docs(contributing): Simplify documentation update guideline#1064
docs(contributing): Simplify documentation update guideline#1064
Conversation
Contributors now only need to update README.md for documentation changes. Website documentation updates will be handled by maintainers.
Summary of ChangesHello @yamadashy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request simplifies the documentation update guideline for contributors by centralizing all documentation changes to the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughCONTRIBUTING.md documentation guidance was updated to redirect contributors to update README.md instead of website documentation files, shifting responsibility for website updates to maintainers. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request simplifies the documentation contribution guidelines by directing contributors to update only the README.md file, with maintainers handling website updates. This is a good change to lower the barrier for contributions. I've left one comment with a suggestion to improve the clarity of the new instructions and avoid redundancy with another section in the CONTRIBUTING.md file.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1064 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.24% 90.24%
=======================================
Files 124 124
Lines 9605 9605
Branches 1754 1754
=======================================
Hits 8668 8668
Misses 937 937 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Deploying repomix with
|
| Latest commit: |
36d051c
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://71a13ac8.repomix.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://docs-simplify-contribution-d.repomix.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md (1)
98-99: Consider moving the contributor responsibility statement to the "Pull Requests" section for clearer organization.The new content at lines 98–99 clarifies the contribution workflow well and aligns with the PR objectives. However, placing it at the end of the "Website Development" section (which focuses on local setup) is somewhat indirect. Since this is a contributor responsibility statement, it would be more discoverable and logically grouped in the "Pull Requests" section (lines 17–23) alongside other requirements.
Additionally, line 78 in the "Documentation" section already directs contributors to update README.md, so consider consolidating the two statements to avoid redundancy.
🔎 Suggested reorganization
Move lines 98–99 to the "Pull Requests" section and consolidate with the existing documentation guidance:
## Pull Requests Before submitting a Pull Request, please ensure: 1. Your code passes all tests: Run `npm run test` 2. Your code adheres to our linting standards: Run `npm run lint` -3. You have updated relevant documentation (especially README.md) if you've added or changed functionality. +3. You have updated README.md if you've added or changed functionality. Website documentation updates will be handled by maintainers.Then remove lines 98–99 from the "Website Development" section.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (13)
- GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest, 20.x)
- GitHub Check: Test (macos-latest, 20.x)
- GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest, 25.x)
- GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest, 22.x)
- GitHub Check: Test (ubuntu-latest, 25.x)
- GitHub Check: Build and run (windows-latest, 22.x)
- GitHub Check: Test (macos-latest, 22.x)
- GitHub Check: Test (macos-latest, 25.x)
- GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest, 24.x)
- GitHub Check: Build and run (windows-latest, 25.x)
- GitHub Check: Test with Bun (windows-latest, latest)
- GitHub Check: claude-review
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
Code Review - PR #1064Summary: This PR simplifies the documentation contribution guidelines by directing contributors to update only README.md, with maintainers handling website documentation updates. What looks good
Review FeedbackMinor observation about section redundancy The CONTRIBUTING.md file now has two mentions of updating README.md:
This is not a blocker, but you may want to consider whether the (especially README.md) phrasing in line 23 should be updated to say You have updated the README.md if you have added or changed functionality to be more direct and consistent with the new guidance. Premortem Analysis
VerdictLGTM - This is a straightforward documentation improvement that reduces contributor friction. No code changes, no security concerns, no test coverage needed. Generated with Claude Code |
1 participant
Simplify the documentation update guideline for contributors.
Changes:
This reduces the barrier for contributions by not requiring contributors to understand the website structure.
Checklist
npm run testnpm run lint