-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(tests): added tests for Mutex #2
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @cnlangzi - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
General suggestions:
- Consider reviewing the error handling strategy to ensure consistency and clarity across the system.
- Evaluate the impact of the changes on the system's performance, particularly in high-load scenarios.
- Ensure that the new logic integrates seamlessly with existing components and does not introduce regressions.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good
Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 70.02% 85.78% +15.75%
===========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 337 422 +85
===========================================
+ Hits 236 362 +126
+ Misses 86 40 -46
- Partials 15 20 +5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
Fixes
Mutex