have been updated, run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old TokenCounter mock path # Test: Search for any remaining mock setups using the old path echo "Checking for old TokenCounter mock setups:" rg --type typescript "mock\('.*tokenCounter/tokenCounter'\)"
5-5: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The import path for
TokenCounterhas been updated correctly. This change aligns with the restructuring of module paths mentioned in the PR objectives.Let's verify that this change is consistent across the codebase:
tests/cli/actions/initAction.test.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-168: Overall changes look good, test coverage maintained.The changes in this file are minimal and focused on renaming 'initActionRunner' to 'initAction'. It's great to see that the comprehensive test coverage for both
createConfigFileandcreateIgnoreFilefunctions has been maintained. The test cases cover various scenarios including:
- Creating new config and ignore files
- Handling existing files
- User prompts for overwriting
- Global vs local file creation
- User cancellations
This ensures that the refactoring hasn't introduced any regressions in the functionality.
13-13: LGTM: Test suite description updated correctly.The describe block's description has been updated from 'initActionRunner' to 'initAction', which is consistent with the file renaming.
Let's verify if all references within this test file are consistent with the new naming:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: No remaining references to 'initActionRunner' found in the test file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'initActionRunner' in this test file # Test: Search for 'initActionRunner' in this specific test file rg --type-not binary 'initActionRunner' tests/cli/actions/initAction.test.ts # If the above command doesn't return any results, it means all references have been updated correctly within this file.Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'initActionRunner' in this test file # Test: Search for 'initActionRunner' in this specific test file without excluding any file types rg 'initActionRunner' tests/cli/actions/initAction.test.ts # If the above command returns any results, it means there are remaining references that need to be addressed.Length of output: 58
5-5: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path has been updated from 'initActionRunner.js' to 'initAction.js', which is consistent with the refactoring mentioned in the PR objectives.
Let's verify if there are any remaining references to 'initActionRunner.js' in the codebase:
tests/core/file/fileManipulate.test.ts (3)
4-4: LGTM. Test suite description updated correctly.The test suite description has been appropriately updated to reflect the new module name
fileManipulate. This change maintains consistency with the module renaming.
Line range hint
1-24: Summary: File successfully updated as part of module renaming.The changes in this file are consistent with the PR objectives of refining the directory structure and files. The
fileManipulatormodule has been renamed tofileManipulate, which is reflected in both the import statement and the test suite description. The test cases themselves remain unchanged, indicating that the core functionality being tested has not been altered.These changes contribute to improving the overall consistency of the codebase. However, it's crucial to ensure that this renaming has been applied consistently across the entire project to prevent any potential issues with imports or references to the old module name.
2-2: LGTM. Verify consistency across the project.The import statement has been correctly updated to reflect the module renaming from
fileManipulatortofileManipulate. This change is consistent with the refactoring mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any instances where the old module name is still being used and confirm that the new module name is being imported correctly.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests